Employers Increase Focus on Financial Well-Being, but Study Reveals Gaps

A recent study shows that while employees are most worried about day-to-day expenses, companies are prioritizing long-term retirement benefits.

Companies across the U.S. and Canada have increasingly prioritized well-being programs for their employees since 2020, data from global professional services firm Aon shows.

While the data demonstrates that employers are recognizing the overall correlation between employees’ well-being and their performance, it also shows some disconnect between what employers think is important to the business, what employees say they need and what programs are being offered.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Aon’s 2022-2023 Global Wellbeing Survey found that employees’ most common financial stressors, such as day-to-day expenses and economic volatility, are not being prioritized by their companies.

Employee well-being encompasses one’s overall physical, emotional, social, career and financial health. Aon’s surveys of employees over the past year showed that employees who agree strongly that their organization cares about their well-being are 1.5 times more likely to stay with that employer.

The survey showed that 70% of companies in North America say well-being is more important than in 2020, compared to 63% globally, and 39% of companies have integrated a well-being strategy into their overall business and talent strategy.

“What we know about wellbeing is that initiatives and strategies aren’t enough,” Aon stated in its report. “A wellbeing strategy that is integrated with the larger company strategy is truly what makes a difference.”

In North America, 52% of companies that responded to the survey said they have increased their investment in well-being programs, compared to 43% globally. But that investment may not be wisely spent, as Aon reported that only 32% of these companies said their programs perform well.

Employee well-being was reported as a top priority in the next five years for companies in North America, trailing only attracting and retaining talent, according to the survey.

The five well-being issues that employees most often face, according to the survey, include mental and emotional health; burnout/languishing (i.e. reaction to prolonged or chronic job stress); working environment/culture; virtual and hybrid work support; and financial risk and stress.

The survey identified current salary and compensation; economic volatility; the ability to pay bills; and the affordability of goods and services among the most significant common financial stresses that employees experience.

However, Aon’s survey showed that the bulk of employers’ financial initiatives focus on retirement savings, even though employees are far more concerned with more immediate financial needs, such as student loans, creating an emergency fund and managing everyday expenses.

According to the survey, company offerings under the umbrella of financial well-being included three long-term options in the top 10: saving for retirement (34%) first, pensions (28%) fourth and providing financial advice (21%) seventh. Meanwhile, day-to-day money management was the least mentioned of the 15 options, emergency funds were only a few spots higher, and credit and debt management ranked low as well, all at about 15%.

“Organizations also need the employees’ perspective on what matters to them,” Aon states in the report.

Annamaria Lusardi, the founder and academic director of the Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center, told PLANSPONSOR she recommends that firms take a “holistic approach” to well-being programs that cover the many financial decisions employees may face.

“One size does not fit all, and problems extend well beyond retirement savings,” Lusardi says. “These programs are a win-win, employers benefit too from them because employees are less distracted at work and more financially secure.”

Lusardi also points out that data from the TIAA Institute GFLEC Personal Finance Index shows that employees spend an average of seven hours per week thinking about and dealing with issues and problems related to personal finances, and three of these hours occur at work. For those with low financial literacy, the totals rise to 12 and seven hours, respectively.

These personal finance issues that employees deal with include not just lack of retirement savings, but also debt problems and emergencies, Lusardi says.

The Aon Global Wellbeing Survey was conducted in partnership with polling company Ipsos. More than 1,100 companies from a variety of industries participated in the survey. Surveys were conducted over a 10-week period from August to November 2022.

House Votes to Overturn Rule Allowing ESG Investing in Retirement Plans

The resolution next moves to the Democratic-majority Senate.

The U.S. House of Representatives approved a resolution to overturn a Department of Labor rule passed in November 2022 allowing for, but not mandating, environmental, social and governance investing in retirement plans.

The Congressional Review Act resolution passed by a party-line vote of 216 to 204 on Tuesday, with one Democrat voting with Republican lawmakers. Representative Andy Barr, R-Kentucky, offered the resolution amid calls by Republican House and Senate members in recent months for a repeal of the DOL guidance, saying it would harm everyday retirement savers.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“Proud to join @HouseGOP in passing @RepAndy401Barr’s resolution today to STOP the left from pushing woke, ESG policies upon retirees without their consent,” Debbie Lesko, R-Arizona, wrote on Twitter after the vote.

The resolution now advances to the Senate, which has a 51-49 Democratic majority, though Senator Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia, has publicly sided with Republicans against the rule and called for its repeal. Vice President Kamala Harris can serve as a tiebreaker.

Both national and state Republican lawmakers have publicly opposed ESG investing in recent months, including 25 state attorneys general, fossil fuel-linked companies, and academics filing a complaint in a Texas court against the DOL’s rule in January. Last week, a conservative nonprofit law firm filed another complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, which was quickly followed by new legislation by House Democrats to codify the rule.

Immediately following Tuesday’s House vote, the Congressional Sustainable Investment Caucus led by Representatives Sean Casten, D-Illinois, and Juan Vargas, D-California, came out against the resolution.

“Retirement plan fiduciaries should be free to consider climate change and other ESG factors without regulatory barriers or the threat of litigation,” they wrote in a statement. “The rule from the Department of Labor does not require fiduciaries to consider ESG factors, it merely allows them to do so if it is in the best interest of their plan participants. This CRA resolution is the latest dangerous move in Republican’s (sic) anti-worker and anti-free market agenda.”

On Monday, a group led by organization US SIF: The Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment called for House members to vote against the resolution. The organization, backed by asset management firms focused on ESG investing, noted that the rule does not mandate use of ESG, but instead provides it as an option for retirement plan fiduciaries and sponsors governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

“The rule re-affirms ERISA’s longstanding principle that the duties of prudence and loyalty require ERISA plan fiduciaries to focus on relevant risk-return factors and not subordinate the interests of participants and beneficiaries such as by sacrificing investment returns or taking on additional investment risk,” the organization wrote.

The DOL rule was passed under the administration of President Joe Biden after more than a year of deliberation and public comment. Ultimately, the department decided to allow workplace retirement plan providers and their advisers to consider ESG factors when designing plan investments, saying at the time the rule would “make workers’ retirement savings and pensions more resilient by removing needless barriers, and ending the chilling effect created by the prior administration on considering environmental, social and governance factors in investments.”

The DOL’s 2022 rule overturned a rule from the administration of President Donald Trump that plan fiduciaries could only consider “pecuniary” factors, leaving many fiduciaries to question whether ESG-focused investments could be added to retirement plans as a qualified default investment alternative.

«