Hedging May Have Buffered DB Plan Losses in May

Defined benefit (DB) plans lost their 2019 funded status gains in May, and some firms say hedging liabilities would have helped.

All firms that monitor defined benefit (DB) plan funded status reported a bad month for pensions in May.

River and Mercantile reports that discount rates fell more than 20 basis points, and equities lost in excess of 5%. “Almost all plan sponsors should see a notable drop in funded status unless they are heavily hedged,” its Retirement Update for June says.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

According to Legal & General Investment Management America (LGIMA) there would be potential leverage benefits obtained through derivatives such as futures and swaps that would allow plans to gain market exposure without having to fully pay the cash cost up front. And, daily risk management ensures conservative capital requirements are met. Without leverage, $60 million in assets hedge $60 million in liabilities, but with leverage, $60 million in assets hedge $100 million in liabilities.

LGIMA estimates that the average plan’s funding ration fell 5% to 82.4% in May, primarily driven by negative equity performance and declines in Treasury yields which resulted in a decrease in the discount rate. LGIMA blames trade-wars in part for the negative equity performance and falling interest rates.

Brian Donohue, partner at October Three Consulting, says, “Pension finances got clobbered in May, due to falling stock markets and lower interest rates, giving back gains enjoyed earlier in the year.” Both model plans October Three tracks lost ground last month: Plan A lost 6% and is now down almost 2% for the year, while Plan B lost close to 2% and is now basically flat through the first five months of 2019. Plan A is a traditional plan (duration 12 at 5.5%) with a 60/40 asset allocation, while Plan B is a largely retired plan (duration 9 at 5.5%) with a 20/80 allocation with a greater emphasis on corporate and long-duration bonds.

According to Northern Trust Asset Management (NTAM), corporate pension plans experienced a significant decline in May as the average funded ratio dropped from 90% to 86%. Negative returns in the equity market along with higher liabilities led to unfavorable results in funded ratios. Global equity market returns were down approximately 5.9% during the month. The average discount rate decreased from 3.51% to 3.27% during the month, leading to higher liabilities.

The aggregate funded ratio for U.S. corporate pension plans decreased by 4.0 percentage points, reversing April’s increase, to end the month of May at 85.6%, according to Wilshire Consulting. The monthly change in funding resulted from a 0.8% decrease in asset values and a 3.8% increase in liability values. The aggregate funded ratio is down 1.9% year-to-date, and down 4.5% over the trailing twelve months.

Ned McGuire, managing director and a member of the Investment Management & Research Group of Wilshire Consulting, says, “May’s 4.0 percentage point decrease in funded ratio is the second largest monthly decline since January 2015.”

According to Mercer, the estimated aggregate funding level of pension plans sponsored by S&P 1500 companies decreased by 5% in May to 85%. The S&P 500 index decreased 6.35% and the MSCI EAFE index decreased 4.66% in May. Typical discount rates for pension plans as measured by the Mercer Yield Curve decreased from 3.84% to 3.63%.

“Despite decreases in interest rates earlier this year, the equity market drove funded status higher. However, the trend changed dramatically during May as the funded status gains we saw since the beginning of the year were completely erased with both interest rates and equities moving in the wrong direction,” says Scott Jarboe, a partner in Mercer’s U.S. Wealth business. “The persistent volatility serves as a reminder that pension risk management is an on-going process and plan sponsors must be diligent to ensure they are well prepared to weather the storm.”

(b)lines Ask the Experts – Must 403(b)s Adopt a Pre-Approved Plan Document?

Experts from Groom Law Group and Cammack Retirement Group answer questions concerning 403(b) plans and regulations.

“Our 403(b) plan recordkeeper wishes for us to adopt their pre-approved retirement plan document. However I am quite happy with our individually designed 403(b) plan document that was prepared by our outside retirement plan counsel. Do I have to use the recordkeeper’s document now or can I stick with the attorney-prepared document that I have?”

 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Stacey Bradford, Kimberly Boberg, David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, vice president, Retirement Plan Services, Cammack Retirement Group, answer:

 

This is an excellent question, and many sponsors are under the misconception that they MUST adopt a pre-approved retirement plan document by the March 31, 2020, deadline to adopt pre-approved plans. However, this is NOT the case. Plan sponsors must adopt a 403(b) plan document by March 31, 2020, that reflects all changes in the Code and Regulations (and changes in the plan) dating back to January 1, 2010 (or, if later, the date the plan came into existence). However, a plan sponsor need not adopt a pre-approved document to satisfy this requirement; they can certainly utilize a individually designed plan document to do so. If you are currently utilizing an individually designed plan document, you will want to confirm with your outside counsel that such requirements have been met.

 

Having said this, even though adopting a pre-approved retirement plan document is NOT mandatory, the IRS webpage in this regard lists some reasons that you may wish to consider adopting a pre-approved plan instead of maintaining your individually designed plan document, including the following:

 

1) Cost—the cost for a pre-approved plan document can be less than that of an individually designed plan document

2) Reliance—since there is no determination letter program for individually designed 403(b) plans, the only way you can obtain IRS approval that your plan document satisfies all requirements as to form is to adopt a pre-approved plan. However, the scope of that reliance may be limited, so you should check the pre-approved plan’s opinion or advisory letter for details.

3) Updates—the process for updating pre-approved plans for changes in the law requires your recordkeeper to notify you of such changes and provide amendment for signature. Though the process may be the same with your outside counsel, it is possible that the pre-approved process may be more proactive in terms of notification.

 

The Experts have seen individually designed plans that would not qualify for restatement onto a pre-approved document since they contain plan provisions that are not included in the pre-approved document. So, for some plan sponsors, having a choice of documents will be a moot point, as their specific plan design will require them to maintain their individually designed plan document unless they remove the provisions in question. Thus, all plan sponsors should consult with outside counsel well-versed in such matters to determine if their plan provisions are such that it would be possible to adopt a pre-approved document, and whether adopting a pre-approved plan would make sense in their particular situation.

 

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

 

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Rebecca.Moore@strategic-i.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.

«