End Of The Road For Defined Benefit Plans? Not Quite

While the vast majority of DB plans are frozen, plan sponsors are keeping all options on the table for participants.

When talking about defined benefit plans, it’s mostly in the context of how plan assets are being managed with the understanding that the vast majority of these plans are closed to new participants, and plan sponsors are probably considering a risk transfer or lump-sum payouts at some point in the future. But are defined benefit plans truly a thing of the past?

Not entirely, says Emily Hylton, an Atlanta-based senior vice president and investment consultant at Callan. Some employers are still offering defined benefit plans as a means of attracting and retaining talent. Others have shifted to cash balance plans, a type of defined benefit plan that defines the promised benefit in terms of a stated account balance.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Offering defined benefit plans can be a boon for companies that want to attract talent and are willing to take on long-term obligations. In a survey of both Millennials and Baby Boomers, the National Institute on Retirement Security found that the majority of respondents from both groups believe having a pension is important and said they would stay at a job that offered such a benefit. That finding is notable, given that Millennials entered the workforce at a time when pensions were not typically offered. The data suggest that plan participants understand the need for and desire lifetime income but are not totally sure how to achieve that on their own.

“I think what we’re seeing is a recognition that the current system doesn’t work that well,” explains John Lowell, an Atlanta-based partner in retirement consultant October Three. “Even within older age groups that might still have a defined benefit, those participants are working longer and/or may not be able to retire for a whole host of reasons. The first age group that was defined-contribution-only is also now nearing retirement, and many of them are faced with the same issue: Account balances aren’t enough, and when they look at annuities, for example, the lifetime income offered is much less than they anticipated it would be.”

Curves ahead

These dynamics put plan sponsors in a tricky position. Currently, closed defined benefit plans will still be paying out benefits to participants for many decades to come and are unlikely to be reopened. Retirement consultants say plan sponsors are hesitant to take on new long-term obligations because of the associated cost and regulatory hassles . But plan sponsors may end up with a different set of headaches by focusing just on defined contribution plans. Older employees may choose to stay in positions longer, which could limit new hiring opportunities. Younger employees may feel less loyalty to employers if there is no long-term benefit to staying in a role.

There are also issues with sunsetting existing defined benefit plans. Pension risk transfer, liability-driven investing and lump-sum payouts are all tools plan sponsors can use, but each requires certain funded status and often takes a significant amount of time to implement.

“There are trillions of dollars in defined benefit plans right now, and even coming off a big year for pension risk transfer, that solution only represents about 3% of the market,” explains Ari Jacobs, a senior partner in and the global retirement solutions leader at Aon. “I don’t think you can say all defined benefit plans are eventually going to end at a risk transfer. There are too many factors at play, and the plan sponsors we are working with are leaving all options on the table. The other thing to remember is: Each plan is unique, and plan needs will change over time, so we’re seeing plan sponsors try to be as flexible as they can.”

Lifetime income

Arguably, the chief advantage of a defined benefit plan is lifetime income. Whether that income is delivered through the plan itself or eventually through an annuity, the predictability gives participants peace of mind.

However, offering participants lifetime income in defined benefit plans that have lower coverage can be challenging. Risk transfers or lump-sum payouts may solve the equation for plan sponsors, but they can create a new set of issues for plan participants. October Three’s Lowell notes that annuities have a bad reputation with many participants, and lump-sum payouts put participants that were in defined benefit plans in the unique position of having to create a fixed income for themselves, similar to participants in a defined contribution plan.

Hylton notes plan sponsors are faced with a bit of a conundrum.

“I don’t think there’s an appetite to reopen a lot of these plans, but there is a greater recognition that something needs to be done in terms of lifetime income,” she says.

Matt McDaniel, a partner in and the U.S. pension strategies and solutions leader at Mercer, agrees.

“I don’t want to go so far as to say we’re at an inflection point,” he says. “But there are questions about long-term obligations, and we’re also getting data from the first generation of workers that were defined-contribution-only showing that the account balances really aren’t sufficient enough to retire with. As more people retire and that problem grows, I think we could see the tide start to shift back toward something that looks more like defined benefits, but it’s hard to say what that ultimately looks like.”

SECURE 2.0 and the Future

Provisions in the recently passed SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 seemed to pick up on this dynamic. Lowell notes that cash balance plan-focused provisions fix some of the tax and regulatory hurdles that have kept plan sponsors from offering cash balance plans in the past.

“These provisions haven’t gotten the same attention as others in the [law], but they are important,” he says. “They give plan sponsors the option to do a market-based rate of return such that the assets and liabilities are moving together without the kind of volatility we have seen in the past. That makes it easier for CFOs to model these plans, and when you have cost stability, that makes it more palatable to plan sponsors.”

Other provisions in the law will make it easier for plan sponsors to offer annuities and synthetic annuities to plan participants. Although work may yet need to be done to overcome the hesitancy that plan participants have about adopting annuities, consultants say.

Looking ahead, these provisions offer a base from which plan sponsors can continue to make refinements based on feedback from participants. Mercer’s McDaniel says that rates of product adoption typically determine which solution set becomes the most widely used.

“The retirement space tends to move incrementally,” he says. “If you look back 30 years ago when defined benefit pension plans were common, there wasn’t one single moment when the whole industry shifted to defined contribution. It was an accumulation of changes over time. I think plan sponsors are going to continue to weigh their options and get feedback from participants, and we’ll see more incremental change. So it’s possible we could look up 10 or 15 years from now and things are very different, but it won’t be one moment where everything shifts back to defined benefit. It’s more likely that we end up with something that looks like more of a mix of defined benefit and defined contribution features.”

 

Personalized Communications Key to Companies’ Attempts to Educate on Participants on Wider Range of Benefits

Plan sponsors are tailoring strategies to help employees get what they need from financial wellness offerings.

In September, every Delta Air Lines employee received a personal message in the mail outlining their own individual retirement readiness.

 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

That snapshot included an explanation of the model that Fidelity Investments, the recordkeeper, uses to gauge personal progress. It involved comparing each individual’s balance and age to a figure that expanded, for instance, from one times the employee’s current salary for a 30-year-old, to 10 times salary for a 67-year-old, with various targets at milestones in between.

 

“The statements displayed individuals’ current balance and what the target balance is for their age,” according to Josh Jessup, manager for global retirement, financial wellbeing and mobility at Delta. “If their balance was below the target, the statements provided suggestions to get closer to the target; if above, [they] made suggestions to continue or even enhance their success.”

 

Such a personalized approach is just one component of an increasingly tailored communication strategy many companies, such as Delta, are adopting to spark greater interest among their employees in retirement planning. Plan sponsors and the consultants who assist them have new tools and methods to identify a range of different needs among their retirement plan participants that might vary by generation, retirement timing and even personal finance goals.

 

It marks a major change for some. Five years ago, all Delta employees received identical messages about their retirement plans. But today, Jessup, who is based in Atlanta, says the company can address a new range of needs across the company’s workforce.

 

“This is part of a broader effort to make employees more aware of how ready for retirement they are, based on their age and current 401(k) balance—understanding that is the first step to begin to take action,” Jessup says. “We have much more insight to send messaging that is relevant to the participants now. Now we can be much more intentional to meet more diverse needs.”

 

Making Far-Off Goals More Urgent

 

Recognizing the variety of different questions, goals and needs employees have is a key part of engaging retirement plan participants for Kelli B. Send, co-founder and senior vice president of participant services with Francis Investment Counsel LLC. Send, based in Milwaukee, says she sees employee groups’ interests divide depending on where they fall in their so-called ‘lifecycle.’ Those who are younger and just getting started are often interested in budgeting and emergency funds. But those who are older are typically juggling multiple needs saving for anything from retirement to kids’ college funds, while those approaching retirement want to know if they are ready to do so.

 

“Given that those are really different conversations and to-do lists, if you are looking to reach each of those different audiences, it goes back to, ideally, texting them and messaging them,” Send says. She emphasized that the chief concern should be bringing each person’s specific goals to the forefront of the conversation by asking: “How do you make that urgent?” she says.

 

Increasingly, Megan Yost, senior vice president and engagement strategist with Segal Benz, also finds the messaging that resonates most with employees depends on their life stage and current priorities. If an employee is still grappling with paying off student loan debt, for example, a communication focused solely on retirement may not capture their attention unless it also promotes student-debt related benefits, according to Yost, based in Boston.

 

“There’s been a huge proliferation in the benefits that are available to employees,” Yost says. “Organizations are really focused on trying to help people take advantage of those programs and appreciate them so if they can help individuals or cohorts of individuals better understand what’s relevant to them, it helps them realize these benefits are something that helps them in their everyday lives.”

 

When employees have a better understanding of how their benefits can support them, such as when to tap an emergency savings program or how to plan ahead for paying medical expenses with a health savings account, it can indirectly boost employees’ retirement planning, Yost says.

 

“A lot of people are most engaged around their benefits when they’re experiencing a transition or a personal change,” Yost said. “A lot of our clients have segmented content that you can fill in different scenarios and people can navigate to the content that’s relevant to them.”

 

Meeting Clients on Their Terms

 

Finding the best way to reach people who are most interested in specific topics may also depend on what their day-to-day job entails, Yost says. Some Segal Benz clients have a workforce with limited access to computers during the day. Reaching them may mean hanging posters in break rooms or locker rooms and including a QR code that employees can quickly scan with their cell phone to access information, Yost says. Direct communication is also effective when managers emphasize a key benefit, such as introducing an emergency savings program, during a morning meeting, Yost says.

 

“You really want to think about where your people are: Are they driving trucks? Are they sitting behind a desk? Are they in a manufacturing plant?” Yost says. “Then find ways to get that information to those individuals.”

 

Jessup also sees the need to vary messaging depending on the type of job each Delta employee has. For example, reservation and general office employees work at desks and have good access to computers, making email updates the ideal way to reach them, he says. But the company has better success employing face-to-face communication with flight attendants and airport customer service employees.

 

“Because of these differences and many more differences even within working groups, we leverage multiple channels such as email, internal social media, intranet pages, message boards throughout the operation and various face-to-face avenues to try to reach as broad a population as possible,” Jessup says.

 

Tracking the Process

 

Delta also uses different methods to measure whether the communication is reaching the employees it needs to, Jessup says. For example, Delta tracks open and click-through rates for emails, as well as web page views on intranet and social media sites, he says. But Jessup does not measure success solely by how widespread a particular campaign’s reach is.

 

“We don’t really look at any of our options as less effective, but rather as reaching an additional segment— if a communication type is reaching a small population that isn’t being reached by other means, it is a success,” Jessup says. “At the end of the day, our real measure of success is how we move the needle on metrics such as our participation in programs, positive actions in those programs and employee feedback through surveys and other means.”

 

Employee surveys have been an important part of understanding what is top of mind among the workforce at Organon & Co. in Jersey City, New Jersey. Organon faced an unusual dynamic as a newly formed company when it spun off from Merck & Co. Inc. in 2021, according to Natalia Sandoval, a senior benefits specialist in retirement focused on the U.S. and Puerto Rico.

 

“With Organon being a new company, we didn’t have a lot of data to go back and say, ‘This is working,’ or, ‘This isn’t working,’” Sandoval says.

 

Armed with information from surveys and following an ongoing educational communications campaign on retirement, including and webinars, Sandoval is now planning targeted communications and the chance to expand on different topics as the firm continues to gather data and feedback from employees, she says.

 

“We are constantly evaluating our communications approach to drive engagement,” Sandoval says.

 

The survey results also revealed a generational divide in participants’ financial focus. Younger generations were interested in financial wellness and topics like budgeting and coping with student debt, and they wanted answers to questions such as, “How can I be more investment-savvy and make the most of my retirement?” Sandoval says, adding that younger workers showed greater interest in checking in via apps and getting information 24/7.  Those closer to retirement want to know, “Do I have enough for my retirement, and how can I consolidate my money under one account?”

 

“We’re doing different things and we’re hoping to attract different groups,” Sandoval says. “Unfortunately, we don’t have enough data to do targeted communications, but as the company continues to grow, we will have more access and more information.”

 

Improving the User Experience

 

The Organon benefits team also relies on employee resource groups, which can help focus information on specific retirement plan features like loans or early retirement distributions and retirement contributions.

 

“The ERGs are great channels to gather feedback from employees around any topics or to promote new benefits,” Sandoval says.

 

Sandoval is also watching how other plan sponsors and plan administrators integrate financial wellness and react to the Secure 2.0 Act of 2022. There is a big opportunity to improve and integrate the user experience in recordkeeping and financial wellness services for participants, she says.

 

“This topic will have a significant impact on employees’ financial journeys and most likely will be key to a more digitized retirement space offering a more tailored and holistic approach, including financial advice, planning and coaching services to employees,” Sandoval says.

 

For Send, the most personal approach also involves working with a personal money coach or financial planner.

 

“Money is a topic that participants can easily not engage in: We like to avoid it, there’s never enough of it, maybe our parents fought about it, we don’t learn about it in schools,” she says. “It’s the whole idea of having someone walk alongside them and hold them accountable.”

 

«