California Sues Standard & Poor’s

February 5, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris filed a lawsuit against Standard & Poor’s (S&P) for inflating its ratings of structured finance investments.

Harris says S&P’s actions caused California’s public pension funds and other investors to lose billions of dollars. The complaint alleges that the McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. and Standard and Poor’s Financial Services LLC violated the False Claims Act and other state laws by using a ratings process based on what senior executives described as “magic numbers” and “guesses.”  

Specifically, the complaint alleges that, from 2004 to 2007, S&P systematically misrepresented to the public, and to the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State Teachers Retirement System (CalSTRS), that its ratings of structured finance securities were based on an independent, objective and reliable analysis, and not influenced by S&P’s economic interests. In doing so, S&P lowered its standards for rating securities to gain market share and increase profits and violated the False Claims Act by making false statements about the nature and risk of investments. The complaint also describes the company’s efforts to suppress the development of new and more accurate ratings models.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

In mid-2007, the housing bubble burst. After securities that S&P had deemed the least risky began defaulting, S&P downgraded many residential mortgage backed securities investments. The market collapsed, and of those securities issued in 2007, more than 90% were downgraded to junk status. The two retirement systems lost approximately $1 billion.  

Attorney General Harris joined the U.S. Department of Justice and 12 other states and the District of Columbia in announcing lawsuits against S&P. However, California’s suit includes a claim for triple damages, because when the state makes a purchase based on a false statement, the defendant is responsible for the amount lost times three.   

The complaint can be downloaded from here, at the bottom of the page.

“Problem Solver” a Résumé Problem

February 5, 2013 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Some résumé catchphrases have lost meaning for employers.

“A resume full of cliches but short on specifics won’t be memorable to hiring managers,” said OfficeTeam Executive Director Robert Hosking. “Employers want concrete examples of professional achievements as well as descriptions of any transferrable skills that can be applied to the open position.”

OfficeTeam asked executives, “What is the most overused or meaningless phrase you see on resumes?” The following are some of their top responses:

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

  • Highly qualified
  • Hard worker
  • Team player
  • Problem solver
  • Flexible
  • People person
  • Self-starter

“People recall the stories they hear,” Hosking said. “During interviews, job applicants should share anecdotes that illustrate their best qualities.”

The OfficeTeam survey was conducted by an independent research firm and is based on telephone interviews with more than 1,300 senior managers at companies with 20 or more employees in the United States and Canada. 

Sara Kelly

«