GAO Says More Knowledge Could Improve Social Security Decisions

The agency found a lack of understanding about Social Security benefits by many individuals.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) review of nine surveys and academic studies, and interviews with retirement experts, suggest that many individuals do not fully understand key details of Social Security rules that can potentially affect their retirement benefits.

As an example, GAO noted, while some people understand that delaying claiming leads to higher monthly benefits, many are unclear about the actual amount that benefits increase with claiming age.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

The studies and surveys also found widespread misunderstanding about whether spousal benefits are available, how monthly benefits are determined, and how the retirement earnings test works. GAO says understanding these rules and other information, such as life expectancy and longevity risk, could be central to people making well-informed decisions about when to claim benefits. By having this understanding of retirement benefits, people would also be in a better position to balance other factors that influence when they should claim benefits, including financial need, poor health, and psychological factors.

GAO observed 30 in-person claims at Social Security Administration (SSA) field offices and found that claimants were not consistently provided key information that people may need to make well-informed decisions. For example, in eight of 26 claims interviews in which the claimant could have received higher monthly benefits by waiting until a later age, the claims specialist did not discuss the advantages and disadvantages of delaying claiming. Further, only seven of the 18 claimants for whom the retirement earnings test could potentially apply were given complete information about how the test worked.

GAO noted that SSA’s Program Operations Manual System (POMS) states that claims specialists should explain the advantages and disadvantages of filing an application so that the individual can make an informed filing decision. The problems GAO observed during the claims interviews occurred in part because the questions included in the claims process did not specifically cover some key information.

Online applicants have more access to key information on the screen or through tabs and pop-up boxes as they complete an application, GAO found. However, similar to in-person interviews, the online application process does not inform claimants that benefits are based on the highest 35 years of earnings or that life expectancy is an important consideration in deciding when to claim.

GAO is making six recommendations to SSA, including that SSA take steps to ensure that claims specialists provide information on delayed benefits that is consistent with POMS, and that the claims process provides claimants better information about the retirement earnings test. The agency said SSA generally agreed with its recommendations.

The full GAO report may be accessed here. The GAO testified about its findings during a hearing before the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging this week.

In-Plan Income Is Crucial for DC Plan Success

An informative Issue Brief publication from the IRIC outlines ways DC plans can incorporate effective “de-accumulation” option. 

The Institutional Retirement Income Council (IRIC), a non-profit think tank for the retirement income planning industry, released a new issue brief on adding distribution options to defined contribution (DC) retirement plans. 

The paper, “The Evolving DC Plan – from Accumulation to De-accumulation,” addresses critical questions plan sponsors often ask and need to answer when evaluating whether to add distribution options to their DC retirement plans.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“With DC plans becoming the primary vehicle for employees to secure their retirement, today’s employees have a greater demand for features that can help them not only to save during their working years, but also to draw retirement income after they stop working,” IRIC explains.  “To help meet that demand, growing numbers of employers are considering adding various distribution options to their plans.”

According to the IRIC analysis, the most common options other than a lump-sum distribution are installment payments over a pre-determined period of time, periodic withdrawals without a fixed payment schedule, and an annuity. Some plans have found effective ways to implement these strategies, IRIC finds, but many more are not doing enough to ensure participant success on the back-end of the retirement savings effort.

“De-accumulation strategies are the natural next step in the evolution of retirement plan offerings,” suggests Robert Melia, vice president, product development, Retirement Plan Services, Lincoln Financial Group, and an IRIC adviser who co-authored the brief.  “While adding de-accumulation options can be beneficial to both plan sponsors and employees, the process of evaluating whether to offer one and which options make the most sense for an organization and their plan participants requires careful consideration.”

The IRIC issue brief provides answers to nearly a dozen frequently asked questions that can lead plan sponsors to a practical implementation of adding certain distribution options to a DC plan. The full Issue Brief is available online at http://iricouncil.org/thought

«