HSA Contributions Lowest by Participants Who Need Them Most

For example, manufacturing employers were the highest users of HDHPs, but manufacturing employees contribute the least to HSAs.

A look at large employers on the Benefitfocus Platform indicated that more than half now offer a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) in addition to traditional copay-based plans such as preferred provider organizations (PPOs) and health maintenance organizations (HMOs).

Among the top three industries represented on the Benefitfocus Platform, education appears to be the least eager to introduce HDHPs, with only 23% of these employers offering at least one HDHP, either alongside traditional plans or as the only option. Manufacturing leads in the variety of plan options and is the only one of the three industries to offer a combination of HDHPs and traditional plans at a higher rate than traditional plans alone. Health care employers’ offering of HDHPs falls in between education and manufacturing.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

However, the analysis discovered that employee contributions to health savings accounts (HSAs) and flexible spending accounts (FSAs) typically fell well short of their potential. Even when employer contributions are added, a significant gap remains between contribution limits and actual contributions.

For the 2016 plan year, employees in manufacturing on average contribute the least amount to both HSAs and FSAs, with contributions below each of the platform averages for individual and family accounts. As manufacturing has the highest rate of employees enrolled in non-HMO plans (i.e., plans that carry deductibles), these employees would appear to have the least amount of money to help them cover their plan expenses.

On the contrary, employees in education, who have the lowest out-of-pocket plan costs, contribute to FSAs and HSAs at amounts that exceed the platform average. However, employees in all three top industries are not using these accounts to their full potential.

Benefitfocus says this presents employers with an opportunity to emphasize the use of HSAs and FSAs as important financial wellness tools.

The report of Benefitfocus’ findings can be downloaded from here. A free registration is required.

Another Firm Targeted by DOL Over Inaccurate ESOP Valuations

An Ohio-based transportation and logistics company is accused of overpricing its company stock by nearly $6 million. 

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) filed a lawsuit to restore nearly $6 million in losses to the Triple T Transport Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP).

Based in Lewis Center, Ohio, the company is accused by DOL of violating  the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by authorizing the plan to purchase 80% of the company’s stock for $17.46 million in January 2011, “an amount at least $5.9 million higher than the stock’s fair market value.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

The complaint alleges that a plan service provider, Fiduciary Trust Services, along with the firm’s ownership, “caused the plan to overpay by, among other things, failing to properly review and recognize the errors in a valuation analysis and fairness opinion provided to the company by ComStock Valuation Advisors Inc.”

According to DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) investigation, “ComStock reporting used an unreasonably high long-term growth rate for the company; added an improper control premium; erred in its calculation of the weighted average cost of capital; selected comparable companies that were drastically different from the company; and failed to value warrants for the selling shareholders correctly.”

Based on the ComStock reporting, DOL says Triple T ownership failed to accurately determine the fair market value of their company and arrived at a value $5.9 million more than the actual value.  The suit seeks to require Fiduciary Trust Services Inc. and the company to restore all losses suffered by the ESOP, plus interest.

In a statement to PLANSPONSOR, Fiduciary Trust Services said, “We believe the complaint is without merit, and we intend to defend our position vigorously.”

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the South District of Ohio, Eastern Division, under the docket number 2:16-cv-00612

«