Engaging K-12 Employees With Retirement Saving in a Changed Environment

A mix of virtual and in-person education and planning, along with digital tools, is helping meet the needs of K-12 retirement plan sponsors and participants in a hybrid world.

Providers and advisers for K-12 school districts had to come up with creative ways to engage employees with their retirement plans and financial wellness during the pandemic, and as the new school year starts, they are preparing again for changes.

“There was a completely disruptive environment last year, the likes of which no one had to deal with before,” says Bernie Heffernon, divisional vice president in group retirement at Equitable. “There was retooling not only from our industry, but by school systems as well.”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

He says both industries have adapted and school systems regionally are taking different approaches this year—in some areas they will still have remote learning, and in some areas, it will be in person. “We want to be able to provide our products and services in the new environment in a way that’s useful for them,” Heffernon says.

As some K-12 schools have already started, many teachers and staff members are excited to get back to their natural environment, Heffernon notes. During the orientation before the start of the school year, he says he’s seeing a good amount of connection not only with school year planning but also with benefits planning.

“We’re still doing some remote education and planning, as we’re finding the majority of clients are gravitating toward a hybrid model,” Heffernon says. “When it comes to plan enrollments, however, there is a desire to have face-to-face enrollment meetings with advisers for education about plan provisions and to help set a course for them to achieve their goals.” He notes that schools are asking advisers to respect the rules for their campuses.

For ongoing services such as asset reallocations and contribution increases, K-12 school system employees are much more comfortable handling those virtually than in the past, he adds. Heffernon says one advantage of using a hybrid model is the ability to have on-site visits with employees while also being able to include partners and spouses in virtual sessions.

“Our success comes from creating a partnership [with employees] rather than being just a ‘vendor,’” Heffernon says. “I think employees are more successful when they feel we are a partner.”

Freda Lee, senior vice president, head of relationship management for AIG Retirement Services, also says she feels a sense of excitement among K-12 staff about returning to school, after the disruption caused by the pandemic. She sees it as a great opportunity to get new hires and other staff members excited about retirement planning as well, and provide them with the tools they need.

“We’ve been focused on how to make education and other resources available to plan participants whether they are returning to school in person or whether they’ll be virtual,” Lee says. “We’re also focused on making resources available to plan sponsors. It’s important to be able to offer them the tools they need to reach employees.”

Lee says that earlier in the summer, as school districts started to plan for the school year, many engaged AIG to schedule in-person meetings with employees. “We are prepared to return to in-person, but we also continue to do virtual meetings, as needs differ by district,” she says, adding that AIG provides workshops as well as individual meetings.

One of things Equitable is finding to be successful is what it calls a “virtual sit.” “We have a location on campus but are able to do virtual meetings with staff. We can meet with the math pod, the biology pod, etc.,” Heffernon explains. “We are trying to minimize disruption while maximizing effectiveness. And staff can interact with us in the way they feel comfortable.”

Lee says AIG has created microsites, websites customized for individual school districts, with all benefits information in one place. “We continue to improve digital experience, with virtual benefit fairs, animated videos and fun, quick things employees can do on their devices or online to help with financial literacy,” she says. “In addition to digital tools, we make sure we have personnel available as a resource.”

AIG has also developed a nonbranded educational toolkit for plan sponsors. “They can go to our website to find content they can use throughout the year to highlight retirement savings and other financial topics and educate employees,” Lee says.

Heffernon says education and planning should go beyond retirement plans. His firm recently did a Facebook Live panel on student loan forgiveness. The firm has also started working with a group in Florida to help make schools safe—an initiative that was sparked by the Parkland shooting. “We’re focused on providing value beyond retirement programs and planning,” he says.

Lee says one thing that is key to stress to school employees is the importance of setting aside additional savings to supplement defined benefit (DB) plan benefits.

Following the impact of the pandemic, Lee says, employees have been thinking more about saving for unexpected situations—they’re interested in hearing more about emergency savings but also about spending less. “Employers want to help with this, and 403(b) plans can offer additional savings for employees,” she says.

“To help plan sponsors in a hybrid world, we’ve been working closely to increase retirement plan participation and increase employee financial literacy,” says Lee.

SURVEY SAYS: Did Stimulus Payments ‘Stimulate’ the Economy?

NewsDash readers shared whether they saved or spent any stimulus payments they received.

In response to the financial implications for Americans of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government issued three rounds of stimulus payments to certain people aimed at helping those who needed help paying their bills and ‘stimulating’ the economy.

Last week, I asked NewsDash readers, “Did you receive at least one stimulus payment, and how did you use the money?”

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

More than half (57%) of responding readers work in a plan sponsor role, 21% work for recordkeepers/TPAs/investment consultants, 18% are advisers/consultants and 4% are attorneys.

More than six in 10 respondents (61%) said they received at least one stimulus payment.

Among those who received at least one stimulus payment, 47% reported they saved some or all of it, 17% used it to cover bills or essential items for themselves or family member, and 17% splurged on non-essential items. Twelve percent used all or some of the money to pay down credit cards or other debt, 6% gave to a charity or to charities, and 6% made home repairs or improvements.

“Other” uses reported by readers included putting money into children’s college funds, helping people other than family members, and using it for emergency expenses that came up.

Respondents who chose to leave comments mentioned specific items they used the funds for and expressed concern about whether the payments were used as intended and about government spending. No Editor’s Choice this week. A big thank you to all who participated in the survey!

Verbatim

Seemed only fair in the short run, considering the government-mandated closures, and the immediacy of the initial response was critically important. However, by the time the third one came around, money was being sent to folks whose employment hadn’t been impacted, and who thus arguably didn’t need the “free” money from the government (that we’ll be paying for well into the next couple of decades).

Unfortunately, I am not sure they are done with this crazy spending!

I’m not a fan of running up government debt as every bill becomes due eventually, and the only way it’s paid back is by us.

I would have been fine with not receiving one. I think the cutoff threshold was too high.

It wasn’t necessary in our case, but it was nice to know that it was available and that people who needed it were getting it too.

Saved the first two, bought kayaks, home gym equipment, and vacationed with the 3rd. Those are all essential items!

I think the payments only should have been made to those that really needed it; not everyone. I didn’t need the money, and I know a lot of other that didn’t. And I know a lot that did. And unfortunately, some of those that did need the payments chose to use the money on things they didn’t need instead of using it for what they did need. So, I’m not sure the payments served the purpose they were intended.

I was thankful to receive it.

People who did not need the money received it. It would have been a nice vacation fund!

I used the stimulus money to provide transportation to the COVID vaccination site for those who could not afford it.

Both of my kids did receive the payments, and they used the funds to pay down debt or it went into savings. I’m really proud of them for their big picture view of adulting!

I have nothing good to say about stimulus payments.

Stimulus payments made a difference as we’ve been down to one income due to COVID for the past 17 months.

 

NOTE: Responses reflect the opinions of individual readers and not necessarily the stance of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) or its affiliates.

«