FASB Proposes Pension Accounting Changes

FASB says its objective is to improve the effectiveness of disclosures.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has proposed changes to reporting requirements for defined benefit (DB) plans and other post-retirement benefits.

In a new publication, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost,” FASB explains that under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), defined benefit pension cost and post-retirement benefit cost (net benefit cost) comprise several components that reflect different aspects of an employer’s financial arrangements as well as the cost of benefits provided to employees. Those components are aggregated for reporting in the financial statements.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

According to FASB, many stakeholders have observed that the presentation of defined benefit cost on a net basis combines elements that are distinctly different in their predictive value. As such, these stakeholders have stated that the current presentation requirement has less value and requires users to incur greater costs in analyzing financial statements. The reduced transparency in the presentation of net benefit cost also reduces the usefulness of financial information.

The amendments in the proposed update would require an employer to report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost would be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described.

Text of the proposal is here. Comments are due by April 26.

NEXT: Other disclosure requirement changes

In another publication, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20): Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans,” FASB says its objective and primary focus are to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by facilitating clear communication of the information required by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that is most important to users of each entity’s financial statements.

The following disclosure requirements would be added to Subtopic 715-20:

  • A description of the nature of the benefits provided, the employee groups covered, and the type of benefit plan formula;
  • The weighted-average interest crediting rate for cash balance plans and other plans with a promised interest crediting rate;
  • Quantitative and qualitative disclosures from Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, about assets measured at net asset value using a practical expedient;
  • A narrative description of the reasons for significant gains and losses affecting the benefit obligation or plan assets; and
  • For nonpublic entities, the effects of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates (this disclosure is currently required only for public entities).

The proposal also includes disclosure requirements that would be removed from Subtopic 715-20. The amendments in the proposed update would specify that disclosures about defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans should be disaggregated between domestic and foreign plans.

Text of the proposal is here. Comments are due by April 26.

More Than Withdrawal Strategy Needed for Retirement Income

Ongoing withdrawals from savings could jeopardize people’s future, LIMRA says.

Fifty-six percent of Americans do not have a retirement income strategy, and among those that do, the most sophisticated plan is simply withdrawing money from savings accounts, a tactic that LIMRA does not recommend.

Among the 44% who do have a plan, 60% plan to withdraw from their savings only occasionally or when needed, and 32% intend to make regular withdrawals from their savings, according to LIMRA research. This could increase their risk and reduce the number of years their money will last, LIMRA says. Only 20% plan to convert their savings to guaranteed income.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Earlier research from the LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute found that people might withdraw too much each year. Even if they apply the widely recommended 4% withdrawal every year, their portfolio is still subject to market swings. As LIMRA puts it: “History has shown us that a truly safe maximum withdrawal rate is an elusive figure.”

People are also living longer. LIMRA has found that there is a 50% chance that at least one member of a 65-year-old couple will live beyond age 88, and a 25% chance one of them will reach age 97. “The couple in this example would need an income source that lasts 30 years or longer,” LIMRA says. “If they pursue only a withdrawal strategy, they risk not having enough financial resources for the last years of their lives.”

In addition to volatility and longevity risks, the Defined Contribution Institutional Investment Association points to inflation and consumption risks. Then there is the issue of rising health care costs for retirees.

While retirement plan sponsors are beginning to consider offering guaranteed retirement income options, the majority are waiting for safe harbor regulations from the Department of Labor.

«