DoL Seeks Restoration for ESOP Plan of SC Company

June 27, 2006 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The Department of Labor (DoL) has brought a lawsuit against Hagemeyer North America Inc. in South Carolina, claiming participants suffered more than $1 million in losses when the company's employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) purchased shares at inflated prices.

According to the DoL announcement, the US District Court for the District of South Carolina has combined its suit with a private suit brought by employees of Cameron & Barkley Company, now part of Hagemeyer.

The combined suit alleges that Hagemeyer North America Inc., GreatBanc Trust Company  and members of the plan’s administrative and advisory committees violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by mismanaging two ESOPs sponsored by the Cameron & Barkley and Cambar Software Inc.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The alleged violations to the ESOP occurred when Cameron & Barkley merged with Hagemeyer in 2000, the announcement said. Cambar Software was not part of the merger, and its employees’ ESOP accounts were spun off into a new ESOP.

The DoL is seeking a court order requiring the defendants to restore to the plan all losses with interest, return any illegal profits received by them and undo any transactions prohibited by federal benefits law. The suit also asks that there be an accounting of the escrow monies and appropriate allocation of funds with interest to the Cameron & Barkley and Cambar Software ESOPs.

Court Holds Administrator Liable for Relationship with Known Embezzler

June 26, 2006 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a health fund administrator breached her fiduciary duties by continuing the fund's relationship with someone who previously embezzled $475,517 in employer contributions from the fund.

In doing so the court refused to overturn an injunction that restricted health fund administrator Sandra Briand from serving as a plan fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

The appeals court held that Briand knew when she became administrator that Clarke Lasky had embezzled money from the fund and made an agreement with Joseph Merino, the former administrator of the fund and Briand’s husband, to repay the diverted funds. The court said that Briand only ended Lasky’s relationship with the fund after he had embezzled an additional $177,271.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The US District Court for the Eastern District of New York held that Briand and Merino breached their fiduciary duties as defined by ERISA, and held they were together liable for $352,271 in losses to the International Brotherhood of Industrial Workers Health and Welfare Fund.

Briand and Merino appealed the lower court’s decision, claiming that it was wrong in its finding that they breached their fiduciary duties. And Briand argued that even if the fiduciary duties were breached, it did not result in losses to the funds.

The appeals court  opinion in Chao v. Merino said that even though Briand took swift action after Lasky again embezzled money, she had an obligation to take “precautionary steps to limit Lasky’s ability to embezzle from the fund” when she became a fiduciary in 1994. The court said that Briand “knew that Lasky had on three earlier occasions wrongfully withheld employer contributions from a benefit fund” and “that Lasky could not be trusted.”

The appeals court also said that under ERISA, a fiduciary that breaches his or her responsibilities “shall be personally liable to make good to such plan any losses to the plan resulting from each such breach.” The district court held Briand liable for the $177,271 embezzled after her appointment as administrator.  

«