Employers Can Offer Financial Help to Participants Without Dipping Into Retirement Savings

Because the coronavirus was designated a disaster under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, qualified disaster relief payments are permitted.

To help with employees’ financial wellness while the nation experiences repercussions from the outbreak of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, employers may want to consider implementing a qualified disaster relief payment program under Internal Revenue Code Section 139.

An alert from law firm DuaneMorris says that as a result of COVID-19 being designated a disaster under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, employers are permitted to make tax-free reimbursements and payments to employees under Internal Revenue Code Section 139. “There are many potential categories of expenses that could be triggered in the COVID-19 context and reimbursed under Code Section 139―including, but not limited to, medical expenses, child care expenses due to school closures and increased home expenses (including increased utility expenses). The only limitation under Code Section 139 is that such expenses related to COVID-19 must be ‘reasonable and necessary,’” the alert says.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The law firm warns that wage replacement is never permissible and is always treated as a taxable wage. Therefore, Code Section 139 cannot be used as a wage replacement alternative. Qualified disaster relief payments are generally deductible by the employer, are not subject to any federal withholding obligations and do not need to be reported on a Form W-2.

Code Section 139 does not require a written plan document, but the law firm recommends that employers adopt one. The alert says the IRS previously approved a written program in Revenue Ruling 2003-12, so it is viewed as a best practice to have a written program to support the favorable tax treatment under Code Section 139. And employees should be informed of the availability and parameters of such a program.

“Any policy or program adopted by an employer must outline the features of the program, including limiting payments to those that are ‘reasonable and necessary’ in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, describing the eligible employee class or group and listing expenses that will be subject to reimbursement or payment,” the alert says.

401(k) Plan Fiduciaries to Pay for Failure to Remit Participant Loan Repayments

A court judgment requires the fiduciaries to not only restore the unremitted repayments to the plan, but also $16,782.80 in interest on the unremitted loan repayments.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has issued a default judgment requiring defendants JWK Corp., its chief executive officer and the director of operations to restore $103,098 to the company’s 401(k) plan.

A Department of Labor (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) investigation that found that from July 15, 2013, to September 30, 2016, the plan fiduciaries violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) when they withheld employee loan repayments and failed to remit them to the company’s 401(k) Salary Savings Plan.

The default judgment requires the defendants to restore $86,315 to the plan, plus $16,782.80 in interest on the unremitted loan repayments. The judgment also removes the defendants as plan fiduciaries and appoints an independent fiduciary to terminate the plan and distribute the plan’s assets to the 25 participants. In addition, it permanently enjoins the defendants from serving as fiduciaries to any ERISA-covered plan.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

«