August 10, 2001 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Plan sponsors
with questions concerning changes in the healthcare system
can direct them to the HIPAA Hippo who has taken up residence
on the Washington State HIPAA Project Web page.
The page, sponsored by the Department of Social and
Health Services (DSHS), and other state agencies, was set
up to keep interested parties up to date with the effects
of the
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act (HIPAA).
The new Ask the HIPAA Hippo page allows interested
parties to e-mail questions about HIPAA and its
implications for offices, practices, programs or agencies
to the Hippo, the group’s unofficial mascot.
Lifestyles Often Viewed As Just Another Fund, Cautions
Hewitt
September 20, 2000 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Participants
may be investing with a bit too much "style," according to
new research from Hewitt Associates. The study found
that participants are treating so-called lifestyle funds as
"just another fund option," needlessly and probably
inadvertently investing too much in fixed income
investments.
Lifestyle funds are “premixed” portfolios, generally
designed so that participants can make a single investment
choice and invest in a diversified portfolio of funds.
Frequently, the funds are oriented toward a participant’s
age, or number of years until retirement.
The Hewitt study found that participants were investing
in both lifestyle funds and in individual fund choices,
effectively “doubling up” in certain categories. In fact,
only 12% of the participants with some allocation to
lifestyle funds had placed 100% of their non-company stock
monies in a single lifestyle fund.
For example, a participant might choose to invest 50% of
their balance in a lifestyle fund comprised of 60% stocks
and 40% bonds, and invest the remaining half of their
account balance in a fixed income fund. The combined effect
of those decisions would put 70% of the participant’s
balance in fixed income investments.
“We found that very few participants were simply
matching their risk profile with an appropriate lifestyle
fund,’ said Lori Lucas, defined contribution consultant,
Hewitt Associates. “In fact, many participants who used
lifestyle funds weren’t choosing one lifestyle fund, but
allocating to several lifestyle funds at once. Clearly,
lifestyle funds are not being used as the simple,
straightforward investment solution they are intended to
be.”
Time Frames
Hewitt’s research found that participants do pay
attention to time horizons in choosing lifestyle funds.
Younger participants had a bias toward aggressive lifestyle
funds, while older participants have a bias toward
conservative and moderate lifestyle funds.
However, lifestyle funds do appear to encourage
investors who otherwise wouldn’t invest in equities, such
as older participants, to do so.
Plan sponsors might:
Require participants to invest 100% of their balance
in a single lifestyle fund
Consider offsetting the mix/match mentality by making
the conservative and aggressive lifestyle funds better
differentiated in terms of equity allocation
Communicate the lifestyle choices as a separate
category of investment for participants that aren’t
comfortable, or ready to make individual fund
choices
Consider offering third-party investment advice
According to Hewitt, nearly a third (30%) of plans
offered a lifestyle option in 1999, up from 19% in 1997 and
9% in 1995.
The Hewitt study examined the use of lifestyle
portfolios in a U.S. company’s 401(k) plan with 4,000
participants and 12 investment options, including three
lifestyle funds.
The results were supported by a subsequent examination
of the use of lifestyle funds at four additional companies
with more than 90,000 participants.