COVID-19 Having Major Impact on Pensions

Many terminated or furloughed employees have taken early retirement, curtailing contributions and raising payout obligations.

“The Impact of COVID-19 on Retirement Plans,” a webinar hosted by the American Academy of Actuaries Pension Practice Council, explored how the coronavirus pandemic has affected various types of pension plans.

Linda Stone, senior pension fellow, American Academy of Actuaries, said, “Equity markets have recovered following a significant downturn during the first quarter of 2020. Year-to-date through November 30, U.S. equities have returned 15%. However, that has been offset by interest rates falling to historic lows. As a result, long-term corporate bond yields are down 70 basis points [bps] year-to-date through November 30.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

That aside, Stone said that “interest rate and asset smoothing mechanisms mitigate much of the effect of recent volatility on 2021 funding calculations. Recognition of asset gains or losses will be delayed for plans using asset smoothing, while stabilized interest rates used by single employer plans may fall less than market rates.”

Stone also said that the impact COVID-19 has on plans will vary widely across geographies, industries, plans and participants. She also noted that layoffs and furloughs have accelerated retirement and that the impact this has on plans will depend on whether the plan offers any early retirement subsidies.

Eric Keener, chairperson of the Retirement System Assessment and Policy Committee at the American Academy of Actuaries, noted that single employer pensions offered by companies in the S&P 500 had a funded status of 87% at the beginning of the year. At the height of the market volatility in March and February, that slipped to 80%, but the funded status has since risen to 89.3%.

“Sponsors of single employer plans likely need to consider the impact of the pandemic in preparing 2020 year-end disclosures and 2021 expenses,” Keener said. “While mortality may seem like the area where adjustments are most needed, turnover, retirement salary increases, lump-sum elections and other factors may be more material.”

Keener said that even though more than 300,000 people have died from COVID-19 in the United States, this increased mortality is unlikely to have a significant impact on benefit obligations for most pension plans. As to whether it might in the future, it depends on how quickly the nation can overcome the pandemic, Keener said.

To reflect their experience in 2020, single employer pension plans need to adjust data for impacted groups, i.e., those who have been terminated from the plan or who have retired, Keener said. They also need to estimate the impact from these factors on this year and reflect them as an adjustment to roll-forward assumptions, he said.

Citing Aon’s September “COVID-19 Employer Pulse Survey,” Keener noted that about one-third of employers have taken workforce actions in response to the pandemic. Thirty-one percent had either downsized their workforce via layoffs or were considering doing do, and 33% were implementing or considering long-term restructuring of their operations and workforce. Thirty-one percent had canceled or deferred base salary adjustments or merit increases, or were considering doing so.

So, while employers have made rather drastic changes to their workforce, Keener said, changes to their retirement plan have been more muted. Only 9% had either temporarily suspended or reduced employer contributions to defined contribution (DC) plans.

However, single employer defined benefit (DB) funding relief is under considerable strain, Keener said. “Some businesses are facing challenges that make it more difficult to manage pension contributions, even if such contributions were anticipated prior to the pandemic,” Keener said. “But the impact varies widely by company and industry.”

Christian Benjaminson, chairperson, Multiemployer Plans Committee at the American Academy of Actuaries, said the full impact of COVID-19 mortality on multiemployer plans is not yet known. “It will likely depend on the industry, geographical location of the plan and where retirees live,” Benjaminson said.

Like single employer pension plans, multiemployer pensions have seen a spike in retirements in some industries, with some participants choosing to retire if they are laid off, Benjaminson said. “Increased retirement is generally a loss to the plan,” he said.

Plan funding will depend on the industry. Among all industries, 63% of multiemployer plans are in the green zone. But 53% of manufacturing plans are either in the critical or declining zone. Forty-eight percent of retail/food plans are in in that state, and this is true for 39% of transportation industry plans.

“Multiemployer plan funding will depend on hours and plan contributions,” he said. A big question is “will hours return fully to pre-COVID levels or will there only be partial improvement? Will there be an increase in bankruptcies? Will the pandemic affect future bargaining by putting pressure on health and welfare costs?”

Benjaminson noted that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)’s fiscal year 2020 report shows the insolvency of the multiemployer program occurring in fiscal year 2026. PBGC says COVID-19 has not accelerated that insolvency.

However, Benjaminson says he believes that “COVID-19 is likely to accelerate the insolvency of already troubled plans and push more plans into critical and declining status. Even healthy plans will need extended time to recover from the market and demographic losses. The need for pension reform remains high for both PBGC and plans.”

Addressing public plans, Todd Tauzer, chairperson of the Public Plans Committee at the academy, said the estimated average funded status of public plans is around 71%. Most of these plans have June 30 fiscal years. “They experienced the full downturn as well as partial recovery,” Tauzer said. “Fiscal year median plan returns were up around 3.2%. Longer-term impact remains to be seen, but economic volatility is anticipated.”

Plans that have medical workers and first responders could experience some COVID-19 mortality, Tauzer said.

Like the other types of pension plans, public plans are seeing increased voluntary terminations and retirement, directly and indirectly related to COVID-19, Tauzer said. “This directly impacts contributions coming into plans. There are broad, sweeping revenue declines anticipated for state and local governments, resulting in economic disruption. Those revenue declines have created heightened competition among expenditures, including pension contributions. Some plans have eliminated supplemental pension contributions, postponed anticipated contribution increases or taken out loans.”

Annexus Retirement Solutions Launches to Address In-Plan Guaranteed Income

The new division of Annexus will focus on “re-engineering” target-date fund (TDF) structures to better enable guaranteed lifetime income as part of defined contribution (DC) plans.

Annexus has announced the launch of a venture called “Annexus Retirement Solutions,” a new division that will focus on “re-engineering” the target-date fund (TDF) structure to better enable guaranteed lifetime income as part of defined contribution (DC) plans.

In conversation with PLANSPONSOR, Dave Paulsen, former president of individual solutions and chief distribution officer of Transamerica, and Charles Millard, former director of the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), said they are pleased to have been brought onto this project as advisers. Paulsen confirmed that the new venture intends to debut its first retirement solution in early 2021, to be followed up by multiple other solutions later in the year.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The pair said Annexus Retirement Solutions is developing “a completely new and innovative offering” that makes it easy for a participant to prepare for a secure financial future.

“Our approach overcomes the barriers that have limited the appeal of [guaranteed] lifetime income solutions within retirement plans, including prohibitive costs, lack of true liquidity over the lifetime of the product and the absence of portability if a participant separates service,” Paulsen noted.

Millard emphasized that the announcement “is just the first step we are going to take.”

“We’re going to have multiple innovative income products coming out, and we will have name brand partners joining us,” he said. “Importantly, our solutions are being designed to maximize the income that is ultimately delivered to the participant. We believe we will be competitive in both the qualitative service aspects and the quantitative performance aspects.”

Paulsen said the retirement plan industry as a whole, building on the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act, is closer than ever to successfully delivering in-plan income. Paulsen and Millard said they are among the supporters of the Securing a Strong Retirement Act, which is already being referred to as the “SECURE Act 2.0” after being proposed and discussed recently in Congress.

“Solving in-plan income is all about creating a default-eligible solution, as we are doing, and, second, it’s about harnessing the power of inertia and not requiring the participant to make decisions that they are ill-equipped to make in terms of the amount of income protection they should purchase,” Paulsen said. “After a lot of work throughout the industry, I believe we are on the cusp of this type of solution being widely utilized.”

Though Annexus Retirement Solutions is an early mover in this space, it should be noted that other firms are pursuing similar strategies, including TIAA, though that firm is focused on the 403(b) marketplace. In a recent conversation with PLANSPONSOR, TIAA Senior Managing Director Tim Walsh noted his firm’s RetirePlus solution just secured its 100th client.

RetirePlus is comprised of a set of predefined asset allocation models used by plan sponsors to create risk-appropriate defaults using the investment options on the plan’s core menu. The TIAA RetirePlus models include three risk categories, 10 possible models per risk category, and a mix of mutual funds, annuities and other investment options from eight preselected asset allocation categories.

What this ultimately looks like for a given participant is that their portfolio will automatically replace portions of the traditional bond allocation with fully liquid fixed annuities as the glide path unfolds and retirement approaches. Another important feature is that an investor can choose to exit and liquidate the portfolio before, at or after their retirement date, without facing any negative consequences from “exiting” the annuity portion of the portfolio.

“The way I like to explain this is that it has many of the bells and whistles of a managed account, but it is being delivered at no additional costs to the plan or participants,” Walsh said. “RetirePlus Pro, a version of the solution, allows plan sponsors to work with advice from a 3(21) fiduciary adviser or delegate asset allocation to a 3(38) investment manager to customize all aspects of model attributes.”

From a fiduciary perspective, the TIAA RetirePlus Series satisfies Department of Labor (DOL) guidance on pursuing custom solutions supported by the SECURE Act.

“This structure, flexibility and pricing make it appropriate for a variety of client institutions,” Walsh suggested.

«