How Does a Roth Distribution Into an IRA Affect Subsequent IRA Distributions?

Experts from Groom Law Group and CAPTRUST answer questions concerning retirement plan administration and regulations.

Q: I read the recent Ask the Experts column in which you indicated that a Roth 403(b) account could be distributed entirely tax-free once a participant attains age 59 ½ AND owns the Roth account for five years, presuming that the plan allows for such a distribution. If I roll over the Roth distribution to an IRA, does a new five-year clock start on subsequent distributions from the IRA account? And, if I also have pretax money in my 403(b), can I just designate the Roth source for rollover or does the IRS require distribution of the pretax funds as well?

Kimberly Boberg, Taylor Costanzo, Kelly Geloneck and David Levine, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, senior financial adviser at CAPTRUST, answer:

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

A: The rollover from a Roth 403(b) could indeed start a new five-year clock in the Roth IRA, which would require the participant to wait another five years before taking a tax-free distribution from the Roth IRA. The only exception would be if the Roth IRA (or any Roth IRA of the participant) were already in existence PRIOR to the rollover, in which case the time that a Roth IRA was in existence would count towards the five-year clock. For example, if a Roth IRA had been in existence for seven years prior to the rollover, there would be no additional waiting period for a tax-free distribution. If a Roth IRA were in existence for two years prior to the rollover, then the five-year clock would be shortened to three years.

As for completing such a rollover when pretax funds are also present in a participant’s 403(b) account, the pretax funds may have no effect on this transaction. Plan terms could permit a rollover to be directed solely from the Roth account, without any required distribution from the pretax funds or any account proration based on pretax funds present. There are rules requiring that a pro-rata portion of pretax and after-tax (including Roth) funds be distributed if a rollover of after-tax funds was desired, but separate accounting of these amounts under the plan (and corresponding plan language) allows for more flexibility.

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Amy.Resnick@issgovernance.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future column.

American Airlines Motion Argues ESG Funds Theory is “Wrong”

The argument about ESG funds by former pilot Bryan Spence ‘runs headlong into the Supreme Court's instruction,’ according to the defendants.

In American Airlines’ latest effort to get a complaint dismissed from federal court, its attorneys last week filed the latest rebuttal to claims made by the plaintiff, former pilot Bryan Spence.

In Spence v. American Airlines et al., the plaintiff alleges that two American Airlines Inc. defined contribution plans defaulted Spence and other participants into underperforming funds that utilize environmental, social and governance factors in investment selection. The two sides have been exchanging motions in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division, arguing for and against dismissal.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

In supplementing their motion to dismiss, attorneys for American Airlines replied to additional motions from the complainant by arguing that Spence has not demonstrated he was affected by conditions sufficient to bring the lawsuit because he was never invested in any of the challenged funds.

The amended complaint asserts two theories of liability: the challenged fund theory, which challenges the plans’ alleged inclusion of ESG funds as investment options, and the challenged manager theory, which challenges the plans’ use of managers who allegedly used their proxy voting power to support ESG initiatives.

“[Spence] contends that because he can assert an interest in some grievance that can be framed as a fiduciary breach (his Challenged Manager theory), he can pursue any other supposed breaches, regardless of whether those other breaches have had any effect on him,” American Airlines attorneys wrote. “That contention is as wrong as it sounds, and it runs headlong into the Supreme Court’s instruction that ‘standing is not dispensed in gross,'” cited from TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision reversed and remanded in 2021 by a 5 to 4 decision.

Spence’s challenged manager contention also fails as “also legally groundless,” attorneys for the defendants wrote in the October 13 reply memorandum.

“Despite Plaintiff’s effort to reframe the issue, the critical pleading flaw in this theory is not his failure to allege an injury,” attorneys wrote. “Rather, it is that he has failed to allege facts sufficient to infer a breach.”

The airline and the employee benefits committee criticized additional arguments by Spence presented before the court.

“Defendants have shown that the duty to monitor individual investments does not extend to brokerage windows,” the supplemental motion states. “Plaintiff’s only rejoinder is to argue that the court must credit his contrary allegations, but the rule that a plaintiff’s allegations must be accepted as true does not apply to conclusions of law. As plaintiff offers no response to defendants’ argument that the duty does not apply as a matter of law, he concedes the issue.”

The defendants filed the reply in support of the motion to dismiss following Spence’s legal team referencing another federal court’s decision that the plaintiff claims supports denying the motion to dismiss. American Airlines’ motion to dismiss was filed last month.

Neither attorneys for the defendants nor the plaintiffs returned requests for comment on the lawsuit.

«

 

You’ve reached your free article limit.

  You’re out of free articles!! 

Subscribe to a free PW newsletter - get free online access!

 Don’t leave before subscribing! 

If you’re a subscriber, please login.