Helping Employees Select the Best Health Plan Can Benefit Employers

Selecting the "wrong plan" may cause employees to pay more without getting more coverage or benefits in return,” HSA Bank says, and Chad Wilkins, president of HSA Bank, points out it could cost employers as well.

A recent HSA Bank survey of 100 human resources (HR) executives showed only 10% are “very confident” their employees understand the choices they are making with health insurance, while 75% believe employees are “somewhat confident.”

One-third (33%) of HR executives believe the copay amount is most important factor to employees when selecting a health plan, and 27% believe a low deductible or out-of-pocket maximum is most important. However, HSA Bank says in the survey report that it believes the total estimated annual cost of medical services (covered and out-of-pocket) should be the most determinative factor when selecting) a health plan; this is a better representation of actual annual health care expenses. Seventeen percent of the employers surveyed agreed.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“When employees do not understand their health plan options and the factors that influence health plan selection, they could end up making a costly mistake. Selecting the ‘wrong plan’ may cause employees to pay more without getting more coverage or benefits in return,” HSA Bank says.

Chad Wilkins, president of HSA Bank, points out that if employees select the wrong plan for them, it could cost employers as well. “Plan sponsors pay a portion of the premium to the insurance company for employee coverage. The higher the premium, the more the plan sponsor pays for health benefits. If an employee selects the health plan with the lower deductible, but the ‘cost’ of that lower deductible is a much higher premium, then the employee and plan sponsor will end up paying more. For example, if an employee can reduce their deductible by $500 for an additional premium cost of $750, they would have a lower deductible but would end up paying $250 more overall,” he says.

Wilkins adds that if one of the plans offered is a health savings account (HSA)-qualified high deductible health plan (HDHP), the plan sponsor and employee can also realize lower health benefit costs from HSA contributions in the form of federal insurance contribution act (FICA) tax savings.

According to the survey report, consumers can end up selecting the wrong plan for several reasons: uncertainty about plan cost sharing amounts, fear of a high deductible or out-of-pocket maximum, and lack of plan evaluation. “When employees see the cost of the deductible or out-of-pocket maximum associated with the HDHP option, they are sometimes deterred from considering that plan—even though it may be their most cost-effective option,” the report says.

Many employees do not take enough time to review their health plan options and do not make informed decisions based on their current options and circumstances. An Aflac survey found 80% of employees spent less than one hour, and 56% spent less than 30 minutes researching their options during their last open enrollment session. In addition, nearly all (93%) employees typically choose the same benefits (in terms of medical, dental, and vision) year after year.

“In order to determine the most cost-effective health plan option, both plan sponsors and employees would benefit from a health plan analysis that shows the total annual expenditure (premiums, deductible, out-of-pocket costs, HSA contributions and tax savings) at various levels of medical spend. In many cases, the lower premium plan will be the ‘right’ plan for employees, therefore reducing the plan sponsor’s health benefit costs,” Wilkins concludes.

The survey report may be downloaded from here.

Cash Incentives Boost Financial Wellness Program Performance

A report from Bank of America Merrill Lynch shows employees who do not feel financially well are most concerned about shorter-term financial goals, whereas employees who do feel financially well are most concerned about long-term goals.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch published its 2018 Workplace Benefits Report, presenting a wide-ranging overview of the financial wellness of workers in the United States.  

According to the report, both employees and employers agree that financial wellness programs are effective at reducing financial stress. In fact, fully 91% of employees who participate in a workplace financial wellness program say these resources have been effective at helping them to reduce debt, increase savings or otherwise improve their financial outlook in at least one material way. This compares with the 95% of employers who offer such programs agreeing that their financial wellness program has been effective in reaching its own work force goals.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Among the benefits of financial wellness programs cited by employers are greater employee satisfaction, lower employee turnover, improvements in productivity and even lower health care costs for the company. Thus, employers voice frustration that employee participation in voluntary financial wellness programs remains fairly low. According to the survey, while 48% of workers currently are offered a financial wellness program, just 31% of employees participate in these programs.

“The No. 1 way to increase participation, according to employers and employees, is to offer cash incentives or discounts to participants,” the report states. “Availability and the use of workplace financial wellness programs are not yet universal. Employers have significant room for improvement in increasing employee participation.”

Stepping back to define what financial wellness looks like, Bank of America Merrill Lynch says it sees financial wellness “as managing current finances while preparing for the future.”

“It is not about being wealthy, but being able to address short- and long-term financial goals,” the report suggests. “Those who feel like they are not doing financially well often bring financial stress to work, can be distracted on the job and have even reported negative health effects.”

The report shows employees cite a number of reasons for not taking charge of their financial wellness on their own. Many say they need help identifying appropriate goals, while others say they are already doing the best they can. Others say that thinking about finances is uncomfortable, or that they don’t know how to start, where to start or how to set priorities.

As employers might expect, the report shows employees who do not feel financially well are most concerned about shorter-term financial goals, whereas employees who do feel financially well are most concerned about long-term goals.

“Employee needs are not all the same,” the report warns. “The onus is on employers to make sure their financial wellness programs are designed to address a wide range of employee needs — not just planning for retirement.”

«