ICI Data Reveals No Increase in DC Plan Withdrawals and Loans

DC plan participants also continue to contribute and mostly keep their investment allocations the same.

Withdrawal and contribution data indicate that essentially all defined contribution (DC) plan participants continued to save in their retirement plans at work last year, according to “Defined Contribution Plan Participants’ Activities, 2016,” by the Investment Company Institute (ICI).

ICI data shows that in 2016, 3.3% of defined contribution plan participants took withdrawals from their  plan accounts, with 1.5% taking hardship withdrawals. These levels of activity are similar to 2015, ICI says.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Loan activity in 2016 remained in line with more recent quarters, when it stabilized after a three-year rise. The percentage of defined contribution plan participants with loans outstanding rose from the end of 2008 (15.3%) through 2011 (18.5%). That percentage leveled out in 2012 through 2014. At year end 2016, the percentage was 17.0%, compared with 17.4% at year end 2015.

The ICI research also found the share of participants that stopped making contributions last year was similar to activity in prior years. In 2016, 2.7% of DC plan participants stopped contributing, compared with 2.6% in 2015 and 2.8% in 2014. It is possible that some of these participants stopped because they had reached the annual contribution limit, ICI says.

During 2016, 9.4% of DC plan participants had changed the asset allocation of their account balances, compared with 9.7% during 2015. Reallocation activity regarding contributions in 2016 was slightly lower than in recent years: 5.6% of DC plan participants changed the asset allocation of their contributions in 2016, compared with 7.6% in 2015 and 6.6% in 2014.

Defined contribution plan assets are a significant component of Americans’ retirement assets, representing more than one-quarter of the total retirement market and about one-tenth of U.S. households’ aggregate financial assets at year end 2016, according to ICI data.

ICI has been tracking participant activity through recordkeeper surveys since 2008. The recordkeeping firms represent a broad range of DC plans and cover more than 29 million employer-based defined contribution retirement plan participant accounts as of December 2016.

The full report is here.

Integration Boosts Performance of Financial Wellness Programs

Having a financial wellness program is becoming a must for employers wanting to stay competitive, says a recent Charles Schwab survey of corporate executives.

A new survey from Charles Schwab of U.S. corporate executives finds that the right financial wellness programming can be very successful at driving higher utilization and appreciation of employer-sponsored savings and investment benefits.

But how can plan sponsors create an effective financial wellness solution? The answer ultimately depends on the needs of the employer’s unique work force, but certain components can benefit all.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Nathan Voris, managing director of business strategy for Retirement Plan Services at Charles Schwab, tells PLANSPONSOR that a good financial wellness program is holistic, heavily data-driven, goals-based, and integrated into the overall benefits package in a thoughtful way. A good place to start building a new program—or revamping an old one—is with a thorough examination of participant demographics, which can unearth specific financial management needs that should be addressed.

“If you have a population that is approaching retirement, has experienced a frozen DB [defined benefit] plan, and has a very specific need of income planning, then you should build a very tailored program to meet those challenges,” Voris observes. He notes that, in large companies, two participants in the same location and at the same age can have very different wellness needs based on factors that may be unobservable in the normal workplace routine, so some elements of customization will generally make sense.  

He says it may help to look at employee wellness needs in a spectrum ranging from basic budgeting to more complex long-term investing and retirement savings goals. Supplementing what the employer can deliver are various financial planning tools, available from providers to help participants first identify and then address their financial planning needs.

“It’s less about building solutions and more about getting people involved with things we may have already built and have been using successfully for years,” Voris says. “It’s about meeting the participants where they are and how they want to be educated, versus building a shiny new toy.”

And there seems to be a growing demand among participants for their employers’ guidance in financial planning. Charles Schwab’s 2016 401(k) Participant Survey found that 85% of employees would take advantage of a financial wellness program if offered one. Voris says the rate was “higher than expected.”

Against this backdrop, Schwab’s recent executive survey finds that 52% of respondents say they have implemented or are considering a financial wellness program. Overall, 44% believe that a financial wellness program is becoming a “must-have” benefit in order to remain competitive.

NEXT: Integration can be key to a successful financial wellness program

A financial wellness program does not have to be costly to execute or difficult to implement. These programs can rely on using the right data from providers to pinpoint participants’ most pressing needs, and then the programming can be developed from components of benefits already in place within a plan sponsor’s compensation arsenal.

In its executive survey analysis, Charles Schwab notes, “Today’s 401(k) and equity compensation plans are already structured to arm participants with knowledge and encourage active engagement, and [therefore] these plans may be leveraged to build a financial wellness program without adding cost or significant resource demands.”

Voris suggests “mak[ing the program] as personalized as possible, based on what the data tells you about what participants need and want. Sometimes it can be as simple as adding a financial well-being component to the health and wellness piece.” He adds that Charles Schwab has seen success with clients that offer their employees perks such as gift cards and redeemable points for making certain positive decisions—e.g., listening to health-related content on provider websites or taking health screenings. He adds that clients are also increasingly considering switching to high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) with health savings accounts (HSAs) in order to help participants begin thinking about retirement and long-term health care planning hand-in-hand.

“We are seeing larger employers hiring third parties to help them integrate across all benefits solutions and thinking about it more holistically,” explains Voris. “As a plan sponsor, you have to have partners that are willing to do their piece and not expect to own the whole solution. Certain partners you have may be more qualified to do certain things.”

When asked about the best way to structure a financial wellness program, more than half (59%) of executives said it should be integrated with the entire employee benefits package.

“The path to financial wellness often starts at work, and it is encouraging to see so many companies moving toward making it a priority,” Voris concludes. “Employers can play a huge part in helping their employees take ownership of their finances by encouraging them to take an active role, ask questions and ultimately take accountability for their financial future.”

Charles Schwab’s Workplace Financial Wellness white paper can be accessed at Schwab.com.

«