Employers Expanding Voluntary Benefits, Post-ACA

November 20, 2012 (PLANSPONSOR.com) In a post-Affordable Care Act (ACA) environment, employers are expanding voluntary benefits and shifting benefit decisionmaking to employees.

As a way to maintain or increase employee benefit offerings while controlling costs, employers are expanding the range of employee-paid voluntary benefits offered to employees. Three in four employers report that their top reason for offerings voluntary benefits is to expand the benefits options available to their employees, according to a Prudential white paper, “Optimizing Employee Benefits in the Post-Health Care Reform Environment.”

Within the next two years, 71% of finance executives indicate they are likely to replace some employer-paid benefits with voluntary benefits, and 69% indicate that they expect to expand the range of voluntary benefits offered.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

In a post-ACA world, a trend should gain traction for employers to differentiate their benefits by offering voluntary benefits such as life, disability and critical illness insurances, said Jim Klein, president and CEO of the American Benefits Council (ABC), during Prudential’s “Health vs. Wealth” media briefing on the data. “This is really a pivotal time in the life of employee benefits,” Klein said. “As benefits become more similar … health care could become more commoditized.”

A CFO.com research survey found 79% of finance executives agree that employee benefits are critical for attracting and retaining employees, and 76% said employee satisfaction with benefits is critical for their company’s success.

Dallas Salisbury, president and CEO of the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), said the ACA will increase employees’ expectation of company benefits, as well as the education surrounding them. Even if employees choose the insurance exchanges, plan sponsors can still play a role in educating them on how to best select benefits, he added.

Plan sponsors should personalize their benefits-related messages to employees, taking factors like age and gender into consideration. More than 80% of people want a personalized experience when it comes to financial advice, said James Gemus, senior vice president, group life and voluntary benefits at Prudential Group Insurance. 

Employees particularly need assistance choosing voluntary benefits because they find it difficult to choose benefits based on possible future events, Gemus said. For example, about half of surveyed individuals say life insurance is too complicated to purchase. Voluntary benefits like disability are also vital, as Salisbury pointed out one in four people in their early 20s will experience a period of disability by age 67.

Voluntary benefit communications and education should include true stories and case studies that establish the need for protection against key risks and connect those needs to specific solutions, according to Prudential’s white paper, "Voluntary Benefits: A Critical Tool For Improving Employees’ Financial Wellness."

Communication and education may help employees overcome the notion that life insurance is more relevant for covering funeral costs and final expenses than for replacing a lost income, the white paper said. Education about the importance of voluntary benefits is crucial to maintain financial wellness, Salisbury said, as LIMRA research indicates that 70% of U.S. families would be financially challenged if the breadwinner died or became disabled.

According to Prudential’s research, employees most prefer to receive their benefits communication information via workplace email (55%), followed by group meetings or seminars during the work day (49%). Coming in last is webinars at 13%. 

Post-ACA Health and Wellness 

Another trend in the post-ACA world is an increase in the development and promotion of wellness programs. Wellness initiatives can improve employees' health, which in turn reduces health care costs and improves productivity.

Nearly seven in 10 chief financial officers agree that promoting healthy behaviors and building a culture of health is a priority within their companies, according to Prudential's white paper on optimizing employee benefits. To that end, 47% of employees are currently increasing their use of wellness programs. According to the white paper, a key provision of the ACA is expected to accelerate this trend because employers will be able to vary health care premiums by up to 30% based on whether employees participate in the wellness programs.

A third trend expected as a result of ACA is the shifting of more responsibility for health care costs to employees. To restrain the growth of health care benefits, nearly two-thirds (65%) of finance executives are likely to shift more responsibility for health care costs to employees, according to the white paper.

Employers are increasingly offering account-based health plans (ABHPs) that pair a health insurance plain with a savings account as a way to give more responsibility to employees. To save costs, employers generally offer high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), and employees pay part or all of their deductible through their savings account. By 2014, 33% of employers are very likely to offer an HDHP as their default plan option, and 26% are very likely to offer it as their only plan option, the white paper said.

Despite changes that may occur in a post-ACA world, "employers [and employees] still value having employee benefits," Gemus concluded.

Reenrollment in QDIA Helps Diversification

November 20, 2012 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Reenrollment in a QDIA can help improve plan diversification, according to a Vanguard research paper.

The Vanguard report, “Improving plan diversification through reenrollment in a QDIA,” notes that even though most defined contribution (DC) plans offer a broad range of prudent investment offerings, plan sponsors find that some participants make portfolio construction errors, concentrating their investments in employer stock, in specific asset classes or styles, or holding overly conservative or aggressive portfolios. Reenrollment through which the plan sponsor defaults participants’ assets and future contributions into the plan’s designated qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) can fix these errors. 

Vanguard researched the effect of reenrollment on a large DC plan in 2008 and found that reenrollment immediately improved the portfolio diversification in the plan. Immediately following the initial reenrollment effort, 92% of the participants maintained either a full (74%) or partial (18%) position in the age-based target-date fund. This result was particularly striking in that the communications program strongly encouraged participants to take proactive action on their own. One year later, 87% of participants still maintained either a partial or full position in the target-date approach. It was their sole investment (61%) or part of their portfolio (26%).

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The day after reenrollment, the stable value exposure fell from 26% to 3% and the average company stock exposure fell from 20% to 2%. Reducing these exposures was one of the goals of the reenrollment. Assets in these options flowed (through the default target-date funds) to domestic equities, bonds and international equities.  

Plan sponsors need to weigh a variety of issues before proceeding with a reenrollment strategy. They should consider the effect of reenrollment on diversification and return potential, and also on risk levels. For some participants, improving portfolio diversification can mean improving long-term expected returns and increasing risk levels; for others, it can mean a reduction in both.

A plan sponsor’s decision to reenroll participants into the QDIA may relate to a specific investment option, a subgroup of participants, or the entire plan. In these instances, the sponsor implements such a change to enhance participant portfolio diversification and improve expected long-term retirement outcomes for participants.

A sponsor changing service providers may also make substantial changes in its investment menu. In lieu of attempting to map participant holdings from one set of investment options to another reasonably similar set of options, the sponsor can choose to default participants into the QDIA during the conversion process. Under certain circumstances, a sponsor may decide to make substantial changes to the plan’s investment lineup or eliminate a number of options. Rather than attempting to map those participants in the options being eliminated to similar new options, the sponsor may instead default the participants into a QDIA.

Under reenrollment, as long as participants are given proper advance notice and are provided an opportunity to make an alternative election, sponsors enjoy fiduciary protection in connection with participant investments—either because participants are transferred into the QDIA, or because they exercise control by opting out of the reenrollment. In addition to this fiduciary protection, the plan sponsor has taken affirmative steps to ensure proper diversification of participant accounts.

The research paper is available here.

«