DC Plan Participant Use of TDFs Continues to Grow

While target-date funds (TDFs) are intended to automatically diversify retirement plan participants’ portfolios, Vanguard found nearly one-third mix TDFs with other investments and “are pursuing what appear to be reasonable diversification strategies.”

In 2018, 59% of Vanguard participants were invested in a “professionally managed allocation”—their entire account balances were invested in a single target-date fund (TDF), a single target-risk or traditional balanced fund, or a managed account advisory service.

Driving this development is the growing use of TDFs, Vanguard says. Among its DC business, 52% of participants were invested in a single TDF in 2018—a percentage that has more than tripled over the past decade. Among new plan entrants (those entering the plan for the first time), 84% of participants were invested in a single TDF. Vanguard anticipates that eight in 10 participants will be invested in a professionally managed option by 2023.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

TDF adoption by Vanguard plan sponsor clients grew from 75% of plans in 2009 to 93% of plans in 2018. TDFs accounted for more than one-third of total Vanguard DC plan assets and more than half of total DC plan contributions in 2018.

According to Vanguard, automatic enrollment—and the choice of the TDF series as a default investment—is a major factor in the rise of TDFs. However, whether or not they use automatic enrollment, 90% of all Vanguard plans had selected a TDF or balanced fund as a default investment by year-end. Eighty-four percent of plans had specifically designated a QDIA, and among those, 97% of the QDIAs were TDFs and 3% were balanced funds. Ninety-eight percent of plans with automatic enrollment are using TDFs as their default fund.

By year-end 2018, nearly all Vanguard participants (97%) were in plans offering TDFs, and eight in 10 participants whose plans offered TDFs had an investment in them. Among participants investing in TDFs, 58% of account balances on average were invested in these funds. Participants holding TDFs directed 81% of their 2018 total contributions to TDFs.

Vanguard found that “pure TDF investors,” or those who hold only a single TDF, accounted for 68% of all TDF investors in 2018. Of this total, about half joined their plan under automatic enrollment, where they typically were enrolled in a single fund by default; and about half joined their plan through voluntary enrollment, where they typically actively chose a single TDF. Vanguard research shows that pure TDF investors are more likely to be younger, lower-wage, shorter-tenured participants with lower 401(k) account balances than other investors. Sixty-three percent of single-TDF investors were younger than 45.

The remaining target-date investors are “mixed investors”—investing in a TDF in combination with other investments (or, rarely, hold multiple TDFs). In 2018, 32% of all TDF investors were mixed investors. Vanguard research indicates that about half of mixed investors arise because of plan sponsor action, including employer contributions in company stock, non-elective contributions to the plan’s default fund, recordkeeping corrections applied to the plan’s default fund, or mapping of assets from an existing investment option to a TDF default because of a plan menu change.

The remaining mixed investors intentionally construct a portfolio of both target-date and non-target-date strategies. Vanguard survey results show that most TDF investors understand the basic risk and return features of TDFs. Large percentages of participants report that they held other assets to make their portfolio allocation more conservative, more aggressive, or more customized. Forty percent cited diversification as a reason for holding additional investments along with a TDF.

Vanguard says one of the benefits of increased TDF adoption by DC plan sponsors and participants is that they eliminate extreme equity allocations. “Do-it-yourself” participants tend to hold greater extremes in equity exposure, and according to Vanguard, about two in 10 do-it-yourself investors hold extreme portfolios (no equities or only equities).

More information from Vanguard’s analysis may be found at https://institutional.vanguard.com/iam/pdf/TDFADOPT_2018.pdf.

Investment Product and Service Launches

ProShares Launches ETF for Growing Pet Care Firms; HB&T Reveals Upcoming Sequence of Collective Investment Funds; and Salt Financial Files Registration for ETF That Pays Investors. 

Art by Jackson Epstein

Art by Jackson Epstein

ProShares Launches ETF for Growing Pet Care Firms

ProShares announced a new exchange-traded fund (ETF) targeting the pet care industry.

The ProShares Pet Care ETF, otherwise known by its ticker symbol as PAWZ, exposes public companies in the global pet care industry, the same ones potentially optimizing from the “proliferation of pet ownership, and the emerging trends affecting how investors care for their pets,” according to ProShares.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

ProShares says these companies are identified using the methodology of the FactSet Pet Care Index, which consists of 24 companies that “provide exposure to potential growth within the pet care industry.”

To be eligible for the FactSet Pet Care Index, FactSet requires that the company meet at least one of the following criteria: The company’s principal revenue source is from one of eight FactSet Revere Business Industry Classification subindustries—”RBICS subindustries” for short; the company generates at least $1 billion in annual revenue from at least one of the eight RBICS subindustries; or the company’s principal business is identified by FactSet as being pet care related, but for which an appropriate RBICS subindustry has not yet been created (e.g., pet insurance).

Both U.S. and international companies are included in this index, which is rebalanced monthly and reconstituted annually, says ProShares. “At rebalance, the companies whose principal revenue source comes from pet care-related products or services will make up 82.5% of the portfolio, while companies that generate $1 billion or more (but not a principal source) of their revenue from RBICS categories will make up 17.5% of the index. The index uses a modified market cap methodology,” adds the company.

HB&T Reveals Upcoming Sequence of Collective Investment Funds

Hand Benefits & Trust (HB&T), a BPAS company, has created its new series of collective investment funds. The new series, which will invest in BlackRock funds, consists of six passively-managed index strategies. According to HB&T, they will launch as the least expensive index option available with no minimum investment. In addition, the funds are said to be available to qualified retirement plans, and trade on most major recordkeeping platforms.

The new series includes the following funds: HB&T BlackRock Large Cap Equity Index; HB&T BlackRock Mid Cap Equity Index; HB&T BlackRock Small Cap Equity Index; HB&T BlackRock MSCI ACWI ex-US Index; HB&T BlackRock U.S. Aggregate Bond Index; and HB&T BlackRock Short Term Bond Index.

“With this new series, all eligible plan sponsors and their participants can access best-in-class passively managed strategies,” says David Hand, HB&T CEO.

Salt Financial Files Registration for ETF That Pays Investors

In a March 12 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Salt Financial has made registration statements for the Salt Low truBeta US Market exchange-traded fund (ETF).

The fund seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Salt Low truBeta US Market Index.

The investment adviser has agreed to waive the fund’s full unitary management fee of 0.29% and to contribute to the fund’s assets an amount equal to an annual rate of 0.05% of the fund’s average daily net assets on the first $100 million in net assets (i.e., up to $50,000 per annum)  until at least April 30, 2020.

The fund uses a passive management (or indexing) approach to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Index. The Index was developed in 2018 by Salt Financial LLC, the fund’s investment adviser and index provider, and uses an objective, rules-based methodology to measure the performance of an equal-weighted portfolio of approximately 100 large and mid-capitalization U.S.-listed stocks with the lowest levels of variability in their historical beta calculations (beta variability) and forecasted beta of less than 1.00. Beta is a calculation of an investment’s systematic risk relative to the market.

«