Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.
Details of Settlement of Franklin Templeton Self-Dealing Lawsuit Revealed
In addition to a more than $13 million payment, Franklin has agreed to select a non-proprietary target-date fund (TDF) for its 401(k) plan’s investment lineup and increase company match contributions for three years.
Franklin Resources will pay $13,850,000 and make other provisions to settle a lawsuit alleging that defendants breached their Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary duties by causing Franklin Templeton’s 401(k) plan to invest in funds offered and managed by Franklin Templeton when better-performing and lower-cost funds were available.
A month before the trial in the case was set to begin, the parties in the lawsuit announced they had reached a settlement but needed 60 days to file a motion for preliminary approval.
According to the settlement agreement, in addition to the settlement payment, the fiduciaries to the plan with responsibility for selecting plan investment options will add a nonproprietary target-date fund option (TDF) to the investment lineup, which will be maintained as a plan investment option for the duration of the compliance period in addition to the plan’s qualified default investment alternative (QDIA)—the LifeSmart Target Date Funds. “The choice of TDF will be made by the fiduciaries responsible for selecting Plan investment options in a manner consistent with their fiduciary oversight responsibilities, following a search of nonproprietary TDF options conducted by the Plan’s independent investment consultant, Callan Associates, Inc.,” the settlement agreement says.
Also, Franklin has agreed to increase the company match contributions to the plan from a 75% company match rate to an 85% company match rate beginning with the first full quarter of participant deferrals following the effective date of the settlement agreement, for a period of three years.
The settlement agreement says the defendants do not admit any liability in the action, including that any of their prior or existing practices violate any federal or state laws, statutes or regulations.You Might Also Like:
Plan Sponsors May Be Paying Too Much in DC Plan Fees
DOL Advisory Group Continues Discussion of QDIA Decumulation Guidance
ERISA Attorney Ian Lanoff Remembered as ‘Icon’ in Retirement Industry
« Retaliation Claim Against Central States Multiemployer Plan Dismissed