Does Our Plan Fall Under SECURE 2.0’s Automatic Enrollment Requirement?

Experts from Groom Law Group and CAPTRUST answer questions concerning retirement plan administration and regulations.

Q: We are a private 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization that terminated a 401(k) plan that we had maintained for many years, replacing it with a new 403(b) plan, effective January 1, 2023. The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 passed shortly before our plan’s effective date, and we do not meet any of the exceptions to the automatic enrollment requirement that will become effective on January 1, 2025 (e.g., we’re not a church, not a government and have more than 10 employees). However, in order for our plan to be effective on January 1, 2023, we had to have a plan document in place prior to that, so we adopted a written plan in November 2022. Would that get us off the hook in terms of the automatic enrollment requirement, even though we did not commence contributions to the plan until January 2023?

Kimberly Boberg, Kelly Geloneck, Emily Gerard and David Levine, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, senior financial adviser at CAPTRUST, answer:

A: Until recently, the answer to your question was unclear, given the language of the existing SECURE 2.0 provision. However, on December 20, 2023, the IRS released Notice 2024-02, which clarifies that “a qualified [cash or deferral arrangement] or section 403(b) plan that is established before December 29, 2022, is called a pre-enactment qualified CODA or pre-enactment section 403(b) plan.” The very first Q&A expressly addresses the automatic enrollment requirement, excerpted as follows:

“Q. A-1: When is a qualified CODA established for purposes of determining whether the qualified CODA is excepted under section 414A(c)(2)(A)(i) of the Code from the requirements related to automatic enrollment (that is, whether the qualified CODA is a pre-enactment qualified CODA)?

A. A-1: For purposes of section 414A(c)(2)(A)(i), a qualified CODA is established on the date plan terms providing for the CODA are adopted initially. This is the case even if the plan terms providing for the CODA are effective after the adoption date. For example, if an employer adopted a plan that included a qualified CODA on October 3, 2022, with an effective date of January 1, 2023, then the qualified CODA would have been established on October 3, 2022 (that is, before December 29, 2022), even though the qualified CODA was not effective until after December 29, 2022.”

Thus, your 403(b) plan would be is considered to have been established in November 2022 for purposes of the SECURE 2.0 automatic enrollment provision. Accordingly, your plan will NOT have to meet the requirements for an eligible automatic contribution arrangement, or EACA, in 2025, since it was established before December 29, 2022, the effective date of SECURE 2.0.

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Amy.Resnick@issgovernance.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future column.

DOL Files Papers to Enforce Petition against TPA

The Department of Labor seeks to enforce a summons against a Philadelphia-based third-party administrator to execute an Employee Benefits Security Administration investigation.

The Department of Labor has sued a southeastern Pennsylvania third-party administrator to get health consultant Independence Administrators—a subsidiary of Independence Blue Cross and therefore of its parent company, Independence Health Group Inc.—to comply with a summons issued as part of an Employee Benefits Security Administration investigation.

The DOL filed a complaint on March 28 in U.S. district court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as part of its effort to determine if the firm and its Employee Retirement Income Security Act clients are complying with the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008. The DOL alleges Independence, a TPA to self-funded employee health and welfare plans, has failed to comply with a subpoena issued on October 25, 2022.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Independence’s refusal to comply with the Subpoena is baseless,” wrote attorneys for the DOL. “Because the acting secretary has exhausted efforts to obtain compliance, she respectfully requests that the court convene a show-cause hearing … and compel Independence to promptly respond to Request Nos. 3–7, 8–14, 17–21, and 24–28, without limitation.”

Independence confirmed on November 15, 2022, that it received the subpoena, according to the DOL filings. EBSA granted Independence an extension to respond until December 7, 2022, and Independence started producing responsive materials on January 6, 2023.

However, neither Independence nor Independence Blue Cross has communicated with EBSA or the Philadelphia Regional Solicitor’s Office since January 12, (they had communicated via phone on January 4), and the company has not produced any of the subpoenaed information since June 15, 2023, the DOL’s filing states.

The subpoena requested seven reports for each of four separate mental health or substance use disorder benefits: applied behavior analysis for autism spectrum disorders; medication-assisted treatment related to alcohol or substance use disorder; speech therapy; and nutritional counseling.

“Among other things, EBSA is attempting to determine if there are any limitations on those four benefits, the nature of those limitations, their rationale and whether there is parity between those limitations and limitations on comparable medical and surgical benefits available under the same ERISA Plan,” wrote DOL attorneys in the filings.

The recent DOL filing requests the court order Independence to appear at a show cause hearing and afterward immediately and completely respond to the subpoena.

In December 2023, the IRS announced it would finalize in June 2024 a new rule related to the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. The MHPAEA was enacted in 2008 and later incorporated into ERISA.

The law ensures that, “in the case of group health plans which provide both medical and surgical benefits and mental health or substance use disorder benefits, there [is] parity between the two categories of benefits.”

In 2020, Congress amended MHPAEA to require plan sponsors and issuers to perform and document comparative analyses of certain nonquantitative treatment limitations.

The lawsuit is Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Independence Administrators.

Neither representatives of Independence Administrators nor those for the DOL responded to requests for comment.

«