CRS: Fees Can Take Big Bite Out of 401(k)

October 19, 2007 (PLANSPONSOR.COM) - Hefty 401(k) plan fees can take a big bite out of a participant's balance - a 26% chunk, according to a new study.

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) report, Retirement Savings Accounts: Fees, Expenses, and Account Balances, found that the difference in ending balances between scenarios where fees were 2% of plan assets and where they were 0.4% of assets was $92,771 – $356,434 with lower fees and $263,663 with heftier charges.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

CRS researcher Patrick Purcell, Specialist in Income Security in the CRS Domestic Social Policy Division, explained in the report the scenarios studied involve a median-earning married couple saving 6% of family earnings yearly for 30 years with two-thirds of the account invested in equities and the rest in fixed income..

Purcell cited Investment Company Institute (ICI) data showing the average asset-weighted 401(k) stock fund expense ratio was 0.76% in 2006.

The calculations also used the distribution of rates of return in U.S. stock and bond markets over the 80-year period from 1926 through 2005, the researcher explained.

Meanwhile, according to the CRS, a median-earning single person who contributes 6% of earnings each year for 30 years to a retirement account that is invested two-thirds in stocks and one-third in bonds could expect to accumulate $187,738 in constant 2004 dollars if investment rates of return are at the historical median over the investment period and annual expenses are equal to 0.4% of plan assets.

Purcell said that same person in a plan where annual expenses were 2% of plan assets, could expect to accumulate $138,344, or 26.3% less than under the low-cost program.

For this report, CRS estimated the effect of expenses ranging from 0.4% to 2% of assets on the amounts accumulated in retirement accounts over a thirty-year period by married couples and single persons with high, median, and low earnings who contribute 6%, 8%, or 10% of earnings each year to a retirement account invested in a mix of stocks and bonds.

The study compared annual expenses of 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, and 2% of plan assets to a low-cost “base case” in which annual expenses were equal to 0.4% of assets in the account.

Male Employee Claims Sexual Harassment by Female Supervisor

October 18, 2007 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A former male employee of a Pennsylvania air filtration and purification systems plant filed a sexual harassment suit in federal court that claimed his female supervisor exposed herself to him and called him degrading names and that the company ignored his complaints about the problem.

According to the 21-page complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Jose Cruz-Gonzales claimed that his supervisor, Tammy Palentay, subjected him to repeated sexual harassment, including pulling down his pants, exposing her breasts to him and calling him “baby bottoms” and “bootylicious.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In July 2005, Cruz-Gonzales started working for the Precisionaire, Inc.’s Auburn, Pennsylvania plant, where he worked on the production line, putting air filters in heaters. He said he was subjected to “unwelcome sexual advances, touchings, overtures, and comments” by Palentay about two months after he was hired in September 2005.

Cruz-Gonzales said he complained to his supervisor and the company’s human resources department, but to no avail. He alleges that no action was taken with regard the complaints against Palentay, at which point he filed a Charge of Discrimination with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.

However, Cruz-Gonzales was forced by company officials to resign his job at the plant, because he was allegedly threatening other subordinates of Palentay after they refused to help him with his claim. He had already been warned by higher-ups not to discuss his claims, according to the complaint.

Cruz-Gonzales also claims that his firing was discriminatory and was actually a retaliation because he refused his supervisor’s sexual advances.

He is asking for an award of more than $150,000, which includes front pay, back pay and compensatory and punitive damages.

«