With 2003’s asset inflow, ETFs saw total assets under
management swell to $211 billion, data from Morgan Stanley
revealed.
Morgan Stanley attributed much of ETFs success to the
broad-based equity market rally combined with late-trading
and market-timing scandals that rocked mutual funds (See
Keeping Up With the Trading Scandal
), according to a Reuters report.
While the United States remained the number one market
in terms of total assets under management, with $150.7
billion, great strides were made in other markets last
year.
Europe’s total assets invested in ETFs increased 83% to
$19.5 billion, and Japan’s ETF assets rose by nearly a
third to $27.6 billion.
Additionally, trading volumes in ETFs were on the
rise last year.
The average daily volume was up 19% to 170 million
shares globally.
An exchange-traded fund is an investment company
with shares that trade intraday on stock exchanges at
market-determined prices. Investors may buy or sell ETF
shares through a broker just as they would the shares of
any publicly traded company (See
Black Box: Exchange-Traded Funds
).
April 25, 2002 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - There's a lot of
'buzz' about the newly enhanced 529 college savings plans -
and a growing interest on the part of plan sponsors in
considering the programs.
A couple of weeks ago, a reader noted,
‘I must receive at least 10 plugs a week for the 529
Plans. But to tell you the truth, I’m scared to death to
add another administrative burden to our current benefit
layout. The brokers profess that there is no administrative
burden, unfortunately I am like an elephant and I also
remember when they said the same thing about
401(k)’s.’
Those representations aside, this week we asked readers
‘Do you have – or are you considering adding – a Section
529 college savings program as part of your benefits
mix?’
Nearly
64%
of our reader respondents already have in place – or are
actively considering implementing a 529 college savings
program. Even so, the other
36%
seemed to have already given active consideration to the
topic before discarding the notion.
‘We are considering 529’s because
we consider everything, especially
those programs which brokers and
financial consultants bombard senior
management with propaganda about…’
The good news for those who are still considering them
-plan sponsors that have embraced the notion seem to be
quite happy with the lack of implementation pain – even
though the programs may not yet have really caught on with
workers. One reader’s comment was typical,
‘The enrollments have not been high, but steadily
increase each payday. There has been little
administrative burden and no cost to us. I’m pleased
that we can offer our faculty and staff this new benefit
and didn’t have to request budget money to run the program
or pay any costs.’
Those who have opted not to support these programs
frequently cite a lack of familiarity with the issues
involved with implementing a 529 plan, concerns about the
fees imbedded in the programs or a general sense that this
alternative is available to workers outside of workplace
participation. One reader offered this illustrative
perspective
‘The people pitching 529 plans don’t want to talk about
fees or net investment returns – they want to talk about
ease of enrollment. Last time I checked, it’s
the investment returns that will determine whether your
children will be able to go to the college of their
choice.’
Another noted,
‘…this benefit is easily accessible to individuals, we
are not interested in taking on the additional
administration and certain states offer extra tax benefits
for the 529 plans affiliated with their state. Next
month we have a 529 fair planned at our largest
office. 5 vendors have been invited so that our
employees can talk to each. Short general educational
sessions will be presented…’
And then of course – there’s this week’s
EDITOR’S CHOICE
:
‘We are considering 529’s because we consider
everything, especially those programs which brokers and
financial consultants bombard senior management with
propaganda about…’
All in all, there clearly seems to be a lot of 529
selling going on – and a respectable amount of buying.
But why take our word for it – come check out the rest
of the
VERBATIMS
. While as always we wanted to respect the
confidentiality of our respondents, we have included
provider names and comments this week. The vast
majority are positive – and it may offer those of you who
are contemplating offering the programs a good place to
start. You may also want to check out our WEB WATCH
from the March issue of
PLANSPONSOR
–
Surfing Section
529
.
Thanks to everyone who participated in our
survey!
The question was: Do you have - or are you
considering adding - a Section 529 college savings
program as part of your benefits mix?
THE VERBATIMS
We do not have nor will we be adding a sec 529 plan
We began our Section 529 Plan on January 1, 2002. We
chose TIAA-CREF as the vendor, as that is the vendor of
choice for the state of Minnesota. The enrollments have
not been high, but steadily increase each payday. There
has been little administrative burden and no cost to
us. I'm pleased that we can offer our faculty and staff
this new benefit and didn't have to request budget money to
run the program or pay any costs.
We do not have a 529 plan but are considering it. I
wish that these were as clean as 401(k) products in that you
could do your due diligence, select one, and then monitor
performance.
These plans are different in that better investment options
vary by the age of participant's children, and tax benefits
vary by the state people live in. The vendors were also
picked by government officials who had a bias towards
companies in their own states. Thus people will have to
compare state tax benefits to expected investment returns.
We will likely invite a couple vendors in to pitch their
products and educate our staff. We will also provide
some tools on finding other 529 vendors to our staff.
It is unlikely we will recommend any of them. We
currently allow our staff to direct their paycheck to be
deposited in to up to 3 accounts such as checking and/or
savings. They may use this option to direct deposits
from their pay to a 529 account.
Good subject!
No, we don't plan to offer, but we do encourage employees
to set these up on the their own through bank drafts,
etc. As a Fidelity client, our employees get a
host of personal services available to them with little of no
fees attached as long as they have a 401(k) account.
529 College Savings Plan are a part of this.
My company is not considering a 529 plan this year since
employees can enroll as individuals and do not require a
group contract to take advantage of a 529 program. Like
so many other employee voluntary plans, the vendors' promote
the ease of administration and discount the difficulty of
multiple payroll feeds, payroll corrections, IT resources,
leaves of absences and other employee and employer
administrative issues that make a employee voluntary plan
burdensome.
Our Company is not considering adding a 529 plan to our
menu of benefits.
No way! At this time, I have no intentions of
adding a 529 plan to my benefit offering. I to am an
elephant. Although I was a toddler when the 401(k) was
invented. So I don't remember any of the promises made
at that time. Seriously, although I may not offer it, I
have no hesitation to inform my employees of this plan.
Actually I recently wrote an article in our newsletter
explaining what a 529 plan is. Did it help?
I don't know, but at least I've provided an alternative
outside of our plan for our employees to investigate.
Our plan allows loans for education and if I can work on my
employees now and get them out of the thought pattern that "I
can borrow against my retirement to pay for Billy and Janie's
college" then I have succeeded. I think?!
After much research, we did offer a 529 on January 1,
2002. Because we have employees in 47 states, we tried
to just look for the "best" plan, and didn't include any
state-tax incentives in our comparisons. We also tried
to ignore the brokers' hard sell of Rhode Island's plan, as
they (the brokers) get generously compensated for selling
this one. Getting info besides what is available on the
website was rather like pulling teeth for those states that
hadn't yet put plans with brokers, and weren't really set up
to sell outside their state.
But we persevered! Because we have both high-paid
execs who were interested in the plans from an estate
planning perspective as well as many minimum-wage employees
who couldn't afford some state's monthly minimums for payroll
deduction, this research was quite time consuming. The
things we listed as most important: High maximum, low
minimum, low fees, investments available must include all
three of full equity, date of birth-type, and a fixed option
with a "guaranteed" return, as well as a web-site, people
available to do employee meetings and good customer
service. We ended up offering TIAA-Cref's CHET plan
(Connecticut).
My company is considering looking into adding a 529
plan. With the market's performance so poor - employees
are not clamoring for it. I've done a decent amount of
research on the plans, and have come up with the following
conclusions:
1) 529 plans are sold, not bought. One only has to
look at the Tower Automotive situation to know this.
That a company wouldn't seem to consider the tax advantages
of the plan in the state where most of their workers are
located is unbelievable.
2) The people pitching 529 plans don't want to talk about
fees or net investment returns - they want to talk about ease
of enrollment. Last time I checked, it's the
investment returns that will determine whether your children
will be able to go to the college of their choice.
I have been looking into 529 plans for my own children and
haven't been able to find a plan that I am comfortable with -
how can I make a similar recommendation for my company's
employees?
We are planning to add a 529 plan to our offerings this
summer. We haven't made a decision as to which one
yet. This may not be a true employee benefit, since all
of the 529 plans can be entered on your own, but I believe
the opportunity is too great not to get this information (and
the opportunity for payroll deduction) in front of our
employees.
529 Plans ... we are considering.
Yes, we are considering adding a 529 plan. But, I do
not view it as a benefit.
Yes, we are considering adding a 529 plan this year.
We just installed a 529 plan at the beginning of this
month. Although the response has been "underwhelming", I can
say that I remain very enthusiastic about the plan itself,
both personally and professionally. My VP of HR and I spent
several hours reviewing the plans together ourselves and with
a financial advisor who pitched the concept to us -- we went
through every detail of how the plans work in general and
then a couple of specific plans to determine what would be
our best option.
While nothing carries NO administrative burden, I can tell
you that the burden of implementing one of these plans is
minimal. I do recommend working with a broker; mine is
handling all the paperwork and the vast majority of the
communication -- I make sure he has access to the employees
and vice versa and he does the rest. All questions,
enrollments, everything goes through him. All I do is set up
the payroll deductions, since we do payroll in-house, and cut
a check once a month to send to the investment company.
Honestly, if an employer wants to stay on the edge of
what's being offered, this is a very simple way to do it.
Plus you may be able to get the investment house to waive
their loads if you do it through payroll deduction, which
they won't do for your employee if s/he walks in off the
street to open the account. In a nutshell, we couldn't find a
reason NOT to offer the plan.
As you can tell, I couldn't resist the opportunity to
weigh in on this! I was the first to enroll in our plan, and
when my daughter graduates high school in 2013 I'll be ready!
In response to your question regarding 529 plans - we are not
planning to offer this as a corporate benefit. We are a
company operating in 5 states. We have decided it is
better to educate our employees about 529 plans and let them
know they can use direct deposit to send money to the account
they set up.
We have taken this stand for a number of reasons; this
benefit is easily accessible to individuals, we are not
interested in taking on the additional administration and
certain states offer extra tax benefits for the 529 plans
affiliated with their state. Next month we have a 529
fair planned at our largest office. 5 vendors have been
invited so that our employees can talk to each. Short
general educational sessions will be presented.
529 Plans are everywhere. This is an incredibly complex
decision because of the wide variety of offerings and the
vast differences in how the individual states handle their
own residents. I share the concern about the so-called "easy"
administration and the burden that we may place on our
administrative systems. We are not yet close to a decision as
we need to think about the most advantageous treatment for
employees in 47 states.
We are considering 529's because we consider everything,
especially those programs which brokers and financial
consultants bombard senior management with propaganda
about...However, in our case, we have low participation in
our 401(k) plan at the lower levels of compensation and the
only real advantage of the employer establishing a 529 is, of
course, payroll deduction. Higher paid employees should
not need payroll deduction to establish their own 529
plans. So there is no real reason for the employer to
establish one, if the employees who would benefit most from
payroll deduction do not now participate in the 401(k)
plan.
Obviously, I am not one who subscribes to the theory that we
offer as many "cost-free" benefits as possible to our
employees, just so we can show what a great array of benefits
we provide (at minimum expense to the employer) and get on
some trade magazine's "Top Ten" employer list.
As I tell the senior execs, if you are being inundated with
calls from brokers/consultants/insurance agents to establish
these programs, (as we were with LTC insurance a few years
back) who do you think is going to benefit most from the
programs?
Also, all I need is one more number or acronym to totally
confuse employees...401(k), 403(b), 457, 404(c), 11-K,
1099-R, 125, CODA, IRA, SEP, HMO, PPO, POS, IPA, FSA, IRS,
DOL, ERISA, COBRA, HIPAA and now 529. And we wonder why
they don't appreciate the benefit programs we already offer.
Sorry about venting, I am a little stressed today. I
guess I should call my EAP.
Depends on the provider of the service for the work that a
plan sponsor would need to be provided in. Several
providers are willing to do the mailing to participants and
will suggested direct deposit for a monthly contribution to
the 529. This is just like splitting a pay check
between two checking accounts, so should not be hard for an
organization if they already have that ability.
I go over all the state plans where my clients are located
and compare them to the two that Fidelity offers. If
they have a large presence in NY, MO, or CA I will tell them
to look elsewhere. The state benefit of their plan is
far better.
The hardest thing to get through a plan sponsors head is that
this is not one large plan, but more like IRA's. Once
they understand that they make their decision to move forward
quickly!
I added a 529 plan several months ago. Although it did
require a fair amount of time researching the plan and then
setting-up educational meetings, I spend little, if any, time
on the plan now that it's instituted. The brokers took
and take all the burden of answering questions and giving
assistance to my employees.
We are considering adding a Section 529 college savings plan.
Yes, we are considering adding Section 529 Plans, but only
through direct deposit. We have employees in multiple
states, so it is important to determine whether it is best to
go with a national firm or through each state. So far,
we think using each state's plan would be the best. No
decisions have been made yet.
We have just "sponsored" a 529 program in Virginia. The
contributions happen directly from the participant's personal
bank account and there is no paperwork that passes through
our department. A new employee is handed the package at
their orientation and either applies or not - it's up to
them. They mail the application directly to the broker.
The employees could get the same plan by going to a
broker. By "sponsoring" the plan, the administrative
fees charged by the funds in the plan are approx. 50 basis
points lower.
No discrimination testing, no paperwork, no payroll
withholding and transfer. Employees get discounted
access, set up their own payment plan, get professional
advice, some get state tax deduction and they save for
college tax free (or deferred, depending on the sunset
clause). Why not?
529 is something we will implement very shortly and some
recent products - such as the one offered through American
Funds (College America) requires ZERO (0) administrative
work.
Regarding 529
Like many types of insurance, this is a benefit that is
currently more sold than bought. The broker blitzkrieg
on these plans may be having some affect despite some strong
reservations on my part. A couple of points to keep in
mind.
1) 529 plans don't require employer involvement.
Employees can (and I have) signed up for 529 plans without
any need for an employer to make the contribution. The
IRS Code Section reference makes people think of them like
401(k) plans. 401(k) plans require an employer to make
the contribution. 529 plans do not. The brokers like to
say that if the employer takes care of it through payroll
deduction, they will waive the load. But there are also
no-load 529 plans. In this respect, they are more like
IRAs.
2) Multi-state employers need to consider the potential
state tax implications. There was a good article on
this in the April 5 Wall Street Journal. If you pick,
say, the Michigan 529 plan for your employees, your Michigan
employees can get a nice state tax deduction, but it won't do
a thing for your California or North Dakota employees.
(Federal tax exemption would continue to apply.) The
only way to make everyone happy is to permit a 529 plan
deduction for every state you operate in or, better yet, let
employees make their own choices and stay out of it.
We spent time looking into it, but in the end opted not to do
it. We found that at least some of the money management
firms offered it retail for the same cost as if we as a
corporation sponsored it. So why take on additional
exposure when we are adding no value? The individual is
free to sign up at no cost if they go with a systematic
investment election, which is the best way to do it anyway.
We are not considering adding a 529 plan benefit.
We are considering offering a 529, but like the reader you
quoted I am concerned about the administrative demands. My
staff is, like most HR departments, already "maxxed out"
Regarding 529 plans -
We are having our TPA handle everything, we are not even
offering payroll deductions. This benefit will be
enrolled through the company but from there our TPA will send
out bills based on the frequency the employee requests at
sign-up and employees will use a website and phone contact
for investment options and account changes.
This set-up will also allow employees to take this benefit
with them if they leave our company (we are a staffing
company so we have high turnover) without having to go
through a sign-up process similar to COBRA or Life.
We examined offering a 529 plan earlier this year. Our
conclusion...realistically, for the average parent trying to
put money away for his children's
We are planning to add a Section 529 plan by the end of
summer. I have serious concerns that the marketing
blitz around 529s may lead the uninformed consumer to make a
choice that is not optimal. With the sunset provisions
on 529s, many people could have tax problems if tax favored
treatment is not extended. Additionally, consumers
should also look at other savings vehicles such as a
Coverdell IRA.
Service providers missed the boat on 529s by not being out
front with the offering of payroll deduction. Most
employees find payroll deduction to be an easy way to
save. We have arm twisted our provider into offering
true payroll deductions, not the checking account debit
option. We're hoping this will encourage people to look
at 529s.
Our communications campaign will provide lots of
information about 529s, alternatives and the differences with
certain state sponsored 529 plans. I suspect some
people have not already gotten into tax favored plans because
of the tremendous amount of confusion and lack of clear
information.
I have considered adding a 529 plan to the benefits offered
for our 2100 employees, but decided against it for the time
being because of the limited tenure for the benefit. An
employee could save for a young child's education and find
that the tax benefit is gone by the time the child reaches
college age.
We are looking at a 529 offering, but like the quote in the
newsletter, we are concerned about the administrative
headache.
We have been getting a lot of solicitations also, and my
senior management wants me to take a look at it.
Frankly, I'm not seeing the "value added" from an employee
benefits perspective. It's nothing more than the old
payroll deduction for savings bonds the way I see it.
It's not pre-tax, so taking it from a paycheck isn't of
benefit. I've not seen any "group" pricing, so the
power of large groups isn't helping. I think it's a
very important savings vehicle that anyone with children
should pursue (I've had one of my own for my children for
several years...even before the recent tax
enhancements). But why do it by payroll
deduction?
The other concern I've seen, but haven't researched, is
that since these are state sponsored programs, there may be
some tax implications if you offer a single program company
wide for employees not in the state sponsoring the
program.
Since we're a financial services organization, our sales
folks are out there selling these things like crazy to our
customers, though. So I'll keep looking
We are not considering a 529 with no plans to add one.
I would like to see a possible offering of the plan via
work, however, without a pre-tax benefit for employers, I
don't see the benefit to sell as a cost-saving benefit as
well.
However, I can see it being a good possibility to encourage
employees to save in addition to their retirement, but, also,
see those with families struggling with the constant health
insurance cost increases, as is, so would need to know if it
would take off.
We added the NYSAVES and NJBEST plans via payroll deduction
effective 1/1/2002. Some admin burden for sure, but not
a major issue. Scads of sales calls, and now I just say
we already implemented, and they thank me and hang up.
We selected these two because 99% of our 23,000 employees
live in NY and NJ, and they both have very low admin fees
and/or commissions.
Enrollment is low, but growing.
We are considering a 529 plan, but are also concerned about
the administrative burden. I also get 5 calls a day on
offerings..... I refer them to my broker and then they
pretty much leave me alone (that is, sometimes)
We anticipate offering this benefit by Oct '02
For a small company, we offer a competitive benefit
package. I, constantly, try to communicate its scope to
the employees. Then my boss comes in and asks, "do we
have a vision plan?"
Why would I throw a 529 into the soup?
I'm definitely interested in adding a 529 Plan and I agree
with your previously quote - there is as "little" to do as
there is to administering a 401(k). With that aside, I
do have a lot of questions as to the issues with these plans
and would like to hear from those who have already set up a
plan.
We have a 529 program. It's been in for about 8 months. The
admin burden consists of distributing intro material, telling
those with questions to call the broker, and collecting
forms. We went with Alliance because it was the only one with
payroll deductions. Became real concerned when it looked like
Alliance wasn't making the most well thought out investments
(read Enron).
From a fiduciary point of view thought we should revisit
using them. The rest of the committee didn't feel as strongly
about it so we've kept them. We encourage those considering
Alliance to check out the
www.savingforcollege.com
web site to get general info on 529s and about other
alternatives.
We have made summary info available to all employees, but we
have not yet offered payroll deductions. We have not
recommended any one plan, because there are so many different
variations, and they all seem to be changing structure and
options regularly.
We added a Section 529 plan last fall (2001) and it's a big
hit! And, even better, there's basically no internal
administration for our Benefits staff. It runs very smoothly!
We use the plan from Rhode Island, through Alliance
Capital. I would definitely recommend it to other employers.
Good Morning from Illinois,
We recently made application for the College Bound fund
through Alliance Capital. This fund permits
distributions to any accredited institution of higher
education versus our state plan that is restricted to
Illinois colleges. There are several employees
enrolling however on a personal level, I am not sure that
this is the way to invest. We must remember that the
laws governing this program are not indefinite and the
question is, "then what?" Since it is an after-tax
program, why not just open a mutual fund account?
Our company is on the small side and none of our employees
have requested this benefit. Our management is very
employee driven as far as benefits go. They don't usually
review the benefits or compare them to the competitive
market. The approach is more reactionary and look into
something when too many good employees are lost because
something isn't offered. For example our 401(k) didn't
start until July 1997.
My wife and I have started a 529 for our niece and nephew
so I think I have a pretty good understanding as to the
mechanics of the program. However as a benefit what are
we talking about? The employer managing the plan and
paying the administration fees while the employee funds the
account or do some companies even fund the accounts? If
so how is it handled if some employees don't want a 529
because they and everyone in their family is smart enough?
We are planning/hoping to add a 529 option to our benefits
this year, but have not selected a vendor yet.
I have noted at least one broker who tried to sell their
product as "no cost". What he wasn't saying is that,
while there is not a direct charge to the employer, there are
management and/or annual fees charged to the
participant. As with 401(k)s, employers will probably
have to do some digging to assure fees are reasonable (and
then make sure the participants are informed).
We are actively considering offering it as an employee
benefit, however I also have concern over the administration
as my team is very small and supports a large population with
less.
Two questions:
I have heard that if a child has these accounts set up for
them that should they want to apply for federal aids or
scholarships that they will now not be eligible for those
programs. Is that true?
I have also heard that you can set this up for a child and
should that child decide not to go to college, you can
transfer these funds to a new child: HOWEVER and here's the
catch that I have heard, that child must also be a part of
that immediate family. For example: I have two
children, I set the account up for one, they decide to not
attend college, I can transfer that fund over to the second
child. Ex: I have one child, I establish a 529 Plan,
and they decide they do not want to go to college, now I
can't transfer that fund over to a niece or nephew, as they
are not immediate in the family the plan was
established. I would find that the second is example
was true, but can someone clarify?
We currently have a 529 plan that we implemented last year.
My only concern is I hope that California gets on the
bandwagon and makes qualified withdrawals tax free!
We are just starting to evaluate. Information is somewhat
hard to come by, and the objectives of different areas of the
company (Finance and Benefits) are not always in tandem
(what's new?). Hope to know more in a few months.
In reviewing 529 plans, it appears that much is dependent on
state laws and their deduction status. Many states,
like Maryland, have their own broker and you must use their
plan for the state deduction. Unless a broker offers a
serious discount for an employer benefit plan, there appears
to be little incentive to offer a 529 plan through an
employer, especially multi-state employers. Certainly,
anyone could do a payroll deduction into an individual's plan
and certainly employee education is always a good thing, but
as an employer-provided benefit, I don't see any great
upside. A 529 plan can be an excellent personal savings and
investment program, but there appears to be little advantage
"offering" it though the employer.
We are considering adding a Section 529 plan but are just in
the information gathering stage. Areas of concern -
company liability, administrative burden, cost of
education/implementation.
Considering adding but concerned over:
Administrative overhead
The fact that certain state plans may be more advantageous to
employees than a generic 529. What is our "obligation"
to explain this in the 40+ states in which we have employees?
Are other companies promoting Upromise in conjunction with
their 529?
http://www.upromise.com/
Will enough employees consider this a valuable addition to
our benefits package to make it worth our while?
We do plan to add a 529 plan. Since we have employees
in over 40 states, we will need to develop communication
materials explaining the various state tax provisions.
Yes, my organization is looking to introduce a
payroll-deduction 529 plan this year (offered through
Fidelity, also our 401(k) plan provider).
We are doing implementation due diligence as I write this
to ensure that the program can be delivered to our employees
as efficiently as possible (we - HR & Finance/Payroll do
NOT want, and won't, take on an excessive administrative
burden). Otherwise, this seems like a no-brainer (high
value, high visibility, no "hard dollar" cost, completely
voluntary to the employee - if you want the investment
options of a different state plan "have at it", etc.).
The offering is also consistent with the benefits component
of our broader "people strategy" (to provide competitive
rewards programs), and this offering seems to be - or will
become - a competitive practice.
Big picture, I don't see the downside.
My company does not sponsor or endorse any 529 plans, nor
does it provide a listing of 529 plans. The company will,
however, enable employees to direct part of their paycheck to
a 529 plan, just as they can direct deposit to a bank.
Employees are given the name of a popular website that does
reviews of each state's plan.
This is a major "land grab" opportunity for the
brokers....once the money is in the plan, it stays for
umpteen years....a nice cash flow due to very high fees, with
little or no risk of its leaving. The hook, of course,
is the extremely beneficial tax treatment to
investors...until 2010 anyway, then who knows what will
happen!
I'm glad you are surveying about 529's. I am
entertaining the idea of adding a 529 option as an offering
to our employees, but right now I am inclined to drop the
idea. My main concern is this scenario:
In an effort to help our employees save for college
expenses, if we offer a 529, then some years down the road
the investment returns of the 529 plan we chose to offer may
turn out to be less attractive than some others on the
market, so our employees are unhappy, thinking they could
have done better selecting a 529 plan on their own. Why
stick the company's chin out there when we really don't have
to? With some other employee-pay-all offerings
(optional life insurance, long-term care insurance, etc.)
there is a benefit to the employee through group rating,
guaranteed-issue underwriting, or whatever.
While offering a 529 helps the employee by allowing "easy"
payroll deductions, there really is no other meaningful
benefit provided. One could argue that the company
helps by doing the comparison shopping for the employee, but
then that brings me to my main concern - - - it would place
the employer in a quasi-fiduciary role... and I don't need
any more fiduciary liabilities.
When employees have asked me about 529's, I have referred
them to the internet (I have even printed out some internet
information for those less PC-literate) and suggested they
talk to their banker or broker. I think that's as far
as I want to go right now.
We don't have a 529 plan yet. Some of our executives
are asking for it, so we soon will offer or endorse one!
I am in the process of analyzing the offerings.
Frankly, I don't need another employee payroll deduction to
complicate my life even more. I'm leaning toward a plan
that has automatic deduction from a checking/savings account
(handled by the company reaping the benefit of those dollars)
instead of a plan that uses me, the automatic benefits
administrator, who only reaps the benefit of extra
work. Seems like a no brainer to me, but we'll see if
anyone else values my time!
The difficult part is comparing all the possible fees they
can charge: program fees, administration fees, account fees
and sales charges. I think they (the companies offering
529 plans) are trying to blow smoke, so we get frustrated and
don't dig too deeply and find out that they have invented
another plan to transfer money from our pockets to theirs.
Yes, we are seriously considering offering our employees the
opportunity for payroll deduction of the Wisconsin Plan, the
state were our employees work. We have ~3,000
employees. Other than that we are not endorsing any
specific plan. The question we have is how are other
employers sorting through the confusion of information that
we all receive on the Plans.
Thanks and I enjoy the daily information.
We are currently evaluating 529 plans, although it looks like
our recommendation will be to not add a 529 plan to our mix
of benefits at this time. We are going to add
information on 529 plans to our Benefits Intranet and a link
to
www.savingforcollege.com
The main reason we are not going to offer a 529 plan is
that we are uncomfortable picking just one 529 plan and
administrator to work with. We have employees in 41
states, so we cannot offer a 529 plan for each
state--administratively impossible. And there are tax
advantages to those employees in the state where the 529 plan
is administered, but maybe not to employees in other
states. Also, there is some concern about the liability
of offering a particular 529 plan and then that plan doesn't
do well compared to a plan that the employee could have
utilized within their home state that perhaps performed
better.
And, last by not least, 529 plans are just too new.
We'd like to see "how it goes" before jumping in head first
and adding it to our benefit package.
We won't be offering a 529 plan either. Our position is
that anyone that wants one - and it will likely be the
highly-paids - is already being inundated with solicitations
and so doesn't need our help.
Regarding 529 plans - We implemented
Fidelity's Employee Investment Services (EIS), which includes
a 529 plan at the beginning of this month. Employers
may choose to implement a 529 plan without the entire
package. Fidelity completed the entire mailing of information
to our employees' homes. Employees may call to enroll or
enroll through NetBenefits, the Fidelity website open to our
employees as a result of their administration of our 401k
plan.
Fidelity is also providing a road show for our plant
locations free of charge. They will review basic
investment principles while focusing in the EIS benefit,
particularly the 529 plan. We received our first
"direct deposit" enrollment form in our Shared Services
Center this week. It took all of 2 minutes to update in
our HR/Payroll system. Employees may choose to
participate through direct deposit from our payroll,
electronic debit from checking or savings accounts, or pay by
personal check.
We also explained to employees that other plans are available
and recommended they check out Savingforcollege.com or see a
financial advisor for more information. Our employees
are able to see their company sponsored 401k plan account
information and the new EIS account information in one place
on the internet and all the information is aggregated for
financial planning through Portfolio Planner in
NetBenefits.
Fidelity expects approximately 11% enrollment, not all of
who will request direct deposit from payroll. All calls
into our Shared Services Center regarding this benefit are
directed immediately to Fidelity. We really do very
little to administer this plan, and since it is not an ERISA
plan there are no dreaded filings to complete or spds to
create.
Ask me in another year how things are going and I hope to
be able to continue to wax as eloquently about Fidelity's
product as I can now!
Yes, we are adding a 529 plan through our Fidelity 401 (k)
plan. It isn't a big administrative burden, but does require
payroll to take some additional money out of an employee's
check.
We are not considering the Section 529 college savings
program. We don't want any competition for the 401(k)
plan. It is always a struggle to increase the deferral
levels, so that our highly-compensated employees can
contribute more and still have the plan pass the
nondiscrimination tests.
We have provided employees information about 529's thru our
401k recordkeeper, Fidelity. The employee can set up a
direct deposit to a Fidelity account. There are no
administrative issues since it is a direct deposit election
only.
It looks like we will be adding a 529 to our mix. We,
too, have been told it's a no-brainer because there is
supposedly no administrative burden. But because I will
be stuck with it, I am very skeptical.
I have to agree with the person who said he didn't need any
additional administrative burdens. Although a 529
option would be wonderful for people who wish to save for
their kids' college education, I just don't believe the
benefit is that easy to administer. Given the amount of
problems I have with our 401k plan, as we Texans say:
"That dog won't hunt."
We do not offer a 529 plan. We looked at this and
decided the administrative aspects as well as setting up a
deduction for this would cost the company money for something
that the employees could do on their own as a deduction from
a bank account.
My company already has a 529 plan and the reason it is not
administratively burdensome is that it seems that only 5
people know about it (out of 2,000). Sarcasm aside, our plan
is through TIAA-CREF, it is called the Scholarshare plan and
does seem to be light on the admin. Employees fill out a form
or go on-line to enroll, submit a check for the initial
deposit or do a direct debit, then send the payroll deduction
form to payroll. I never get involved. Statements are sent
directly to participants and they may only change their
investment style once a year. There is no recordkeeping such
as audits, 5500's, discrim testing etc.