Department of Labor Open to Crypto Rule for Retirement Plans

Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh also testified in Congress that President Joe Biden’s budget must be implemented to protect workers’ retirement security.  

Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh testified to the full House Committee on Education and Labor that Congressional approval of President Joe Biden’s budget is key to the agency continuing to protect workers’ retirement savings, workplace benefits and retirement security.  

In the prepared testimony, Walsh outlined the president’s DOL fiscal year 2023 budget request. He articulated a broad agenda that includes continuing Biden’s commitment to equity, investing in workers, bolstering the unemployment insurance system and restoring staff levels at DOL agencies.   

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“My vision as the Secretary of Labor is to empower workers morning, noon, and night,” Walsh said. “This includes centering our work on the most vulnerable workers, those facing barriers to employment, misclassified workers, and workers in temporary jobs or other jobs that heighten their economic insecurity and vulnerability … If enacted, the department will use these resources to get our programs where they need to be to operate effectively and efficiently while transforming them to address what we value including worker empowerment, equity, program access, and the other areas of emphasis set out by this administration.”

For the 2023 budget, Walsh requested from Congress funds sufficient to build on the administration’s accomplishments. The president’s fiscal year 2023 request for the DOL is $14.6 billion, compared with the $14.2 billion requested in 2022 and an actual approved budget of $13.2 billion for fiscal year 2022. The DOL has budgeted for 16,922 full-time equivalent employees in 2023, compared with 16,855 in 2022.   

Crypto Rule

The DOL is open to a rule that would regulate cryptocurrency in retirement accounts, Walsh told the House committee.  

“We’re looking at potentially going through a rulemaking process moving forward on the industry as a whole, “ Walsh said.

He did not divulge any details about the proposed restrictions.

Walsh also backed guidance released by the DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration that he described as a “one-off recommendation,” after Rep. Burgess Owens, R-Utah, pressed the secretary on why the guidance was released.

The Financial Times reported that Investment Company Institute CEO Eric Pan requested that the DOL void the guidance, as it was not approved by the formal notice and comment rulemaking process.

Retirement plan sponsor ForUsAll sued the DOL over the guidance, earlier this month. ForUsAll offers a retirement investing platform to employers with access to cryptocurrency through a self-directed brokerage window.  

“We made a recommendation because we were concerned about employees having 20% of their retirement savings put in cryptocurrency,” Walsh said. “Our role is to make sure that we’re protecting the rights of American workers and the investments going in.”

Fidelity Investments launched a Digital Assets Account for 401(k) plans to allow retirement plan participants to invest up to 20% of their balances in bitcoin.   

DOL Agenda

Walsh intends to lead the DOL by committing to help all workers and the unemployed, “particularly those from disadvantaged communities, access training and find pathways to high-quality jobs that can support a middle-class life,” he said.

Walsh also addressed staff losses that have led to shortages among DOL staff, including at EBSA.

“Losses to front-line enforcement, regulatory, and compliance assistance staff at the Employee Benefits Security Administration have similarly compromised the agency’s ability to ensure the solvency of self-funded health plans, the security of retirement benefits, the integrity of plan assets, the payment of promised benefits, the cybersecurity of plan accounts, and the integrity of health and disability plans,” Walsh said. “The requested FY 2023 Budget would restore lost staff and enable the agency to protect workers’ interest in their health, retirement, and disability benefits. The return on the taxpayer’s investment is significant, as reflected in the $2.5 billion it recovered last year.”

He praised frontline, so-called essential workers—including nurses, grocery workers and construction workers—for continuing to work during the COVID-19 pandemic and keeping the country’s economy afloat during that time.

Walsh also praised Congress for enacting critical funding for workers to mitigate the economic dislocation, as well as job and income losses, brought on by the pandemic.

“The emergency unemployment compensation programs extended by the American Rescue Plan,” he said, “provided life-saving benefits to American families throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, UI [unemployment insurance] benefits helped over 53 million workers who lost their jobs through no fault of their own and put some $870 billion back into the economy. These benefits helped Americans across the country stay in their homes and support their families and protected the economy from even more devastating consequences.”

The 2023 DOL budget seeks to invest $2.2 billion in the department’s worker protection agencies.

Walsh explained that additional funds the DOL has requested would be used to benefit more than 158 million workers, retirees and families who depend on Employee Retirement Income Security Act retirement plans for medical benefits and their retirement security. 

He championed EBSA to Congress, as the agency has worked to protect workers during the height of the pandemic, he said.

“In 2021, EBSA recovered over $2.5 billion in retirement savings and healthcare benefits owed to workers,” Walsh said. “This is real money—money people earned and were owed—and the Department’s staff returned it into people’s pockets and retirement accounts.”

The Senate voted down Biden’s nominee to lead EBSA, Lisa Gomez, earlier this month. 

PSNC 2022: Decumulation Designs

One reason lifetime income options are important for plan sponsors to explore is that many individuals underestimate how long they will live in retirement.

In-plan decumulation programs are essential options in a retirement plan to help plan participants manage risk in retirement, experts at the 2022 PLANSPONSOR National Conference said.

Decumulation programs assist participants in understanding how many years their accumulated retirement plan balances will last into retirement and can translate accumulated dollar amounts to monthly or periodic payments.  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Defined contribution plan participants face difficult decisions before, during and into retirement with regard to stretching their retirement account balances into lifetime income, according to industry experts at the conference. With the lifetime annuity offered by traditional defined benefit pensions now uncommon for most private-sector workers, there is a growing need for retirement income options, said Barbara Delaney, principal at StoneStreet. She called the absence of lifetime income a “big gap” in the retirement industry.

Plan sponsor Navy Federal Credit Union includes an in-plan retirement income option for participants. Emily Fahim, NFCU’s assistant vice president of benefits, detailed the program, which partnered with Fidelity Investments. The plan sponsor implemented the Fidelity managed retirement funds, “which are like target-date funds that work for people in retirement,” she said. Unlike annuities, the Fidelity funds are not guaranteed products.

The program includes modeling tools that use mortality assumptions. Participants can, like the target-date fund glide path used when investing accumulated assets, use the managed retirement fund to automatically de-risk as participants near retirement age. Select the age “you think you’re going to live to,” Fahim said. 

“Unlike an annuity where you’re locked in [and] you buy it for life, there’s still flexibility,” she said. “This will say, ‘Okay, based on the amount you have, based on the assumptions you made, we’re going to send you $1,000 a month each month.’”

Participants can withdraw additional amounts for expenses, home repairs or other costs, she added. “[If] all of a sudden, the next month you need more than that, you can always pull extra. Then it recalculates and then helps you figure out, ‘Okay, what should my new monthly amount be as I go forward?’” Fahim said.

She also noted that Navy Federal is currently encouraging employees to examine the program. “We’ve done targeted communications for 50-plus [workers], so [that] they realize this is an option,” Fahim said. “We are finding some people now are leaving their money in the plan because of the ability to do this. We’ve had really good success and people that are approaching retirement like that they have guidance or [a] person to help them figure it out.”

Thinking among plan sponsors has started to change, with employers approaching retirement plans as not only tools for asset accumulation, said Ruth Schau, senior director at Pacific Life Insurance Company’s Pension Solutions Institutional Division.

She explained that it “makes sense” for plan sponsors to approach the plan as a means of “having access to lifetime income within a retirement plan” and as a risk mitigator against fraud. “People are very vulnerable to a lot of different risks in retirement, and one of the bigger ones that I’ve seen these days is fraud,” she said.

Fahim related that elder financial fraud is often a concern for older people and their families, and that guaranteed products can lessen the risk of it.   

“I think of these as being also fraud protectors: Nobody is getting them,” Schau said. “You’re going to get this money monthly; you could lose it to fraud on a monthly basis and give it to someone, but next month it’s getting replenished.”

Retirement income investments—including investment products such as qualified longevity annuity contracts, a type of deferred annuity—function as a license to spend in retirement, Fahim noted.

Lifetime income contrasts with life insurance because “buying guaranteed lifetime income, or an annuity, is almost the opposite of life insurance,” Schau said. While the income stream created by an annuity is spent in the lifetime of the plan participant, life insurance proceeds are spent by their beneficiaries

Lifetime income is important to consider in this context. Individuals who annuitize portions of or their entire retirement balances or tap another retirement income option will consume the investment product, she explained.

“When you’re buying lifetime income, you’re hoping you actually get to use it, you want to use it for a long time and you’re benefiting yourself, because you’re managing risk,” she said. “The one thing about life insurance is you’re paying for it but you personally will never benefit from it. In fact, you’re paying for something that you hope no one will ever have to use. But again, you’re managing risk.”

Schau added that many people underestimate how long they will live. Therefore, these individuals are vulnerable to longevity risk, or running out of money in retirement if they didn’t save enough or plan for health care costs sufficiently. A 2020 study from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College found that “retirees underestimate their life spans and their health costs in late life.”

Individuals who plan to retire between ages 65 and 70 could have to figure out how to manage their money and make it last for 30 years, Schau explained.  

“Especially if you’re married and have a spouse, one of you is likely to hit 100,” she said. “I’ve seen that if you live long enough, you’re going to spend all of your defined contribution money, it will be gone and then you have nothing left. At age 90, you’re unlikely to go and get that part-time job—you don’t want to be at your most financially vulnerable position … anywhere from 80 to 90 or beyond—it’s just not a good thing.”

«