Inequality Worse for Social Security Than Low Birthrates, Chief Actuary Says

Stephen Goss said that income growth beyond the wage cap on payroll taxes was not anticipated during the reforms of the 1980s.

Stephen Goss, the chief actuary of the Social Security Administration, argued that economic setbacks and income inequality were the primary drivers of Social Security’s cash flow deficit.

In remarks made at the 2023 Harkin Retirement Security Symposium, hosted by the Harkin Institute, Goss said Social Security is currently projected to become insolvent in 2034. At that time, benefits will be cut to about 80% “of what is necessary to continue paying full benefits.”  

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

If left unaddressed, this cliff could dramatically compromise the financial well-being for many retirees and the retirement planning for workers, according to Goss.

The prevailing narrative on Social Security’s precarity is that it is due to declining birth rates, Goss noted. He then explained that 1980s Social Security reforms, which raised the retirement age, reduced benefits for certain workers receiving public sector pensions and made Social Security earnings taxable, actually anticipated declining birth rates. Costs in the main Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund have exceeded the program’s income including interest since 2021, and about “80% of the shortfall comes from unanticipated economic setbacks,” Goss explained, not from declining birth rates.

These setbacks are the combination of the Great Recession and what he called “dispersion of earnings,” or the concentration of total U.S. wage growth among those earning more than the cap on Social Security taxable income, set at $160,200 for 2023.

Goss explained that “average earnings increased more than expected, but real growth was 62% for the top 6% of workers, while only 17% for the lower 94% of workers” since the 1983 amendments to Social Security were made. This “reduced the share of earnings subject to [the Social Security] payroll tax.”

Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, shared this sentiment later at the conference. Richtman recommended that Congress explore taxing investment income at the same level as wages and/or lifting the cap on wages subject to payroll tax, both of which were also suggested by Goss.

The Social Security Expansion Act, sponsored by Senators Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, and Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachusetts, in February, would create a 12.4% investment income tax on individuals making more than $200,000 to help fund Social Security. It would gradually lift the cap on wages subject to payroll tax until the cap would be fully removed in 2035.

The bill is the only Social Security reform bill proposed this Congress that would keep Social Security solvent for 75 years, according to Goss’s office. Since the bill raises revenue, it must begin in the House of Representatives. It was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means on February 14 and has not advanced since.

US Corporate Pension Funding Levels Dropped in August

The drop in global equities led to the first overall decline 2023.

U.S. corporate pension funding levels fell last month, matching a drop in global equities, according to analysts.

The August report from LGIM America’s Pension Solutions Monitor estimated that the average U.S. corporate funding ratio decreased to 103.6% through August from 104.9% at the end of July.

Global equities declined 2.8%, with the S&P 500 decreasing 1.6%. Portfolios in plans with a 50/50 allocation declined 2.5%, while liabilities declined 1.4%. The decrease in assets outpaced the decline in liabilities, leading to lower funding ratios.

This is the first decline in corporate pension funding since December 2022 according to LGIM America data, which has seen funding ratios increasing from 98.3% at the end of last year and from 96% last August.

Insight Investment also reported that funding status fell in August, to 106.5% from 106.9% a month earlier. Insight Investment also reported asset and liability declines of 1.6% and 1.3%, respectively.

Sweta Vaidya, head of North American solution design at Insight Investment, noted in a statement that, “unlike last month, equity returns were weak and dragged down funding status even as discount rates increased 15 [basis points]. It is a gentle reminder that equity volatility can easily undo any potential funded status gains from discount rates rising—important to keep in mind as the fed provides mixed signals on whether it will hike rates another 25 bps or stay the course.”

Despite the trend of declining funding levels, Mercer found that pension funding increased in August. Mercer analysts reported the S&P 1500 pension funding status increased by one percentage point to a 108% funding ratio. Discount rates increased to 5.37% from 5.19%.

“With higher discount rates and improved funding for many defined benefit sponsors, we continue to see a lot of activity, with plan sponsors taking a fresh look at strategy and in many cases executing pension risk transfer and investment de-risking strategies,” Mercer partner Scott Jarboe said in the company’s report.

Mercer representatives did not respond to requests for further detail about the firm’s analysis.

Aon’s model found pension funding levels decreased to 101.5% by the end of August from 101.7% at the end of July. Assets declined 1.7%, and credit spreads widened by 6 bps. The month-end 10-year Treasury rate increased 12 bps. The interest rates used to value pension liabilities increased to 5.32%. from 5.14%.

The WTW Pension Index also declined in August due to weak equities, along with a decline in liabilities as a result of interest rate hikes. WTW’s model tracks the hypothetical performance of a portfolio with a 60/40 ratio of equity to fixed income. The equity portion returned negative 2.4% for the month, with the fixed-income portion returning negative 05%.

Agilis reported in its U.S. pension briefing that liabilities decreased between 1% and 2% last month, as both equities and fixed income had negative returns. Negative returns in equities outweighed the 0.18% rise in discount rates, which now sit at 5.18%.

According to October Three’s pension finance update, a hypothetical plan with a 60/40 asset allocation lost 2% in August but remained up 9% for the year. A plan with a 20/80 asset allocation also lost 2% in August but is up 3% for the year. October Three noted while it was not a good month for equities, 2023 is shaping up to be a good year for pension sponsors.

Wilshire Associates pension funding tracker found that corporate pension funding fell 0.1% in August, to 105.0%. Wilshire attributed the decline to a 2.3% decline in asset values, offset by a 2.1% decline in liabilities.

“After four consecutive months of funded status increases, August experienced a slight decrease,” Ned McGuire, a managing director at Wilshire, said in a release. “Despite the decrease in most asset classes—with international equity experiencing the worst monthly decrease since September 2022—the liability value also decreased due to rising yields.”

Milliman reported pension funding for the 100 largest U.S. corporate pension funds declined to 103.3% from 103.6% in August. Asset value declined 1.55%, to $1.327 trillion from $1.354 trillion during the month. Milliman projected the funding ratio for corporate plans will rise back to 103.6% by the end of the year and could reach 105.2% if asset return rates and discount rates are stable at 5.8% and 5.41%, respectively.

In a scenario with interest rates rising to 6.24% from 5.61% by the end of 2024, with a 9.8% return on investments, funding ratios would climb to 107% by the end of the year and 120% by the end of 2024, Milliman projected. If discount rates decline to 5.21% by year-end 2023 and 4.61% by year-end 2024 with annual returns of 1.8%, the 2023 funding ratio would decline to 100%, and the 2024 ratio would fall to 91%.

«