Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.
The Thrust of Fiduciary Liability Insurance
As defined contribution (DC) plans become the main drivers of America’s retirement savings, a plan sponsor’s role as fiduciary is becoming highly scrutinized. Fiduciaries to a plan are legally liable to act in the best interests of plan participants and the Department of Labor (DOL)’s Conflict of Interest Rule is only expanding that role.
In recent years, the DC plan space has seen a wave of litigation surrounding the management of retirement plans. One common denominator in these cases is the argument over alleged excessive fees.
According to Groom Law Group, these cases raise “allegations against fiduciaries for breaching their obligations to the plan and its participants by charging or permitting excessive fees and expenses for plan services provided by third parties, such as investment management, recordkeeping, and asset custody.” Another common practice being challenged is the use of proprietary funds. Often times, fiduciaries are accused of offering investments from a financial institution sponsoring the plan or its affiliates for the sole purpose of benefiting the institution.
In either case, Groom Law Group suggests that the right kind of fiduciary liability insurance can mitigate the costs of fighting these claims. The firm warns that “Over the last 10 years, the scope of so-called 401(k) ‘excessive fee’ litigation — another staple of the plaintiffs’ bar — has expanded to the point where every plan sponsor and plan service provider dealing with a 401(k) plan of significant size should be on notice that it may be the next defendant in this type of ERISA class action.”
Of course, all fiduciary liability insurance policies define their unique terms, conditions and limitations. But most have a few key factors in common. For example, coverage kicks in when the insured is facing an actual claim for a wrongful act allegedly committed by the insured. Groom Law says “Generally, a claim may be a written demand for monetary damages or injunctive relief, a civil complaint, a formal administrative or regulatory proceeding commenced by the filing of a notice of charges or formal investigative order, or a written notice by DOL or the PBGC of an investigation against an insured for a wrongful act.”
However, this insurance can’t be used to restore losses to an employee benefit plan “when a plan sponsor or employer discovers that it made an error.” Fiduciary liability insurance can only defend against a claim and then “pay for any covered award entered against the insured up to the policy’s limit of liability.”
The firm adds that policy provisions “may be used to preclude coverage for indemnity payments that constitute benefits that are payable to participants or their beneficiaries under the terms of a plan, or that would have been payable under the terms of the plan had it complied with ERISA.”
But regardless of what protection a policy may offer, it is important to pay attention to who exactly is protected or defined as the insured. Groom Law points out that third-party providers such as investment advisers and investment managers are generally not protected by a plan sponsor’s fiduciary liability insurance. Even when relief sought is not a monetary loss, however, the insureds may still have coverage for defense costs.
Some policies have a duty-to-defend provision which allow insureds to select their own defense counsel. Groom Law notes that “due to the volume of the claims they handle, fiduciary liability insurance carriers commonly negotiate lower rates with the defense firms. The firm adds that “Fiduciary liability carriers also typically have litigation management guidelines in place that help to ensure that the costs of defense are reasonable and necessary. These defense provisions are important because fiduciary liability policies typically pay for defense costs within the limits of liability, meaning that every dollar spent by the carrier on defense costs erodes the available limit of liability by that same amount. These types of policies are commonly referred to as eroding limits policies.”
Groom Law Group’s report “Who May Sue You and Why: How to Reduce Your ERISA Risks, and the Role of Fiduciary Liability Insurance” can be found at Groom.com.
You Might Also Like:
Trump’s ‘Unusual’ Pick for Secretary of Labor Has More Health Than Retirement Track Record
EBSA Criticized for Sharing Retirement Plan Information With Plaintiff Law Firm
DOL Launches Data Collection Effort For ‘Lost & Found’ Retirement Initiative
« Meant to Aid Struggling Multiemployer Plans, MPRA Adds Complications