Financial Wellness Decreases After Years of Improvement

Stress over money is contributing to distractions in the workplace, as well as health issues.

Employee financial wellness is on a decline after several years of improvement in many areas, according to PwC’s 2016 Employee Financial Wellness Survey.

Recent market volatility, continued wage stagnation and an election year are just a few of the factors that may be contributing to less-certain feelings about money. According to PwC’s survey, employees’ top financial concern is not having enough emergency savings for unexpected expenses, which rose 4% this year from 51% in 2015 to 55%.

“They just don’t have enough savings liquidity to withstand another downturn,” Kent Allison, partner and national practice leader at PwC, tells PLANSPONSOR.

Other concerns include not being able to retire at the desired age (37%), not being able to meet monthly expenses (25%), being laid off from work (20%) and not being able to keep up with debt (15%).

Millennials are slightly more worried about not having enough emergency savings (60%), compared with Gen X (56%) and Baby Boomers (50%). However, Millennials are the least concerned about being able to retire when they want to (25%), compared with 37% of Gen X and 45% of Baby Boomers. When asked if they think the next generation will be better or worse off financially than their own generation, 56% of all respondents predicted worse off, 21% predicted the same and 23% guessed they would be better off.

NEXT: Student loans, credit card debtOverall, PwC found that Millennials are in worse financial shape than older generations. They’re more likely to be stressed about their finances and distracted by their finances while at work. One big reason is student loan debt. Forty-two percent of Millennial employees have student loans, and 79% say these loans have a moderate or a significant impact on their ability to meet their other financial goals.

“You really have to have benefit plans that help people address [student loan debt],” Allison says. “So I would not be surprised if we see more focus on this student debt. It’s going to be a continued problem, and it’s causing additional stress, which impacts health, productivity.”

Allison adds that until financial issues including student loan debt are addressed, employees will have trouble focusing on long-term goals, including retirement.

According to this year’s survey, Millennials find it increasingly difficult to meet their household expenses (46% in 2016, compared with 35% in 2015). In addition, more Baby Boomers report carrying credit card balances this year (46%) than last year (37%). The survey doesn’t necessarily give an indication as to why credit card debt has risen in the Baby Boomer generation, Allison says, but he infers it’s because respondents feel increasingly uncertain about the markets and are struggling to meet everyday expenses. Using credit cards for monthly necessities they can’t afford otherwise is an issue across income levels, PwC found.

NEXT: Distracted by financial stress

Not surprisingly, employee financial stress rose this year with more than half (52%) of employees reporting that they find dealing with their financial situation stressful. Forty-five percent say their stress level regarding financial issues has increased over the past 12 months.

When asked what stresses them out most in life, 45% of respondents said financial challenges, compared with 20% who said their jobs, 15% each who said health concerns and relationships, and 6% who said other issues.

All of this financial stress can take a toll on work productivity. Twenty-eight percent of employees say that issues with personal finances have caused a distraction at work (up from 20% last year), and 46% of those who are distracted by finances at work say that they spend at least three hours each week at the office thinking about or dealing with issues related to their personal finances. What’s more is 28% of employees say these financial worries have affected their health, and 17% say they have caused decreased productivity at work. Millennials (12%) are more likely to have missed work occasionally due to their financial worries than Gen Xers (8%) or Baby Boomers (4%).

Considering all of these financial factors, Allison says plan sponsors and advisers should continue to explore holistic financial resources to pave the way for long-term savings. “The main thing we want to stress is while auto features are good to get people saving, you have to also couple that with resources to address the other issues,” Allison says.“If you’re getting them into the retirement plan, that’s great, but if you have lots of [leakage], it’s telling you you have another problem. We continue to tell plan sponsors to be holistic in their approach. Look at the other things that may impede or undermine their ability to save for retirement.”

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The full research report is presented here.

(b)lines Ask the Experts – How Does the DOL Fiduciary Rule Impact 403(b)s?

I have received dozens of emails in my Inbox regarding the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) final fiduciary rule.

“I realize that all these emails probably means that the new rule is important, but I don’t have time to sort through them all. As an Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) retirement plan sponsor, can the Experts give me the “Cliffs notes” on the new rule and how it affects me? 

Michael A. Webb, vice president, Cammack Retirement Group, and David Levine, with Groom Law Group, answer: 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Certainly! The Experts feel your pain—and they apologize if they’ve taken part in the clogging of your mailbox!

The final fiduciary rule, which was issued to much fanfare on April 6, is NOT primarily directed at plan sponsors, but at those firms and individuals who provide advisory services, investment products, and other investment-related services to retirement plan sponsors and their participants, IRAs and their owners. The “Cliffs notes” on the new rule, as you refer to them, are the following—with a key point being that a lot these rules have conditions and requirements, so few things are just a “free pass”:

1)      The rule redefines the term “fiduciary” as it applies to “investment advice” from advisers and retirement service providers. As a result, many service providers, particularly those who service participants, will become fiduciaries for either the first time or with respect to more of their activities. Under the old rules, some advisers (and service providers) were not subject to the fiduciary duties imposed by ERISA, the law governing retirement plans, or similar rules applicable to IRAs. Under the final rule, any individual receiving compensation for making investment recommendations that are individualized or specifically directed to a particular plan sponsor or fiduciary running a retirement plan (e.g., an employer with a retirement plan), plan participant, or IRA owner for consideration in making a retirement investment decision could be a fiduciary subject to the new rules (unless they satisfy certain exceptions from the rules).

2)      Many of the educational activities we currently have today will still be permitted, so that plan fiduciaries, sponsors and the entities who work with them will not risk becoming subject to the new fiduciary standard for advisers merely due to the fact that such education is provided. There was some concern that certain types of education that had previously been permitted—naming specific investment options in asset allocation models, for example—would no  longer be permitted, but the final rule dropped such restrictions for plans (but not IRAs)—but there are certain requirements that apply.

NEXT: The rule’s effect on retirement plan fiduciaries

As for its effect on retirement plan fiduciaries and sponsors, there will be little direct effect, but those who advise retirement plan participants, and the firms who employ such individuals, are likely to be affected. Further, if you deal with more complex investments (if you are a larger plan), some of your investment structures could be impacted. For example, if your recordkeeper employs individuals who provide advisory services to participants, those recordkeepers could be affected. It should be further noted that there are several provisions of the rules of direct relevance to plan sponsors:

1)      403(b) plans that are not subject to ERISA (i.e. governmental plans, church plans, and elective deferral-only plans utilizing the 29 CFR 2510.3-2(f) safe harbor) are not subject to the final fiduciary rule at all.  However, rollover IRAs from these plans could be caught in these rules.

2)      Recommendations to independent fiduciaries (and independence is explained in the rule) of plan sponsors managing more than $50 million dollars in assets will not be considered to be investment advice subject to the final fiduciary rule

3)      Employees of the plan sponsor will not become fiduciaries solely due to the fact that they provide advice to a plan fiduciary or an employee if the person receives no fee or other compensation in connection with the advice beyond the employee’s normal compensation for work performed for the employer.

The Experts could write a long article but we’ll leave it at here for now. Thank you for your question!

 

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.  

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to rmoore@assetinternational.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.
Reported by
Reprints
To place your order, please e-mail Reprints.

«