Early Savers Fare Well with Workplace Plans

July 22, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A secure retirement is achievable, research says, if retirement plan participants start saving early and consistently—and at levels far above 3%.

Americans with access to 401(k) plans can achieve a more secure retirement if they begin in their 20s and save consistently over the course of their career, according to findings from the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at Boston College. The latest National Retirement Risk Index (NRRI) from CRR was sponsored by Prudential Financial Inc.

Individuals with a workplace-based retirement plan should look to that plan, whether it’s a 401(k) or other retirement savings plan, for 35% of their retirement income, on average, the CCR study contends.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The average required savings rate to achieve that level of targeted income is 14%—that is, if savings starts at age 35 and retirement occurs at age 65, according to “How Much Should People Save?” The research was designed to determine the amount 401(k)s would need to generate for working-age American households to be able to maintain their standard of living in retirement.

“Planning for Retirement: The Role of 401(k)s in Retirement Income,” a Prudential paper, summarizes the NRRI research and notes the improvements to 401(k)s since they were introduced as supplemental savings vehicles in 1978.

The research helps to highlight the strength of the existing retirement system, according to James McInnes, senior vice president of product management and development at Prudential Retirement, and co-author of Prudential’s paper. “Modern plan design allows individuals to get tax-advantaged savings and the ease of payroll deduction, as well as investment education, advice and institutionally priced products to help provide them the opportunity to better prepare for a more secure retirement,” McInnes says.

Improved Plan Features

Prudential’s paper highlights three features of 401(k) plans that help improve retirement security. Matching contributions and auto enrollment have boosted incentives to save and made it easier to do so. Retirement modeling tools, which project future retirement income, can improve savings behavior by increasing savings rates.

The NRRI model assumes that households start saving at age 35 and retire at age 65. The research also found that the required savings rate for an average wage earner in a single income household drops from 15% to 10%, if the individual starts saving at age 25, instead of age 35.

When the target retirement age is changed to age 67—the retirement age of Social Security for those born after 1959—the average required savings rate (starting at age 35) drops from 15% to 12%. When the retirement age is further delayed to age 70, the average rate drops to 6%. If approaches are combined, with savings starting at age 25 and retirement occurring at age 70, the required savings rate drops to 4%.

“Even small changes in savings behavior can have a positive impact on individuals’ results,” McInnes says. “This research shows it is never too late to start saving, and even if you didn’t begin at age 25, saving a little more now or extending retirement can still get you to a comfortable place.”

Employers can help their workforce achieve their retirement savings goals by ensuring they take advantage of the employer-match provided, offering automatic enrollment and providing participants with the proper tools, says George Castineiras, senior vice president, total retirement solutions, at Prudential Retirement, and one of the authors of the Prudential paper.

CCR’s paper “How Much Should People Save?” can be downloaded here. The paper’s co-authors are Alicia Munnell, the center’s director; Anthony Webb, a senior research economist at the center; and Wenliang Hou, a research associate at the center.

“Planning for Retirement: The Role of 401(k)s in Retirement Income” is available on Prudential’s website.

Wagner Law Group Adds ERISA Specialist

July 22, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Stephen Rosenberg, an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and labor law litigator, has joined The Wagner Law Group.

Rosenberg joins the firm as “of counsel,” a title given to an attorney who has a relationship with a law firm or other organization but is not an associate or a partner. Rosenberg has extensive experience as an ERISA lawyer, the firm says, and has litigated a wide range of denial of benefit, breach of fiduciary duty, and class action cases related to retirement plans. He has also represented and advised company benefit plans on operational issues impacting participants, plan sponsors and plan advisers.

Rosenberg will be joined at Wagner Law Group by his associate, Caroline Fiore, with whom he has had a multi-decade working relationship. Fiore is a commercial and regulatory lawyer with a background in administrative law, commercial litigation, insurance, class action, employee benefits and ERISA disputes. She has extensive experience working on cases involving breach of fiduciary duty and denial of benefit claims under ERISAincluding claims under 401(k), employee stock ownership and disability plans.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Rosenberg and Fiore will work closely with David Gabor, who was named a new partner at the firm, effective August 1. As partner, Gabor will be called on to head the firm’s employment and labor law department, as well as the litigation department. Gabor, who formerly held an of counsel role with the firm, has long-term experience representing clients in litigation, negotiating and drafting benefits contracts, and handling compliance issues.

Marcia Wagner, managing director of The Wagner Law Group, says the new hires are meant to bring “a complimentary set of extremely strong skills in employment law, human resources, counseling clients and litigation” to the firm.

More information on The Wagner Law Group is available here.

— Matthew Miselis

 

«