DOL Publishes FAQs on Emergency Savings Accounts

The document clarifies acceptable investments, the $2,500 limit and other items for the feature enabled by SECURE 2.0 legislation that is debuting this year.

The Department of Labor on Wednesday published regulatory guidance on pension-linked emergency savings accounts in the form of an FAQ.

PLESAs, sometimes called sidecar accounts, were created by the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 and are tied to a defined contribution retirement plan. A PLESA balance is capped at $2,500, and participants may withdraw from the account at their own discretion without paying a 10% early withdrawal fee.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The SECURE 2.0 provision creating them, Section 127, took effect on January 1 and is intended to increase in-plan liquidity for unforeseen expenses. PLESAs are an optional feature; Section 115 of SECURE 2.0 also allows for one penalty-free withdrawal of up to $1,000 per year from a 401(k) account for emergencies.

Participants are not required to prove a hardship, or even be experiencing one, to take money from a PLESA; withdrawals may be taken at “the discretion of the participant.”

Although Section 127 went into effect this year, plan sponsors, advisers and recordkeepers have been seeking further guidance on the optional plan benefit. Earlier this month, the IRS issued guidance, and the DOL further clarified some items in its FAQ.

Eligible Participants

The DOL’s notice explained that if a participant is eligible for a qualified plan offered by the employer and is not a highly compensated employee, then the participant is eligible for a PLESA if the employer offers one. The threshold to qualify as “highly compensated” is $155,000 for 2024.

Further, plans may automatically enroll participants in a PLESA, but they cannot mandate their participation and must provide at least 30 days in which the participant may opt out. If a plan elects to automatically enroll participants into a PLESA, the automatic percentage may not exceed 3% of the participant’s compensation.

The FAQ also says that PLESAs cannot have a minimum contribution or account balance, nor impose penalties for this purpose. Employers may, however, require that contributions take the form of whole percentage points or whole dollar amounts for administrative simplicity.

A sponsor may also charge reasonable fees for recordkeeping and administration of a PLESA, according to the DOL, but these fees must be in keeping with fiduciary requirements under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The sponsor may not impose withdrawal fees for the first four withdrawals in a calendar year, but they may impose reasonable offsetting fees for subsequent withdrawals.

Ceiling Explanation

The DOL also clarified how sponsors should interpret the $2,500 ceiling on a PLESA’s balance. A sponsor may limit the total balance attributed to the participant’s contributions at $2,500; alternatively, they may also freeze employee contributions once the account balance reaches $2,500, regardless of how much of that balance is attributable to contributions and how much is to asset appreciation. In both cases, however, asset appreciation can carry the total balance of the PLESA greater than $2,500, in keeping with the IRS guidance on PLESAs.

Investment Options

Lastly, the DOL clarified what types of investments are suitable for a PLESA: A sponsor may use cash, an interest-bearing account or “an investment product designed to maintain over the term of the investment the dollar value that is equal to the amount invested in the product and preserve principal and provide a reasonable rate of return, whether or not such return is guaranteed, consistent with the need for liquidity.”

PLESA investments may not have major liquidity constraints, such as surrender fees, according to the FAQ.

Released on January 12, IRS guidance focused on limiting potential abuses of the PLESA system by participants who contribute to a PLESA solely in the interest of collecting a matching contribution to their retirement plan before immediately withdrawing their own contribution. The IRS is soliciting feedback until April 5 on reasonable methods to limit this practice.

Market Strong for Plan Sponsors to De-Risk DB Plans, According to Agilis

The pension and investments manager expects de-risking strategies to remain attractive in 2024.

Actuarial consultant and investment specialist Agilis Partners LLC expects a substantial increase in defined benefit plan terminations of frozen plans in 2024.

The firm’s DB market analysts pointed to the effect of volatile discount rates, used to value the cost of future pension obligations, as a reason for plan sponsors to take advantage of positive funding status to de-risk their plans. While discount rates fell “sharply” in the latter two months of the year, strong markets generally left pension plans better funded at the end of 2023 than one year prior, according to Michael Clark, managing director at Agilis.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

“All plan sponsors should be considering risk transfer strategies like lump sum cash-out windows or annuity buyouts,” Clark says by email.

“The lump sum opportunities are a function of the interest rate basis used to calculate the lump sum present values, which for many plans will be based on high quality corporate bond yield rates from September and October 2023,” Clark adds. “Given that those were much higher than where yields are at today, there may be an economic advantage to settling pension liabilities via lump sum payments in 2024 when the amount paid out is less than the liability released from their books. If interest rates stay steady or decline in 2024 this will continue to be an attractive de-risking opportunity.

Agilis, which provides pension de-risking services, made the following arguments for plan sponsors to take de-risking actions in 2024:

  • Lump sum payout campaigns should be economically attractive for most plan sponsors when considering certain active employees and in-pay retirees;
  • Pension risk transfers via annuity buy-outs will continue to be attractive, in part due to the strength of annuity payouts on higher interest rates;
  • With the prospect of lower interest rates, now is a good time to explore investment-related solutions to protect funded status gains achieved in 2023; and
  • Sponsors with frozen defined benefit plans will want to give serious consideration to potential plan termination.

“Plan terminations and retiree carveouts continue to remain attractive,” Tom Cassara, CEO of Agilis, stated in a press release “First quarter annuity purchases are already looking strong, and additional insurers are considering entering the pension risk transfer market. This would increase competition, open up capacity, and drive attractive pricing for plan sponsors looking to derisk their pension plans in the future.”

Agilis provides actuarial and investment consulting focused on options that incorporate outsourced CIO actuarial and investment consulting; derivatives management; specialty investment management strategies; pension administration services; annuity buyouts and plan terminations; and pooled employer 401(k) consulting.

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.