Four in 10 Canadians Say They’ll Postpone Retirement

September 8, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - According to the third annual survey of employees conducted by the Canadian Payroll Association (CPA), 40% of Canadians said they'll likely have to retire later than they previously planned.

On the West Coast, the number was similar to the national average with 40% of workers expecting they’ll have to postpone their retirement.   

A news release said the primary reason (cited by 40% of Canadians) was “I’m not saving enough money for retirement.” Almost three-quarters of employees (74%) said they have saved less than a quarter of their retirement savings goal. On the West Coast, the number is about the same at 73%.  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Half of employees across the country (45% on the West Coast) reported they are currently saving only 5% or less of their net pay. This is well below the 10% of net pay that financial planning experts generally recommend as a retirement savings rate, the news release noted.   

Almost two-thirds of Canadian workers (63%) felt they would need more than $750,000 in savings for a comfortable retirement.   

Most Canadians do understand what they could be doing to improve their financial situation and meet their retirement goals. Ranked in order of importance, respondents thought they should be spending less (32%), paying off credit card debt (22%), reducing their mortgage (19%) and contributing more to their retirement savings (14%).   

The CPA survey found the majority of Canadian workers continue to live pay cheque to pay cheque, with 57% saying they would be in financial difficulty if their pay was delayed by even a week. Workers on the West Coast are faring slightly better than those in other regions, but still 53% reported that they are living pay cheque to pay cheque.   

Two thousand seventy (2,070) employees responded to the online survey between July 6 and August 2, 2011.

4th Circuit Overturns Lower Court Ruling on Health Care Mandate

September 8, 2011 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – A U.S. appeals court ruled against the state of Virginia and others seeking to invalidate President Barack Obama’s health care law as unconstitutional.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court judge who had ruled the federal government could not compel people to buy health insurance or face paying a penalty, Reuters reports. (See Judge Strikes Down HCR Coverage Mandate) The individual mandate takes effect in 2014. 

Virginia had contended this provision conflicted with a state statute, giving it standing to challenge the federal law, but the appellate court found that Virginia did not have the right to challenge it and overturned the decision. One day after Congress passed the federal health care overhaul in March 2010, Virginia signed into law a measure aimed at protecting its residents from the federal law, but the court said that was merely a declaration and did not trump the federal government’s authority. 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

According to Reuters, the court did not address Virginia’s challenge to whether the mandate was constitutional. In a separate ruling, it ordered another lawsuit against the health care law, which targeted the penalty imposed for those who do not purchase insurance, be dismissed because the penalty has yet to be imposed. 

It was the second major victory at the appellate level for the White House in a case that will likely be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2011-12 term that begins next month. 

The 4th Circuit decision follows a similar one in late June by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld the individual mandate by ruling that Congress had the power to require Americans to buy health insurance. (See Court Upholds Ruling that Health Care Law is Constitutional).  

However, it contrasts with one by the 11th Circuit in August that ruled against the individual mandate requirement in a challenge brought by 26 states. (See 11th Circuit Finds Health Care Mandate Unconstitutional).  

Those conflicting decisions likely ensure the Supreme Court will have to step in to resolve the differences, Reuters said.  

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.