Investment Product and Service Launches

Capital Group adopts PFaroe; Reliance Trust chooses Northern Trust to support CITs; Vanguard introduces low-cost ESG ETFs; and more.

Capital Group Adopts PFaroe

Capital Group has adopted PFaroe to assist defined benefit (DB) pension clients in enhancing pension risk management decision making and promoting practical investment solutions suitable to each plan’s liabilities.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

According to Capital Group, the LDI Solutions team will leverage PFaroe’s asset-liability modeling tools and its reporting platform to work more collaboratively with clients and prospects; demonstrating key findings efficiently, deepening engagement and generating a greater understanding of risk to drive informed strategic asset allocation decisions.

Gary Veerman, head of LDI Solutions, Capital Group, says, “Ten years ago, you could be a credible LDI player by just having a successful investment product suite. Today, I view being able to deliver analytical capabilities, asset allocation expertise and a more consultative mind frame a necessity to being truly successful in the pensions space and an elite LDI manager. I envision PFaroe being a key component to growing our business and really taking our LDI reporting and analysis to the next level.”

He adds: “PFaroe gives us a scalable way to provide the asset allocation perspective that plan sponsors need to be evaluating. That is potentially the most important aspect of the conversation you have with a client or prospect, as opposed to telling them you have a good investment suite.”

Matthew Seymour, CEO of RiskFirst, says, “Capital Group has built a very strong reputation in the LDI market and we are extremely pleased that they have chosen PFaroe to help fuel their business growth and strengthen their client partnerships. Through its advanced analytical properties and its widespread presence in the market, PFaroe is a tool proven to be a real facilitator of collaboration and a means of promoting understanding and strategy optimization – and this is all the more important in this increasingly complex market.”

PGIM Lengthens ETF Space with Second Actively Managed Fund  

PGIM Investments launched its second actively managed exchange-traded fund (ETF), the PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF, as it continues to expand the ETF platform created earlier this year.

“Having the benefit of scale has provided us the flexibility to expand our platform and thoughtfully develop strategies in a variety of vehicles that meet client demand,” says Stuart Parker, president and CEO of PGIM Investments. “When it comes to ETFs, our focus is on developing competitive products that align with our core investment capabilities.

PGIM Investments’ first ETF, the PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (NYSE Arca: PULS), was launched in April. Just like PULS, the PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) is also actively managed by sub-adviser PGIM Fixed Income. PHYL is priced at 0.53%, 14 basis points below the average active high yield ETF, according to Morningstar as of August 31, 2018. The fund invests primarily in high yield bonds and seeks to generate total return through a combination of current income and capital appreciation.

“We see a lot of opportunity for an experienced active manager with a core capability in high yield bond investing,” says Parker. “Our investors couldn’t be in more capable hands—our portfolio management team has the experience, credit research, and risk management capabilities critical to investing in this sector.”

The PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF is managed by the same PGIM Fixed Income team that manages the 5-Star Overall Morningstar-rated PGIM High Yield Fund as of June 30, an actively managed open-end fund that has also earned Morningstar’s Gold Analyst rating as of July 23. 

Reliance Trust Chooses Northern Trust to Support CITs

Northern Trust has been selected by Reliance Trust, an FIS company, to provide global custody, fund administration and fund accounting services for collective investment trust (CIT) funds, expanding a key relationship in its growing CIT fund services business. 

“We are excited to build on our relationship with Reliance Trust,” says Dan Houlihan, head of Asset Servicing, Americas at Northern Trust. “Our platform is structured to offer fund managers an end-to-end solution that combines Reliance Trust’s expertise and scale as a trustee with Northern Trust’s global operations technology, financial strength and decades of experience supporting CITs and other fund structures.” 

CITs continue to grow in popularity as a fund structure for tax-exempt U.S. retirement plans and other qualified investors. Because CITs are not sold directly to retail investors, they are subject to different regulatory oversight and typically have a lower cost structure than mutual funds.

Under the agreement, Northern Trust provides services for 21 Reliance funds with approximately $7.7 billion in assets under advisement. Northern Trust’s CIT business grew by approximately 41 percent in assets under administration during the 12 months, ending June 30.

Vanguard Introduces Low-Cost ESG ETFs

Vanguard added to its current environmental, social, and governance (ESG) fund offering with Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX).

The new exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can be purchased commission-free from Vanguard and are available on other leading trading platforms.

“Vanguard’s new ETFs can serve as core components of a portfolio for individuals, institutions, and advisers who wish to invest in broadly-diversified, low-cost ETFs screened for certain ESG criteria,” says Matthew Brancato, head of Vanguard’s Portfolio Review Group. “At the same time, investors should recognize that funds with ESG screens may perform differently than the broad market due to the exclusion of stocks of certain companies.”

With estimated expense ratios of 0.12% for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF and 0.15% for Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF, these funds offer ESG-conscious investors low-cost access to a majority of U.S. and international equity markets. Covering more than 80% of the U.S. equity market capitalization and nearly 70% of the international equity market capitalization, the funds exclude companies involved in the production of alcohol, tobacco, gambling, adult entertainment, weapons, fossil fuels and nuclear power. The construction methodology also excludes companies that do not meet certain diversity criteria, as well as the labor, human rights, anti-corruption, and environmental standards defined by the U.N. Global Compact Principles.

Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF seeks to track the FTSE U.S. All Cap Choice Index, an ESG-screened, market-cap-weighted benchmark comprised of large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. stocks. Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF’s target benchmark is the FTSE Global All Cap ex U.S. Choice Index, an ESG-screened, market-cap-weighted benchmark comprised of large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks in developed and emerging international markets (excluding the U.S.).

Most Participants Welcome Retirement Savings Help From Plan Sponsors

Many participants see the match percentage as a suggestion for how much to save; the majority of participants support automatic plan features; and even participants who are hands-on with investing like TDFs, J.P. Morgan found.

Fifty-two percent of participants surveyed by J.P. Morgan expect to be able to retire at their ideal retirement age, and the same percentage somewhat or strongly agree that their savings will last throughout their lifetime, up from 41% and 44%, respectively in 2016.

 

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

However, despite the increase in confidence, only 40% are very or extremely confident they know how much to put into their defined contribution (DC) retirement plan to be on tract to reach their retirement goals. Only 39% are very or extremely confident in estimating how much they will have in their plan by retirement age if they continue investing at the same level, and only one-third (34%) expressed the same confidence in knowing how much monthly income their savings will provide in retirement.

 

Seventy-three percent of participants think they should be saving 10% or more to be on track for a secure retirement, but 70% are falling short on that savings target.

 

Guidance on saving

 

Nearly six in 10 respondents to the survey (58%) somewhat or strongly agree that their employer should provide a viewpoint on how much employees should contribute to their DC plans. Forty-four percent say employers should notify them if they are not saving enough, and 19% say employers should decide their savings rate on their behalf.

 

Asked to select the best way for an employer to motivate them to contribute more to their retirement plan and reach their retirement goals, 36% chose knowing the amount they should be contributing now from each paycheck—and how much more they need to save.

 

The survey finds that the employer match has a strong influence on participant deferral rates. Thirty percent view the percentage of salary matched as a contribution recommendation, and 19% interpret the percentage as what their employer “thinks they should be saving.” One-fifth (21%) set their 2017 deferral rate to what the employer will match.

 

Many plan features, some of which plan sponsors fear making, are supported by employees to help them achieve their retirement savings goals. For example, J.P. Morgan found 40% of participants agree that stretching the match from 100% of up to 6% of deferrals to 50% of up to 12% of deferrals would be most effective in helping encourage employees to save more.

 

According to previous J.P. Morgan research, one-quarter of plan sponsors are not implementing automatic enrollment due to fear of participant pushback; however, the new survey shows 82% of participants are in favor of or neutral toward automatic enrollment at a 6% default deferral rate. Likewise, the previous survey found 20% of plan sponsors are not implementing automatic deferral escalation due to fear of participant backlash, but 80% of respondents to the current survey are in favor of or neutral toward a 2% increase in deferrals each year until a 10% savings rate is reached.

 

J.P. Morgan found 62% of participants with both automatic features expect to be able to retire when they want versus 46% of those who were only automatically enrolled, and 80% of participants with both automatic features expect their savings to last throughout their lifetime versus 47% of those who were only automatically enrolled.

 

Guidance on investing

 

According to the survey findings, 60% of participants are “do-it-for-me” investors who prefer to leave investment decisions to investment professionals, while 40% want to take a more hands-on approach to investment decisions.

 

Yet, even these “do-it-yourself” investors lack some confidence in certain investment decisions. Only 37% of hands-on investors say they are very or extremely confident in which DC plan investment options they should choose, and only 44% say the same about how to adjust the way their plan assets are invested the closer they get to retirement. This compares to 32% and 35% of “do-it-for-me” investors, respectively.

 

Sixty-one percent of all participants surveyed agreed with the statement, “If I could push an ‘easy’ button for retirement and completely hand over my retirement planning and investing to a financial professional, I would.” Thirty-seven percent indicate that their employer has an obligation to help them pick the right investments in their DC plan, while 20% say their employer should decide their investment choices on their behalf.

 

The survey finds target-date funds (TDFs) are highly valued by participants: 88% find them appealing and, among those who say their employer offers TDFs, 71% are invested in them. Among “do-it-for-me” investors, 93% find them appealing and, when they are available in the plan, 81% invest in them.

 

However, even among “do it yourself” investors, 81% find TDFs appealing and, if they are offered in the plan, 54% invest in them.

 

In addition, fear of employee pushback was the most frequently cited reason for not conducting a re-enrollment among the 87% of plan sponsors who have not yet done so, yet 86% of participants (90% of “do-it-for-me” investors and 79% of “do-it-yourselfers”) are in favor of or at least neutral toward these strategies. Eighty-three percent of participants who went through a re-enrollment with a TDF as the qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) allowed their assets to be moved, and 99% of those who allowed their assets to be moved are satisfied.

 

More findings from the J.P. Morgan 2018 Defined Contribution Plan Participant Survey may be found here.

«