Internal Managers Trump outside Pension Advisors

March 6, 2002 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - Pension funds with on-staff advisors end up with better investment results than those who outsource their asset management tasks, a UK study found.

The study of 28 internally managed funds managing £158 billion pounds showed that the funds enjoyed lower risks, which resulted in higher average total returns. The study was undertaken by WM Company, a research firm.

According to WM, the majority of the internal funds actively manage their UK equities. The funds produced a 0.3% average annual return over rolling three and five-year periods.
 
Similar results apply for North American stocks, while European equities turned in a 0.2% average annual gain, again showing a “significantly lower dispersion of returns”, according to WM. The only area where outside managers triumphed was with Japan equities and UK bonds.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

The funds held an average 212 UK stocks – much more than the average portfolio managed outside, WM said.

Lower Turnover Means Lower Cost

But the internal funds’ activity was much lower. Average portfolio turnover was 31% for internal UK equities, compared with 53% externally. For European equities the ratios were 74% versus 85%. For UK bonds the internal rate of change was at 82% compared with 141% for external.

WM said the lower portfolio turnover gives internally managed funds a strong advantage due to their lower cost base, it notes.

WM also point out that internal funds have a lower risk profile with an average tracking annual error of 1.6%, which is equivalent to the 75th percentile for external funds. This puts internal funds in the lowest quartile of riskiness.

Funds involved in the study represent a quarter of the UK pension market, compared with 46% 15 years ago. In 80% of these funds, six out of 10 members are either inactive workers or pensioners.

«