Benefits June 9, 2014

Changing View of Retirement Calls for Changed Planning

June 9, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A new definition of retirement means advice and education cannot be just about accumulating a certain amount of savings.
Reported by

Nearly three out of four (72%) pre-retirees older than 50 say their ideal retirement will include work—often in new, more flexible and fulfilling ways, a study from Merrill Lynch finds.

The common thinking on retirement is that it’s a sedentary, fixed time of life, says Ken Dychtwald, CEO of Age Wave, which partnered with Merrill Lynch for the research. “Work in Retirement: Myths and Motivations” had some surprising findings, with half (47%) of current retirees having worked or planning to work during their retirement years. “Incredibly, three-quarters of Boomers said that continued work would be extremely important in their ideal retirement,” Dychtwald says.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

But they didn’t intend to continue in the same career path. They redefined work altogether, Dychtwald tells PLANSPONSOR. Even before actually reaching retirement, they were envisioning new careers. It’s not surprising, he points out. After all, Baby Boomers famously have reinvented themselves, changing college majors with some frequency, changing spouses and religions. “They are far more likely to reinvent themselves again and again than previous generations,” Dychtwald observes.

More than half surveyed (60%) said they wanted to try something new, Dychtwald says, describing this as “absolutely stunning.” When his grandparents reached retirement age, they were not thinking of a new career, he says, but these days, “a bookkeeper somewhere is dreaming of opening a coffee shop. Someone else is thinking of being a teacher. A financial adviser might like to write a novel.” People no longer see retirement as the end of work, nor do they desire a leisured life.

While money and financial security remain important motivations for retirement careers, nearly half (48%) say continued “stimulation and satisfaction” are the main reasons they want to work in retirement. “Older workers have such a powerful storehouse of knowledge and skills, and companies are waking up to this opportunity. We’re now seeing a more gradual fadeout of a person’s working career and hopefully a better harnessing by companies of what older workers have to offer,” said Andy Sieg, head of Global Wealth and Retirement Solutions for Bank of America Merrill Lynch, during a press call when the first of three reports from the study was released (see “Financial Resources for Retirement Changing”).

Another surprising trend revealed by the survey, Dychtwald says, is the career intermission. About half of working retirees (52%) said they wanted a break when they stopped working, for periods lasting anywhere from a few months to a few years. But it’s clear they are looking for a temporary respite. One respondent, he recalls, said her bucket list was empty after three years, and she was bored and wanted to get back in the game.

The definition of success has changed, Dychtwald points out. Some years ago, retirement itself was the goal, and achieving it meant success. “But now the most successful people want to work longer,” he says, “and that is going to create change, too, as other people follow. It’s not because you need the money. The wealthier people are, the more they want to work in retirement.”

“A just-the-numbers approach to financial services might have worked fine for previous generations in an earlier model of retirement that was plain vanilla,” he explains.

[Retirement plan providers and advisers] must be much more fluid to understand how to educate people and meet their needs, and they will have to take a wide view, holding conversations about the things that matter to clients, Dychtwald points out. “Boomers have diverse interests, challenges and goals.”

Cyndi Hutchins, director of financial gerontology for Bank of America Merrill Lynch, agrees that the number is no longer the main point. “As a former financial adviser, we used to talk about retirement with clients, about accumulating as much money as you can,” she says. “Then at the end of the game, you put on a withdrawal rate and 4% would buy you 30 years of income in retirement.” But now the focus is on how you want your life to look in retirement, creating lifestyle goals, making sure the financial pieces are in place. The conversation is based on goals, not numbers.

“Work in Retirement: Myths and Motivations Career Reinventions and The New Retirement Workscape,” which was completed in March 2014, was conducted in partnership with Age Wave and executed online by TNS. The survey included 7,078 respondents older than 25, broken down by generation: 720 Silent Generation (ages 69 to 89), 1,781 Boomers (ages 50 to 68), 517 Generation Xers (ages 38 to 49), and 485 Millennials (ages 25 to 37).

Findings from the study can be accessed here.
Compliance June 9, 2014

PSNC 2014: Washington Update

June 9, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The Department of Labor (DOL) has increased full-scope audits of retirement plans, said Lisa Barton, a partner with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
Reported by

“Now it’s not a question of if you will get audited, but when,” Barton told attendees of the “Washington Update” panel at the PLANSPONSOR National Conference in Chicago.

In the event of an audit, be responsive, cooperative and ask questions to find out the exact reason why you are being audited, said David Levine, a principal with Groom Law Group. “Work more collaboratively,” he added. “Inquire about the purpose, rather than inundate them with information. Don’t send them every piece of paper. Also, call your lawyer before you respond to make sure [your reply] addresses what they want.”

Of particular concern to the DOL are fees, disclosures, fiduciary training of the investment and administrative committees, Barton added. “The DOL will get an independent expert to testify if fees are out of line. Make sure to train the committee to actually look at plans,” she warned.

Barton said her firm also is hearing a lot more from the DOL about revenue sharing. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) “requires plan assets paid to the plan sponsor to be reasonable,” Barton said. So, plan sponsors should be sure to ask themselves, “Are revenue sharing fees reasonable? As plan assets increase, revenue sharing increases. Did the service provider offer more services are a result?” Make sure to evaluate these fees, particularly since the 408(b)(2) regulation requiring full fee disclosure to plan sponsors now puts the onus to understand these fees squarely on the shoulders of plan sponsors, she recommended.

The DOL has also started “investigating plan sponsors, recordkeepers and other providers to ensure they are not conflicted on how they get paid,” Levine said. “It comes down to whether you went through a proper process” to ensure fees are reasonable and equitable.“There is no one right way to structure your plan’s fees,” he added. “Do you charge a flat fee and reimburse the revenue sharing back to the participants? Is it a large plan that does fee leveling through rebates? DOL hasn’t given guidance.” The key is to establish the practical reasons why you selected the fee structure you did to be fair to your participant base, Levine said. Additionally, “case law on fees has determined that they should line up with your investment policy statement and [service provider] contracts, and that you review them periodically.” If they aren’t in agreement, “amend the documents for the plan.”

According to Levine, the DOL and other agencies in Washington “have a lot of interest in lifetime income,” so plan sponsors should have this on their radar. “The DOL has put out guidance saying … they want to put out guidance” about how to calculate and display lifetime income on participant benefit statements, he said.  Other DOL concerns that are likely to be raised in 2015: a continued focus on target-date funds and disclosure as to whether its glidepath takes investors “to” or “through” retirement; guidance on buying longevity annuity contracts; an expansion of the definition of fiduciary duty; and self-directed brokerage accounts.

A general rule of thumb that can be helpful to plan sponsors when considering new investment vehicles or asset classes for their plan, Levine said, is to “ask if it is a product for product’s sake or something that can be useful to your participants.” In the coming years, for example, there may be many individuals without adequate savings who will “retire in place” and not leave their jobs, Levine said. To “incentivize these people to move on,” an annuity or lifetime income product might be very useful.

Barton and Levine turned next to enforcement and guidance from the Internal Revenue Services (IRS). The IRS has two levels of oversight, Levine said. The first is a voluntary compliance check program whereby the agency will send a sponsor a six- to 10-question survey. “Be sure to answer the questions,” he told attendees. “They could be ‘gotcha’s. If you don’t, you will be audited.” Again, as when dealing with DOL investigators, be both cooperative and proactive, Levine said. “If the questions are not relevant to your plan, call the agent.”

If a plan sponsor is unfortunate enough to face a formal audit, they should be prepared for the long haul, for these audits can last as long as 18 months, Levine added. “They move in. They want to see how you do things.” Ensure your documents are all accurate, he advised. “The recordkeeping industry has had its margins squeezed, and things move quickly. You are responsible, so make sure things are accurate.”

Barton added: “Be forthcoming.” If you are aware of issues or errors, it is often a good idea to “disclose things you know are wrong ahead of the audit.”

«