How to Teach Fiduciary Responsibility to Plan Committees

Where to find education and training, how often to meet and how to confirm members are prepared to serve participants well.

Sponsors of retirement plans, especially those covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, must ensure their retirement plan committee members are trained to understand and execute their fiduciary duties.

To do so, plans find fiduciary education and training from regulators, existing providers and a wide variety of sources. They may consult the Department of Labor, nonprofit professional human resource management associations and existing providers as sources of retirement oversight committee education and training, enabling committee members to understand their fiduciary duties.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Regardless of the education and training sources selected, tools and training must ensure the committee members know they are bound under the law to operate the retirement plan in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. The 1974 law mandates that retirement plan committees must “run the plan solely in the interests of participants and beneficiaries and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits and paying plan expenses.”

Two defined contribution plan sponsors—Ingevity Corp., offering a 401(k) plan, and MRIGlobal, providing a 403(b) plan—described how they provide their committees with tools and training.

Committees’ Fiduciary Responsibility

Individuals who serve on a retirement plan committee take on the role of plan fiduciary. Were the plan to violate ERISA and face legal action, committee members could be personally liable to restore any losses to the plan or to restore any profits made through improper use of plan assets, DOL regulations state.  

“The big thing that the committee needs to be educated about is their fiduciary role under ERISA, and that’s a very high standard that ERISA imposes,” explains ERISA attorney Joan Neri, counsel at Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

Operating a plan in accordance with ERISA is a “huge fiduciary responsibility,” says Tamra Miller, benefits manager at Ingevity, a South Carolina-based specialty chemicals company. Ensuring the plan is operated “responsibly by people who know what they’re doing” is critical.  

Ingevity’s committee convenes regular meetings both fiduciary compliance and to talk about plan compliance, she adds: “Your [fiduciary] responsibility really is to the participants, and you want to make sure that the people making those decisions for the plan are making them based on the right information.”

Monica De Agostino, human resources manager at Kansas City, Missouri-based MRIGlobal, an independent, not-for-profit, contract research organization, says an overarching goal of each committee education tool and training is “being proactive” and “setting the members up for success.”

Finding Committee Education and Training

Ingevity and MRIGlobal use different education and training sources, but both strive to ensure that committee members understand their fiduciary responsibility. Retirement benefits and committee oversight requires that members remain informed.

There is “a lot of reading, obviously,” says Miller.

The plan sponsor consults their ERISA counsel as the “best source of information,” Miller explains. “I rely on my ERISA counsel a lot; also two of my [benefits] brokers.”

Complying with legislation such as the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 may require Miller to consult recordkeeper and 401(k) administrator Empower; the Society for Human Resource Management; and the International Foundation for Employee Benefit Plans, she adds.

MRIGlobal works closely with management consulting company CBIZ to bolster plan oversight and educate and train the retirement plan committee, says De Agostino. 

“While we were doing our [recent fiduciary] training, we were also doing our own checks and balances as we were going through” plan data, comparing MRIGlobal’s plan fees and best practices to those of competitors, says De Agostino. 

Although the committee members “understand the concept of fiduciary, the duty to minimize plan risks, document the fiduciary process” and that they are responsible for “making sure we do what’s best for our [retirement plan] participants,” CBIZ added value, she says.  

“What CBIZ was able to do, as our trainers and fiduciary [and] as our adviser: They were able to also help us score ourselves, as we were looking at how are we doing and what are the areas for improvement that we have?” De Agostino says.

Using Education and Training Tactics

Plan sponsors must keep close and consult often the DOL’s guidance booklet, Meeting Your Fiduciary Responsibilities, explains MRIGlobal’s retirement plan adviser, Jack Keller, a vice president at CBIZ. Keller distributes the DOL booklet, which outlines how to monitor plan fees, “from the horse’s mouth,” he says, following every client training.

Fiduciaries “don’t have to make perfect decisions, but they have to make prudent decisions,” Keller explains. “As a fiduciary, you have a real legal responsibility in overseeing these plans and participant assets.”

Making prudent fiduciary decisions for the plan involves staying informed and monitoring recordkeeping, administration and investment fees, adds Keller. Sponsors should know that “[plan] fees don’t have to be the lowest, but they need to be competitive and benchmarked, also, with the services provided,” he explains.  

The MRIGlobal 403(b) plan also uses CBIZ as a 3(21) adviser to provide advice about the plan’s investment lineup, while leaving final discretion over the plan to the plan sponsor.

CBIZ works with third parties RPAG to assess the plan’s investment fees and Ann Schleck & Co. LLC to secure financial consulting services, explains Keller.

Education Formats and Frequency

Retirement plan committees should convene meetings at least twice per year, including one session dedicated to fiduciary training, advises Theresa Conti, a senior consultant at retirement company and plan consultant July Business Services, while adding some committees have as many as four meetings per year.

For best results, Conti advises working with the plan sponsor’s adviser.

Finding education and training “should be driven by the financial adviser,” Conti says. “I always view them as the quarterback of the plan, connecting the plan sponsor with the service providers, TPAs [and] recordkeepers.”

Another alternative, for plans that use a 3(16) fiduciary, is, “maybe [committee tools and training] can be driven instead by the 3(16), or in conjunction with 3(16) and the adviser,” she says.

A 3(16) fiduciary is a third party responsible for the administrative duties of the retirement plan, from determining plan eligibility to processing plan changes, while a 3(21) adviser works with the plan’s investments.

Consulting with July—as MRIGlobal collaborates with existing provider CBIZ—to thoroughly examine the plan to improve it, plan sponsors may similarly secure fiduciary services that add value, Conti says. Plan sponsors can consult with their existing providers to “help with topics,” and Conti can follow up with the plan to correct any issues, she adds.  

July will consult with sponsors on longer-term plan issues, following the plan’s yearly rote tasks, completing compliance testing and filing its Form 5500, Conti says.

For sponsors, after completing annual compliance tasks is a suitable time to benefit from the expertise of existing providers such as July that can examine the plan, addressing “things that we found; the things we need to change; things that we should do differently next year; a plan amendment that we need; or are we going to switch some of our design? It [also] gives [the provider] the opportunity to talk through [changes] with the SECURE 2.0 legislation,” Conti says. 

Testing, Testing: 1, 2, 3

Neri uses follow-up trainings to evaluate committee members’ understanding of materials, confirming if they understand and have retained the information. 

“When I do follow-up training, I often do conduct that in sort of an engaged Q&A format, and it gives me a feeling as to whether or not the members understand,” she explains. “If they don’t, then I drill down.”

Plan sponsors have also started using workplace tools to test committee members’ knowledge with a quiz about the materials they learned, adds Keller. 

“We did [training] for another client where there is a quiz and there are online modules … [for obtaining] the certificate of completion,” he says.

Conti notes that such quizzes, to certify completion and obtain fiduciary certification, more frequently “in bigger companies” than at smaller firms.

Though Paid Leave Benefits Are Common, Industry Groups Seek Nationwide Standard

While the majority of employers offer some sort of paid leave, some employees are not taking full advantage of the benefit due to heavy workload and staffing issues.

Paid leave benefits provide an opportunity for employers to set themselves apart, as flexible, paid time off can attract talent, prevent employees from experiencing burnout and retain workers by allowing them to have a healthy work-life balance.

The International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans’ recent survey on paid leave trends in the U.S. provided a glimpse into what organizations are currently offering for vacation, sick leave, parental leave and bereavement leave. The IFEBP conducted its survey in October 2023, surveying more than 300 U.S. corporations and public employers/governmental entities on policies for both full- and part-time employees.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Although federal law does not require employers to offer paid vacation time to their workers, nearly all (99%) companies surveyed reported offering this benefit, and for most organizations, the number of available paid vacation days increases with the length of service. The majority of employers also said they allow for some unused PTO days to be carried over to the next year.

When asked about the use of PTO, 42.7% of respondents said most of their company’s employees use their PTO, but heavy workload was the most common reason cited for workers not using PTO, followed by a lack of adequate staffing and needing to coordinate time off with other staff members.

Most employers said they encourage their salaried and hourly employees to take PTO but do not require a minimum level of usage. Only 9% of employers reported offering unlimited PTO or unlimited vacation. The IFEBP found that most organizations with unlimited PTO began offering it within the last four years.

The majority of employers (71.8%) said the reason they offer a PTO plan is because it offers employees flexibility, and 49.1% said it empowers employees.

Almost all employers also reported offering paid sick leave, including 11% mandated by state or local laws. Unlike PTO or vacation, most organizations provide a flat number of sick days, regardless of length of service, for salaried and hourly workers. The number of sick days offered is very similar for salaried and hourly employees, as the majority of organizations offer between six and 10 days.

Paid parental leave is slightly less common, but still offered by a majority, as 62% reported offering this benefit. Among those offering paid parental leave, different types reported include PTO for:

  • Adoption (76%)
  • Bonding (68%)
  • Maternity (67%)
  • Paternity (66%)
  • Parental/family leave (64%)
  • Foster care (50%)
  • Surrogate leave (for intended parents, not the surrogate) (32%)
  • Leave related to miscarriage (29%)
  • Fertility treatment (8%)

Bereavement leave is the most offered leave besides vacation, as 90% of organizations offer this benefit. Most organizations that offer bereavement leave do so in a separate plan, and the average number of days off provided varies by the relationship of the deceased to the employee. For example, leave for the death of a close friend or chosen family member is typically one day, whereas immediate family is typically five days.

The report explained that bereavement leave policies were originally enacted to give employees time to handle the logistics of funeral arrangements, which is why most employers still offer a relatively small number of days. However, employers are increasingly realizing that employees need more time to grieve, and many are expanding this benefit.

In related news, the American Benefits Council sent a letter to Congress on Tuesday, urging lawmakers to expand access to paid leave for all Americans. The letter was a response to a request for information issued by a bipartisan working group on paid leave in late 2023, seeking “suggestions for expanding access to paid parental, caregiving and personal medical leave in a bipartisan and fiscally responsible way.”

The American Benefits Council proposed a voluntary federal private employer plan option for paid family and medical leave benefits, under which employers who provide a minimum standard of paid family and medical leave benefits would be deemed in compliance with any state requirements. The council argued that using this approach, state paid family and medical leave programs would continue to operate and play a “core role” in delivering paid leave benefits to employees not covered by an employer-provided plan that satisfies such standards.

The ERISA Industry Committee submitted comments on paid leave on Wednesday, arguing that the array of state efforts expanding access to paid family and medical leave benefits has created a complex and “incompatible” system of state laws that have raised compliance costs and administrative complexity. ERIC emphasized the need for the working group to explore proposals that “harmonize paid leave standards” so that employers and workers can benefit from an improved system that promotes “efficiency and uniformity.”

«