Canada Pension Plan to Increase Benefits Payout by 1.7%

December 27, 2004 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Canadian pensioners will receive a slight boost in their Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefits, with a 1.7% increase set for 2005.

Social Development Canada has announced that CPP benefits, adjusted once a year based on the Consumer Price Index, will increase starting January 1.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The country’s Old Age Security (OAS) benefits, which provide basic minimum income for more than 96% of the country’s seniors, will not see an increase in 2005. OAS benefits are calculated quarterly and retirees have seen a 2.2% increase over the past year in the benefits. The current payout for OAS benefits – paid to those 65 and older – sits at $471.76 per month. In 2003/2004, the OAS system paid out a total of $27 billion to 4.1 million senior citizens.

Through OAS benefits, low-income Canadians also receive Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and the Allowance. Adjusted quarterly, this benefits scheme will not see an increase in payouts in the next quarter.

CPP benefits are funded by workers and their employers, as well as through earnings on investments in the plan. OAS benefits originate from general tax revenues. These two systems make up the two public parts of what Canadians consider a three-part retirement system, the third being private savings and investments.

Halliburton Move to Alter Benefits Shot Down by Court

December 23, 2004 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A federal court has ruled that Halliburton cannot change retiree health benefits for a company it purchased in 1998 unless it wants to alter health care coverage for other employees.

>The ruling, issued by US District Judge Lynn Hughes of the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas, blocks a 2003 move by Halliburton to end coverage for retirees of a company it acquired in 1998, as well as to cap monthly drug contributions at $22 per person.

>When Halliburton purchased energy service firm Dresser in 1998, workers and retirees were offered better plans than those for other Halliburton employees. The company then claimed that the terms of the merger gave it the right to alter or terminate the health insurance plans and stated that it only had an obligation to provide health insurance for three years following the merger.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

>Dresser employees argued that the three-year limit only applied to employees who worked after the end of this timeframe, not for those who retired before.

>Hughes agreed with this interpretation, stating that the company must only make adjustments if it makes similar changes to the benefits of similar workers throughout the company.

“The cost to Halliburton of this benefit is $93 million,” wrote Hughes in her ruling. “This is about one-half of 1% of Halliburton’s revenue totaling $16.3 billion in 2003. This is a lot of money, but if Halliburton now considers it to be somehow too much, the solution is not to change the deal that it made in 1998. Halliburton agreed to this cost as part of its payment to Dresser.”

>She added: “Halliburton’s changes of November 2003 violate the merger agreement. Halliburton must maintain the Dresser Retiree Medical Program for eligible participants and may adjust the benefits in that program only if it makes identical changes to benefits for its similarly situated active employees.”

>The ruling in James Graves v. Halliburton Company Benefits Committee is available  here .

«