For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.
Court: No Proof that Firing was Discriminatory
Judge William Jay Riley wrote that Judy Libel, a former
manager for Adventure Lands of America in Iowa,
couldn’t prove a connection between increased health
insurance premiums and her firing in 2002. Libel was fired
the day after the company learned about an increase in its
health premiums, which Libel claimed raised the issue of
discrimination under the ADA or the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA).
Riley further asserted that there was no evidence that
Matthew Krantz, the general manager who fired Libel, had
any knowledge at the time he fired her that the premiums
would be increasing from $10,173 per month to $13,799 a
month.
Libel began working in 1997 for Adventure Lands, which owns
and operates an amusement park, a campground, and a
hotel/convention center. Shortly after was hired,
she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, but
continued to work. John Krantz was Adventure Lands’s
chief executive and his son, Matthew Krantz, became the
hotel’s general manager in September 2002.
According to the opinion, Matthew Krantz said Libel often
made mistakes that included failing to request menus in a
timely fashion, overbooking the hotel, and giving away
rooms for free. He fired Libel in 2002, and during that
conversation, there was no mention of Libel’s medical
condition or health insurance benefits.
The day before Libel was fired, the Adventure Lands’
health care provider told the company’s controller that
they were hiking the premiums – a fact that was not shared
with Matthew Krantz at the time. Libel claimed that in a
post-termination conversation on November 14, John Krantz
allegedly told her about the rise in health insurance
premiums and said that he could not afford health insurance
for both Libel and himself. John Krantz had cancer.
However, he later denied that the conversation even took
place.
Libel sued in federal court, claiming disability discrimination under ADA and interference with prospective insurance benefits under ERISA. After finding that Matthew Krantz was the sole decisionmaker regarding Libel’s discharge and that she failed to establish a case under ADA, ERISA, or state law, the district court granted summary judgment to Adventure Lands. Libel appealed to the 8th Circuit.
However, the appeals court rejected Libel’s request for
a summary judgment and on the grounds that her firing was
linked to the increase in premiums. Riley wrote that
“Libel presented no direct evidence of
discrimination,” and that the record doesn’t show that
“John Krantz terminated Libel, used Matthew Krantz as
a conduit to terminate Libel, or discussed any insurance
cost-cutting matters or Libel’s M.S. condition with Matthew
Krantz.”
In her appeal , Libel didn’t challenge the district
court’s finding that Libel failed to prove she has an ADA-
qualifying disability, nor did she challenge the
district court’s finding that she could not perform the
essential functions of her job, with or without a
reasonable accommodation.
For the full opinion go
here
.
You Might Also Like:
EEOC Says 74-Year-Old Worker Forced to Retire After Medical Leave
EEOC Wellness Program Rule Lawsuit Decided in Favor of AARP
The district court had previously ruled against the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, finding AARP did not prove irreparable...