Along with its annual survey, the insurance information provider tabulates these duties are worth $137,795 this year, an increase over last
year’s estimate of $134,944.
To calculate Santa’s value, Insure.com estimated the number
of hours he might spend at each important task—investigator of the naughty,
list checker, workshop manager, delivery driver and many others—and used data
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to find the closest matching occupations
and average hourly wages.
When asked how much Santa should be paid, adults responding to the survey tended to
be either very stingy or very generous:
Santa should not be paid. His work should be charitable
(37%);
Approximately $1 for every child younger than age 15 in
the world, or $1.8 billion a year (27%);
Between $100,000 and $200,000 a year (15%);
Less than $100,000 a year (12%); and
More than $200,000 a year (9%).
Those who expect pro bono service likely
wouldn’t give Santa any sick days. Nonetheless, Insure.com asked who should
fill in for Santa if he calls out sick on Christmas Eve. There were several
categories of choices, but actor Tim Allen snags the sleigh keys based on his
past “job experience.”
Because they have played Santa before, respondents chose:
Tim Allen in “The Santa Clause” (27%);
John Goodman in “The Year Without a Santa Claus” (15%);
Tom Hanks in “Polar Express” (13%);
Billy Bob Thornton in “Bad Santa” (2%); and
Bryan Cranston in “’Twas the Night” (1%).
Because they have plenty of money to spend on presents:
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates (14%); and
Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett (7%).
Because he wouldn’t forget to feed the reindeer:
Animal expert Jack Hanna (6%).
Because they would keep the elves in line:
Businessman Donald Trump (5%);
TV host Bill O’Reilly (3%); and
New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick (2%).
Because they make magic:
Illusionist David Copperfield (4%); and
Illusionist David Blaine (1%).
Insure.com surveyed 2,000 people age 18 and older.
Respondents were split evenly between males and females, and distributed across
age groups according to Census data on age distribution. The online survey was conducted
during October.
Since
the first TDFs were introduced in 1994, and the 2006 Pension Protection Act
granted safe harbor for plan fiduciaries using TDFs as a Qualified Default
Investment Alternative (QDIA), more than 50 fund families have developed TDFs,
and the number is growing. It is a
common misconception that TDFs are all alike. They are very different in their
makeup and design.
In
February 2013, the Department of Labor issued guidelines for TDFs, “Target Date
Retirement Funds – Tips for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries,” which urged plan sponsors
to analyze their TDFs, and compare and document the selection process (see “EBSA Offers Tips for Selecting TDFs”). With more than 70% of plan sponsors using TDFs as the default
investment option, it is up to the plan sponsor, with the help of its adviser, to
understand the differences and select the most appropriate TDFs for its plan.*
However,
with more than 50 different TDFs to compare, how do you select the most
appropriate TDF series for your retirement plan?
Here
are variables and items to consider when selecting an appropriate TDF:
Performance
of 10 or more different retirement date specific funds;
Glide
paths both “to” and “through” retirement;
Number
of asset classes used to make up the TDF and the underlying funds that
represent the asset classes;
Actively
versus passively managed funds;
Open
architecture design; and
Expense ratios.
When
analyzing a complex problem with multiple variables, it is important to
investigate each variable and develop a screening process to determine their
impact on the overall performance. For
TDFs, the ten steps listed below can be used to analyze different TDF products,
and determine and document the most appropriate selection for a retirement
plan.
1.
Remove
all the TDFs that don’t have three or five years of documented performance, or
the minimum indicated in your investment policy statement (IPS). This simple screen will eliminate a number of
the TDFs offered.
2.
Determine
if your plan rules allow participants to stay in the plan after retirement,
which would make a “through” retirement TDF appropriate. If your plan requires participants to remove
their balance at a specified age, usually normal retirement age, a “to” retirement
TDF would be appropriate. This process
eliminates even more TDFs.
3.
Eliminate
any provider duplication of TDFs. For
example, some TDF providers offer multiple variations of their TDFs.
4.
This
goes back to one of the basics:
Diversification is essential. While
it does not protect against market risk or guarantee that the portfolio will
enhance overall returns or outperform a non-diversified portfolio, it does
spread a participant’s investment across more asset classes in the event one
(or more) of the asset classes underperforms the market. With the help of your adviser, select a
minimum number of asset classes (or underlying mutual funds) you want to make
up the TDFs.
5.
Determine
whether the underlying investments are actively or passively managed, or a
combination of both. Also, decide if
this is an important factor in your selection process.
6.
This
is a fundamental part of fund selection: Open architecture. An open architecture TDF fund manager uses
funds from a variety of investment companies, where a closed architecture TDF
fund manager generally uses proprietary funds or funds from an affiliate.
7.
Analyze
the glide path. Glide path is the term
used to describe the shift in asset allocation a TDF will make over time. The focus is on the rate of change and the
timing of the change in allocation. The
largest diversion in the asset allocation, from fund family to fund family,
occurs in those funds closest to today’s date.
At this point, you can eliminate the TDFs whose glide path is too
aggressive or too conservative.
Once
you have completed these seven steps, the selection should be reduced to a
handful of TDF providers.
8.
Review
the overall performance on the one-, three- and five-year basis or longer if
available. Since retirement savings is
long term investing, I suggest focusing on, at a minimum, the five-year numbers.
9.
Place
a higher degree of importance on those funds within 15 years of retirement. As participants reach their retirement date,
they have less time to recover from a market downturn. You want these funds to
be consistent and have less market risk. The amount of equities held varies
widely in the 2025 funds than those funds closer to today’s date. The 2030 funds and further away from
retirement, hold a consistently high content in equity funds. At this point, for
example, you could exclude a 2015 fund that allocates too much or too little to
equity based funds.
10.
Look
at which TDFs have the lowest expense ratios.
This is another simple and consistent tool for evaluation that can be
documented.
You
started with a large number of TDFs. Completing
these steps, you have narrowed the field to the options that are most
appropriate for your plan. You have a
documented process for your selection and how you made that decision.
In
selecting new TDFs, or to determine if the TDFs you already have are
appropriate, the first step is to decide how you want your TDFs to be used in
the plan. Then screen the TDFs that meet
your criteria and document the results.
In making any investment decision, it is key to document the series of
decisions that lead you to the funds you have selected.
Robert A. Kieckhefer
with the Kieckhefer Group in Brookfield, Wisconsin. You can contact Robert
Kieckhefer at (262) 784-0754. Securities
and advisory services offered through LPL Financial, a Registered Investment
Advisor, Member FINRA/SIPC.
*The Profit Sharing Council of America’s 55th Annual Survey (“PSCA Survey”).
The" target date" of a target-date fund is the approximate date when
investors plan to start withdrawing their money. The principal value of a
target fund is not guaranteed at any time, including at the target date.
There is no assurance that the techniques and strategies discussed will yield
positive outcomes for your retirement plan. The opinions voiced in this article
are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific
advice or recommendations for any retirement plan. To obtain advice as the plan
sponsor of your retirement plan, please consult your financial adviser.
This feature is to provide general
information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or
substituted for legal or tax advice.