Employers Tout Cost Savings from HSAs

November 10, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The “2011 Employer and Account Holder Surveys,” commissioned by ACS, a Xerox Company, and conducted by Buck Consultants, show a majority of small employers (77%) believe that High Deductible Health Plans (HDHP) with a Health Savings Account (HSA) are key in controlling health care costs.

HDHPs are less costly to employers for both individual and family coverage. Employers report the cost of providing HSA-qualified plans is less than the cost of providing a standard Preferred Provider Organization (PPO). The average direct cost to provide an HDHP/HSA is $5,469 for individual coverage and $9,909 for family coverage. In comparison, the average PPO cost is $7,158 for individuals and $10,691 for family.  

According to a press release, surveyed employers are extremely committed to offering employer-sponsored health insurance for the foreseeable future, and are equally committed to retain their HSA-qualified plans. Only 6% stated that they are at least very likely to discontinue offering the HSA-qualified plan in the future. And, only 7% of employers stated that they would be at least very likely to move employees to future health care exchanges.  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Other findings of the Employer Survey include: 

  • The average employer that implemented an HDHP and HSA program has 49% of eligible employees enrolled in the HDHP; 
  • Sixty-nine percent of employer respondents contributed to their employees’ HSA accounts; and 
  • Employers’ contributions to HSAs average $1,000 for individual coverage and $1,500 for family coverage. 

Employees Cite HSA Benefits Too  

The “2011 Employer and Account Holder Surveys,” commissioned by ACS, a Xerox Company, and conducted by Buck Consultants, show more than half (56%) of Health Savings Account (HSA) account holders have found that their HSA-qualified plan provides an affordable health care option.  

HSAs put consumers in the driver’s seat when it comes to managing their health services and care. Three-quarters of respondents say the ability personally to control their own health costs is an “extremely” or “very” important benefit of HSAs. Not only are account holders setting aside more money than before they had an HSA to cover potential medical costs (54%), but they are also engaging in healthier lifestyle choices (18%), researching preventive care programs (18%), shopping for lower priced prescription drugs (28%), and planning health care better throughout the year (31%). Individuals perceive that they consume medical services at approximately the same rate but are shopping for care more than before.  

Other findings of the Account Holder Survey include: 

  • Seventy-two percent of account holders indicated that they actively chose the HSA-qualified plan although other plan options exist for them; 
  • Eighty-two percent of account holders surveyed reported that the ability to save tax-free money was “extremely” or “very” important in selecting an HSA-qualified plan; 
  • Seventy-nine percent of respondents state that having an HSA is valuable to them; and  
  • Sixty-four percent of respondents state that their HDHP/HSA combination meets their family’s needs. 

The surveys, commissioned in the fall of this year by ACS and conducted by Buck Consultants, both of which are Xerox companies, generated more than 14,000 existing account holder and 300 employer responses.

Pension Fund Sues U.S. Bancorp over Investor Losses on CDOs

November 10, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – The Oklahoma Police Pension Fund has sued U.S. Bancorp over allegations that investors in mortgage bonds were hurt by the bank failing to ensure that securities were backed by loans, reports Bloomberg.  

According to the article, the Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System claims U.S. Bancorp knew mortgage loans underlying the bonds were not properly transferred to trusts, which caused investors to suffer millions of dollars in losses.

The mortgage loans were pooled and securitized by Bear Stearns, the investment bank that was acquired by JPMorgan Chase & Co. The pension fund claims, as the trustee for the two trusts at issue in the lawsuit, U.S. Bancorp was required to take steps to ensure the securities sold to investors were properly backed by mortgages.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The fund said the bank was required to take physical possession of documents in mortgage-loan files and review the files for any defects. Transfer of the proper documentation was needed for the trusts to take ownership of the loans.

U.S. Bancorp’s failures meant securities purchased by investors “were not, in fact, legally collateralized by mortgage loans,” according to the court filing.

The pension fund filed the complaint as a class-action, and seeks to represent other investors.

The case is Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System v. U.S. Bank National Association, No: 11-08066. 

«