How Do You Determine Catch-Up Contributions in a 457(b) Plan?

Experts from Groom Law Group and CAPTRUST answer questions concerning retirement plan administration and regulations.

“We are a public higher education institution that sponsors a 403(b) and a 457(b) plan. Last year, we hired an employee who is now 63 years of age. He was eligible to make deferrals to both of our plans last year, but only deferred to the 403(b) plan. This year, he wants to max out in both of our plans. We know he can contribute $27,000 to the 403(b), but what about the 457(b) plan? We do have the special three-year catch-up provision in our plan, and our normal retirement age is 65. Would he qualify for that?”

Charles Filips, Kimberly Boberg, David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, senior financial adviser at CAPTRUST, answer:

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Indeed, he would qualify for the special three-year catch-up for 457(b) plans, since service is not a factor in that election, and he is in one of the three taxable years ending prior to the year in which he reaches normal retirement age (65 in your plan). Participants may only use the special three-year catch-up rule if they did not defer the maximum deferral limitation permitted in previous years, which is also applicable here. Under the rule, the maximum deferral limitation for the participant is the lesser of 1) an amount equal to twice the dollar limit on annual deferrals under Internal Revenue Code section 457(b)(2)(A) (adjusted annually for inflation); or 2) the underused limitation, i.e., the sum of the ceiling limit in effect for the year at issue, minus the amount of deferrals under any 457(b) plan for the prior taxable year.

Thus, the deferral limit is either the lesser of double the 2022 elective deferral limit (2 x $20,500, or $41,000), or this year’s limit of $20,500 plus the amount of unused 457(b) deferrals in prior years. To calculate this unused amount for this employee, we only have one prior year, which is 2021. He didn’t defer at all in 2021; if he had enough compensation in 2021 to defer the full amount to the 457(b), that would have been $19,500 in unused deferrals, since the 457(b) deferral limit in 2021 was only $19,500 (note that the age-50 catch-up does not count for this purpose). Thus, $20,500 plus $19,500 is $40,000, which is less than $41,000 and is thus the participant’s 457(b) deferral limit for 2022. Note that the participant cannot add the age-50 catch-up to this amount, since he cannot use the three-year catch-up and the age-50 catch-up in the same year. However, he can still defer a total of $67,000 total to the retirement plans you offer ($27,000 to the 403(b) and $40,000 to your 457(b) assuming that he has at least that much eligible compensation to defer), which is not too shabby!

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. 

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Amy.Resnick@issgovernance.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future column.

ERISA’s 48th Anniversary Passes Without a Senate Vote on EBSA Head

Despite push from HELP Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray, Lisa Gomez’s nomination as assistant secretary of labor remains in limbo.

On September 6, Senator Patty Murray, D-Washington, published a press release and accompanying resolution calling for the confirmation of Lisa Gomez as assistant secretary of labor for the Employee Benefits Security Administration and emphasizing the importance of Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Murray, chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Education Committee, noted in the release that approximately 142 million employees are covered by ERISA, as well as 730,000 employer-sponsored plans.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Gomez was nominated in July 2021, and failed a confirmation vote on June 8 of this year because Vice President Kamala Harris was not present in the chamber to break the 50-50 tie.

Ali Khawar has been acting assistant secretary since March 2021. David Levine of Groom Law explains that there is no limit on Khawar’s authority relative to what Gomez’s will be if she is confirmed. He says “they can keep moving forward,” and notes that “EBSA is pretty active.”

There has been some Republican opposition to Gomez’s confirmation. Ranking committee member Senator Richard Burr, R-North Carolina, did not offer specific comment on his opposition during Gomez’s confirmation hearing before the committee.

Senator Tommy Tuberville, R-Alabama, hinted at one potential source of Republican opposition during the hearing when he asked, “Do you agree that a fiduciary should always act in the best economic interests of investors and work to maximize the investor’s total return on a risk-adjusted basis?”

Although Tuberville did not mention environmental, social and governance investments specifically, he is from a state whose attorney general was among the 19 who recently issued a joint letter to Blackrock criticizing the firm for using state pension fund assets in ESG investments. The letter asserts that ESG investing does not maximize returns on investment and does not satisfy the firm’s fiduciary duty, and instead only advances a “climate agenda.”

Tuberville’s office could not be reached for comment.

Lisa Gomez has been endorsed by the AFL-CIO, a federation of unions that traditionally supports Democrats and endorsed Joe Biden for president in 2020.

Ryan Meyers, a spokesperson with Senator Murray’s office, says there is no timetable for another floor vote on Lisa Gomez’s nomination. However, Dan Zielinski of the Insured Retirement Institute says he expects Gomez to be confirmed by the end of the year.

«