Higher Ed Institutions Facing Increased Turnover Due to Burnout During Pandemic

Plan sponsors can use benefit offerings to decrease their staff’s constant struggle with work/life balance and offer transition help to those who insist on retiring.

Higher education institutions are experiencing a higher rate of turnover as professors and employees leave the workforce due to growing burnout aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

A new Transamerica report finds the pivot to online education in the past year has augmented employee turnover, as 35% of higher education institutions report higher movement within their employee base. Thirty-three percent of institutions disclosed they are facing higher student-to-faculty ratios.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The turnover is likely due to employees struggling with their work/life balances in the past year, which can then bring on career dissatisfaction among workers. According to a recent study by Fidelity Investments that surveyed 1,100 faculty members, more than half (55%) of faculty at higher education institutions have seriously considered changing careers or retiring early, including 35% of tenured employees. Sixty-nine percent of faculty said they felt stressed last year, compared with 32% in 2019, while 35% felt angry in comparison to just 12% in 2019.

“There has been a lot of discussion about the impact on the student experience, but our questions were on the faculty who play such a critical role,” says Debra Frey, head of tax-exempt marketing and analytics at Fidelity Investments. “We were surprised to see the level of stress that many faculty members reported. A lot of that is due to feeling overworked, seeing workload increase and really as work/life balance gets worse due to that stress.”

Such a change brings adverse effects to higher education institutions, Frey notes, especially since colleges and universities often tout strong faculties to attract potential students. “Institutions are making sure they have the best talent—a diverse and strong representative workforce,” Frey says. “As you see some of these important faculty members choose to leave, the question becomes ‘How do I look at this impact and find a solution?’”

This question is especially important for retaining female faculty members, who have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic, as many reported feeling overworked and overwhelmed, according to Fidelity. Seventy-five percent of female faculty members reported feeling stressed, and 82% said their workload had increased as a result of the pandemic, compared to 70% of their male colleagues. Additionally, 74% indicated their work/life balance had deteriorated in 2020.

Throughout the pandemic, women have fared worse than their male counterparts and often been forced to juggle more. Because two out of every three caregivers in the United States are women, many women are forced to leave their careers. In September, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported 865,000 women had left the workforce.

“Like so many of us with challenges, they are either dealing with changes in child care and elder care or worrying about families and themselves, but also facing a dramatically changing professional experience,” Frey says.

To keep this workforce, institutions need to react and adapt based on their faculty’s needs. Start with acknowledging what your institution demands, Frey suggests.

“We are seeing colleges and universities reassess what they offer and looking at a total well-being perspective. They’re asking, ‘Are we providing access to things that will help mental health and well-being incentives? For professionals struggling with child care needs, do we offer backup child care services?’” she says.

On the retirement front, Wendy Daniels, vice president and not-for-profit practice leader at Transamerica, recommends employers and their retirement plan providers offer services to help faculty transition from full- or part-time work to retirement. According to the Transamerica study, 36% of institutions are extremely concerned that their faculty is unaware of the amount they’ll need for retirement.

“If faculty or staff are considering leaving the education system or retiring early, plan sponsors can help provide insight on issues participants may not have considered,” Daniels says. “Helping participants understand how to transition into retirement and creating a sustainable retirement income strategy are key.” She says sponsors should also stress health care costs in retirement and make sure their employees understand Social Security and Medicare programs.

Placing a greater emphasis on financial wellness tools and communications will also help employees and could help prevent high turnover rates. If a plan’s participants decreased or stopped contributing to the retirement plan or took a loan or distribution over the past year, sponsors would benefit from having a strategy to get them back on track, Daniels says. “Along with enhanced financial wellness programs, employers should also reinforce any employee benefits that may be available to ensure faculty and staff have the benefits they need to protect their savings from unexpected life events,” she says.

Pandemic Prompts Many to Take More Notice of Retirement Plan

Providers saw an increase in the use of digital tools, prompting some plan participants to save more.

Major retirement plan recordkeepers have found that the COVID-19 pandemic prompted many Americans to take better stock of their retirement and emergency savings. Many even increased their 401(k) contributions, and only a small percentage took out a coronavirus-related distribution (CRD).

TIAA found that more than three-quarters of participants in the plans it recordkeeps checked their account balance last year and 61% visited a provider website. This engagement, TIAA says, was likely driven by the dramatic volatility of the year. TIAA found also found that 30% of participants increased their plan contribution. Likewise, Fidelity Investments saw 33% of the participants in its plans increase their contribution.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

TIAA says that among those who increased their contribution, 48% said they did so after using an income projection tool.

“In the past year in particular, people have become more engaged with their retirement plan,” Dan Keady, chief financial planning strategist at TIAA, tells PLANSPONSOR. TIAA has seen this engagement through its website traffic, call center activity and participation in various participant webinars it has held in the past year, Keady says.

“They value the importance of their retirement plan more than ever before and are coming around to the fact that paying attention to their account is the right thing to do,” he says. “I think that in a year of such uncertainty, people wanted to take control of the things they could. They discovered that using the calculators and planning tools we offer can help them envision their lifestyle in retirement, and they can see that making even small changes today in terms of increasing savings can have a big outcome decades down the road. That makes the 30% increase in contributions an even more significant figure, given that many people experienced extreme financial duress in 2020.”

Keady says he is also encouraged that participants and sponsors alike are beginning to explore retirement income.

“Many institutions are equating what an individual’s savings can produce in the future,” Keady says. “People are becoming increasingly interested in this concept of lifetime income. All of these factors are coming together in a very positive way.”

Fidelity has witnessed a 40% year-over-year increase in traffic to its digital net benefits site, where retirement plan participants can see their balance and make changes, says Eliza Badeau, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity. Many visited Fidelity’s COVID-19 resource center to find out what relief is available to them and to seek guidance on sound uses of their stimulus money, Badeau says. Fidelity also found that only 12% of participants changed the asset allocation of their accounts last year. “Most didn’t react to the volatility,” she says.

Only 1.6 million participants in Fidelity plans took a CRD, averaging $9,400, she notes. This was only 6.3% of eligible employees, she adds.

“These figures are all good signs that people took only what they needed and did not come back for more,” she says.

Another positive sign from 2020 is that more employers are encouraging people to create emergency savings, she continues. “Overall, we saw positive behavior in 2020, despite the pandemic and market volatility.”

«