DOL Issues Guidance for Investors, Plans on Investment Advice Exemption

It sets forth questions an investor can ask potential advice providers and information to help them understand the purpose of each question.

The Department of Labor (DOL)’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) has released guidance on fiduciary investment advice for retirement investors, employee benefit plans and investment advice providers. The DOL first announced the fiduciary prohibited transaction exemption (PTE), called “Improving Investment Advice for Workers & Retirees,” on February 12, and it went into effect four days later, on February 16.

At the time the PTE was announced, officials said it “allowed for important investor protections, including a stringent ‘best interest’ standard of care for fiduciary recommendations of rollovers from ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act]-protected retirement accounts.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The new guidance consists of two documents, the first being “Choosing the Right Person to Give You Investment Advice: Information for Investors in Retirement Plans.” It sets forth questions an investor can ask potential advice providers, information to help them understand the purpose of each question and frequently asked questions about the exemption.

The second document provides guidance for investment advice providers that want to rely on the exemption.

“The retirement investor guidance provides helpful information regarding the importance of selecting an investment advice provider who is a fiduciary, and the protections that are provided to retirement investors under the ‘Improving Investment Advice for Workers & Retirees’ exemption,” said Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employee Benefits Security Ali Khawar. “The compliance-focused frequently asked questions provide assistance to financial institutions and investment professionals as they ramp up compliance with the exemption.”

Allianz Targeted by Raytheon in Fiduciary Breach Lawsuit

The complaint suggests Allianz abandoned a hedging strategy that was the supposed cornerstone of an investment fund utilized by the Raytheon pension plan, resulting in unexpected losses. 

Plaintiffs have filed a new Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Allianz Global Investors.

Distinguishing the case from many of the numerous ERISA suits filed in the past several years, the plaintiffs in the suit are not retirement plan participants but instead are members of the Raytheon Technologies Corporation Pension Administration and Investment Committee. In their complaint, the plaintiffs suggest Allianz mismanaged a fund called the AllianzGI Structured Alpha U.S. Equity 500 LLC, allegedly leading to hundreds of millions of dollars in losses on behalf of the Raytheon pension plan.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“Allianz courted retirement plans to invest in the fund, promising them that structural risk protections were the cornerstone of the Structured Alpha strategy,” the complaint states. “While the fund was designed to generate returns through an options trading strategy, Allianz promised that hedges would be in place ‘at all times’ to cap the downside risk of that strategy. Allianz told investors that these hedges would limit investment losses to a ‘defined maximum loss,’ afford ‘reinsurance’ against a market crash, and eliminate the risk of a margin call.”

According to the complaint, Allianz also promised that it would never forecast the direction of the market or market volatility, that Structured Alpha’s investment strategy was “non-directional,” and that it would “perform whether equity markets are up or down, smooth or volatile.” The plaintiffs say these claimed risk protections were critical to the decision by the plan’s fiduciaries to invest assets in Allianz’s Structured Alpha investment strategy.

“Yet when equity markets declined, volatility spiked and the fund’s option positions were exposed to a heightened risk of loss in February and March 2020, Allianz’s promised protections were absent,” the complaint alleges. “Unbeknownst to the plan fiduciary or anyone at Raytheon, and in violation of Allianz’s stated investment strategy and the fiduciary duties it owed under ERISA, Allianz had abandoned the hedging strategy that was the supposed cornerstone of Structured Alpha, leaving the portfolio almost entirely unhedged against a spike in market volatility.”

The complaint goes on to allege that Allianz placed a directional bet that volatility would remain relatively low even as the pandemic struck in the U.S. The plaintiffs call this “the equivalent of a ticking time bomb if its forecast (one it had promised ‘never’ to make) proved false.”

“As Allianz has since admitted, it constructed the fund’s portfolio to offer no downside protection against the market decline and volatility spike that occurred in February and March 2020,” the complaint alleges. “Contrary to its promise to investors that it would always purchase hedges as ‘reinsurance’ for the options it sold, Allianz had purchased no hedges for an entire segment of the portfolio. Meanwhile, the so-called hedges that Allianz did purchase were not the hedges Allianz said it would buy.”

Allianz Global Investors shared the following statement regarding the lawsuit: “As we set out at the time, the Structured Alpha portfolio sustained losses during the severe market rout in late February and March. While the losses were disappointing, the allegations made by Raytheon Technologies Corporation Pension Administration and Investment Committee are–like other plaintiffs’–legally and factually flawed, and AllianzGI will defend itself vigorously against them.”

Allianz has not yet responded to a request for comment about the complaint, but it has responded to similar allegations leveled in related lawsuits filed in recent months.

«