Consolidating Competition Keeps Recordkeepers on Their Toes

Fidelity’s head of workplace investing expects the recordkeeping business will grow ever more competitive over time, leading to additional consolidation and, he says, more unified services for plan participants.  

Unlike many of Fidelity’s top executives, Kevin Barry, president of workplace investing, has not spent his entire career at the firm.

Prior to Fidelity, Barry spent some 15 years working in finance roles for large consumer products companies, including Gillette and Frito-Lay. He says that his previous experiences continue to give him an important perspective into the way finance and human resources departments have to come together to build and maintain quality retirement programs. He also got an important view into the way large and small companies’ diverse workforces require a range of support services from retirement plan providers.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“One thing I learned in my earlier career in consumer products is that there is both a rational and an irrational component to how people make decisions about any product or service,” Barry says. “This is true when talking about razors or snacks, but it is also true in the financial services space.”

One element of his current gig that is quite different from the earlier consumer products work, Barry says, is that the retirement plan industry has a serious jargon problem that has held back growth. It’s hard enough to demonstrate to a potential customer what makes a given potato chip flavor better or different, or why they may want to consider buying a particular razor blade. Explaining complex financial instruments to consumers with a low level of investment savvy is even harder.  

“We don’t always help ourselves by using very complicated language,” Barry says. “Yes, there are always going to be non-intuitive parts of this business. There is so much potential complexity and a whole language of finance to be learned, but when you pull back a lot of this jargon, at the end of the day, there are simple and effective ways to communicate about investments.”

According to Barry, the key to success for recordkeepers and plan sponsors alike is to remember that it is always a human being that is facing any given buying decision, whether one is talking about consumer products or investments.

“We need to be aware of the client’s journey,” Barry says.

A shifting competitive landscape

During Barry’s time with Fidelity, the company has grown to be the largest provider of recordkeeping services to retirement plans—now overseeing thrice the assets of its nearest competitor, according to the latest PLANSPONSOR Recordkeeping Survey.

As Fidelity has grown, other companies have grown as well, and many have undergone major mergers and acquisitions that have reshaped the list of top providers. Most recently, the announcement of Principal’s acquisition of Wells Fargo’s retirement plan business further reduced the list of recordkeepers from which plan sponsors can choose. The trend of recordkeeper consolidation has been ongoing since at least 2009. In fact, an analysis of the top 20 recordkeepers by assets in 2009 versus 2017, performed by Brian O’Keefe, PLANSPONSOR’s director of research and surveys, finds only four have not pursued an acquisition-based growth strategy.

Asked about what he sees as the future of Fidelity and its competition amid a shifting industry landscape, Barry says the firm will continue its current strategy of pursuing strong organic growth. It will also be closely watching the M&A activity of its competition.

Barry says he does not think the firm or the industry in general has achieved a peak size, even as withdrawals from retirement plans are growing as the Baby Boomer generation enters retirement. This is because there are still many millions of Americans who lack access to retirement plans at work. In addition, firms like Fidelity, which have long been focused on serving 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts (IRAs), are moving into other service areas, such as student loan repayment benefits.

“In late 2017 we launched the student loan debt repayment program, and there has been an enormous amount of client interest—thousands have asked about this and have started to learn about how you can add value in this area as a plan sponsor,” Barry said. “Of course, there is a learning curve. Today, we have 59 clients already using the student loan program so far and multiples of that in terms of those with serious interest.”

Barry expects this business line to continue to heat up, thanks in no small part to the private letter ruling issued by the IRS to approve a benefit already being offered to the employees of Abbott Laboratories. In that student loan repayment program, the employer makes a non-elective retirement plan contribution on behalf of an employee, conditioned on that employee making sufficient student loan repayments. The program is voluntary—an employee must elect to enroll, and once enrolled, may opt out of enrollment on a prospective basis. If an employee participates in the program, the employee would still be eligible to make elective contributions to the plan but would not be eligible to receive regular matching contributions with respect to those elective contributions.

“This type of budget-neutral approach solves one of the key hurdles to greater adoption of student loan programs, which is that most companies that would consider this have generous benefits programs already, and they have a budget cycle internally that they have to work with,” Barry says. “It takes finance and human resources getting together to find the dollars for this type of program.”

Challenges facing recordkeepers.

Looking to the long-term future, Barry says, recordkeeping will clearly remain “an incredibly challenging and complicated set of services wherein delivering consistent quality is not easy to do at the price point that clients demand.”

“At Fidelity, stability, service, quality and price is what we compete on,” Barry says. “In that sense, we don’t get distracted by the industry consolidation. Given our position in the marketplace, we are focused on the day-to-day service quality, but we also have to focus on asking ourselves where we are going in five years and 10 years. If we just hang our hat on service quality and we don’t think about the future of the industry, the definition of great service is going to change over time, and so we would be setting ourselves up to fail.”

Barry notes that an important question for all providers (and plan sponsors) to contemplate is whether the number of providers that a given customer interacts with is growing or shrinking. In his estimation, financial services consumers are growing more comfortable with consolidating their provider relationships. They like the idea of being able to manage their money in a coordinated and rational way, Barry says. 

“There is an increasingly sophisticated set of products and components coming out every day in terms of investment options,” Barry explains. “At the same time, participants’ ability to deal with complexity is not really growing. This is why target-date funds are so popular, and why robo-advisers continue to gain traction.”

Barry expects there will be growing demand for consolidated financial services from “those people who don’t have the will, skill and time to manage their short- and especially long-term finances.”

“Workers are increasingly looking for a company that they trust to integrate all of this stuff,” Barry suggests. “Financial services companies that can play this role as the hub of the investors’ financial life will be the most successful.”

Perceptions of Retirement Preparedness Vary With Age and Time

A study from the Federal Reserve finds people at different ages have a savings threshold for feeling they are on track for an adequate retirement, and for those in retirement, reported economic well-being varies substantially with the reason for retirement.

Many adults are struggling to save for retirement and feel they are not on track with their savings, according to a report from the Federal Reserve describing the responses to the sixth annual Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking (SHED).

Because retirement saving strategies differ by circumstances and age, survey respondents are asked to assess whether or not they feel that they are on track; however, the report notes that they define that for themselves. Thirty-six percent of non-retired adults think their retirement savings is on track, 44% say it is not on track, and the rest are not sure.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

One-quarter of the non-retired indicate that they have no retirement savings or pension. Of the non-retired age 60 and older, 13% have no retirement savings or pension. Among those non-retirees who do have retirement savings, a defined contribution (DC) plan, such as a 401(k) or 403(b) plan, is the most common type. Fifty-four percent of non-retirees have money in this form. Only 22% of non-retirees report having a defined benefit (DB) pension plan.

Older adults are more likely to have retirement savings and to view their savings as on track than younger adults. Nevertheless, even among non-retirees in their 60s, 13% do not have any retirement savings, and less than half (45%) think their retirement savings are on track.

Self-assessments of retirement preparedness vary with the amount of current savings and with time remaining until retirement. Adults younger than 30 typically believe that their savings are on track if they have at least $10,000 set aside for retirement. Not surprisingly, the amount of retirement savings required for most to report being on track increases with age. Adults ages 45 to 59 who say their retirement savings are on track typically have at least $250,000 saved. For those between 30 and 44, the threshold is $100,000.

Just over two in 10 non-retirees younger than 45 have retirement savings that meet their age-specific “on track” thresholds. The fraction rises with age to 27% of adults ages 45 to 59. The threshold for most to view savings as on track rises more rapidly with age than the fraction reaching that level of retirement savings.

Overall, 5% of non-retirees have borrowed money from their retirement accounts in the prior year, 4% have permanently withdrawn funds, and 1% have done both. Those who have withdrawn early are less likely to view their retirement savings as on track than those who have not—27% versus 37%, respectively.

Managing investments and financial literacy

The level of comfort in managing retirement plan investments varies. Six in 10 non-retirees with DC plan accounts expressed low levels of comfort in making investment decisions.

Self-assessed comfort in financial decisionmaking may or may not correlate with actual knowledge about how to do so. To get some sense of individuals’ financial acumen, respondents were asked five questions commonly used as measures of financial literacy. The average number of correct answers was 2.8, and 22% of adults got all five correct. Using these measures, it appears that those expressing more comfort managing their retirement accounts also demonstrate more financial knowledge. Among those who have self-directed retirement accounts, those who express decisionmaking comfort answer more questions (3.7 out of  5) correctly, on average, than those who express little or no comfort(2.9 out of  5).

Economic well-being in retirement

More than one-quarter of adults consider themselves to be retired. The report’s discussion of current retirees includes everyone who considers themselves to be retired, even though some also report that they are still working in some capacity. Seventeen percent of retirees say they had done some work for pay or profit in the prior month.

Retirees are somewhat more likely to report that they are at least doing okay financially (78%) than non-retirees (74%). Retirees who are still working report even higher levels of well-being. Nearly half of retirees in 2018 retired before age 62, and one-fourth retired between the ages of 62 and 64. Overall, early retirees report similar levels of economic well-being as later retirees.

In deciding when to retire, a desire to do other things than work, or to spend time with family, are the most common factors. However, four in 10 retirees before age 62—and three in 10 between ages 62 and 64—say poor health contributed to their retirement. More than one-fifth of those who retired before age 65 say the lack of available work contributed to their decision

The study found economic well-being varies considerably by the reasons for retirement. Nine in 10 retirees who say doing something else was very important in their retirement decision are at least doing okay financially, versus more than half of those who retired due to poor health.

«