Investors Agree Guaranteed Income in Retirement Is Important

However, there is confusion about how to get this additional income stream.

According to the Wells Fargo/Gallup Investor and Retirement Optimism Index, asset owners are feeling about as optimistic today as they did back in September 2000, when the index set its as-yet-unbroken record high of +147.

The strong optimism for the third quarter stands despite real concern, only recently abated, that Congressional tax reform efforts might reduce or even eliminate tax incentives and favorable deferral rules for employer-sponsored retirement plans. According to the index results, three-quarters of non-retired investors in the survey have a 401(k) plan, and more than half (57%) say the most valued feature of their plan is the “match contribution from their employer.” The next most valued feature is the tax deferral on the money they contribute, which was noted by 33% of respondents.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“The 401(k) plan has evolved into the greatest savings and investment vehicle that Americans have today to steadily build a retirement nest egg,” says Fredrik Axsater, executive vice president and head of strategic business segments at Wells Fargo Asset Management. “Pre-tax savings has a direct impact on the level of savings that people achieve, and we have to recognize this as the country contemplates changes in tax policy.”

Forty-six percent say they would “save less” or “stop saving” in their 401(k) if the tax deferred status of their plan was taken away.

Confusion abounds over retirement income

One key finding from the index shows nearly all non-retired investors (98%) “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” that “it is important to have a guaranteed income stream in retirement, in addition to Social Security,” and yet, according to Axsater, there is confusion about how to get this additional income stream.

“Six in 10 either strongly agree or somewhat agree that they want a guaranteed monthly income stream that lasts as long as they need it, even if that means giving up access to some of their money,” he says. “But at the same time, 75% of non-retired investors either strongly agree or somewhat agree that they want the freedom to spend their money as they want in retirement, even if that means they may run out of money too soon.”

Investors also are unsure about what products are available to provide them with a guaranteed income throughout retirement. In addition, they are unsure how much money they would need to structure various levels of income for various amounts of time.

“Setting a retirement savings goal—even if it’s an estimate—is a critical step in the process of managing one’s retirement outcome, but it’s hard to do,” Axsater notes. “Further, it becomes even harder to try to estimate what one will harvest from savings each year of living in retirement. This is where our industry must come up with solutions that allow people to envision their savings needs and what that translates to in terms of annual draw down in retirement.”

Interest grows in social impact investing

Wells Fargo and Gallup researchers asked investors about their views on “social impact investing,” which was defined for respondents as “choosing investments based on the effect they have on things like the environment, human rights, diversity and other social values, in addition to investment returns.”

Women express more interest in investing in social impact investments, with 39% saying they are “very interested” or “somewhat interested,” as compared with 26% of male investors. The data shows younger investors appear more interested in this type of investing, with 39% of investors aged 18 to 49, “very interested” or “somewhat interested,” compared with 29% of investors age 50 and older.

Overall, 44% of non-retired investors with a 401(k) say they would “definitely” or “probably” put money in social impact investments if they had the option in their plan. Moreover, 34% of non-retired investors with a 401(k) say that including social impact investments as an option in a work-place retirement plan would make them feel “more positively” toward their employer. Of those non-retired investors who would feel more favorably about their employer, 53% are women and 47% are men.

In the Wells Fargo/Gallup survey, investors were asked to rate their interest in each of three specific social impact themes. Seventy-eight percent of investors say they are “very interested” or “somewhat interested” in protecting the environment, 76% are “very interested” or “somewhat interested” in doing social good—such as promoting diversity and improving education—and 74% are “very interested” or “somewhat interested” in focusing on responsible corporate governance, including “ethics” and “behaviors.”

Can Plan Compensation Definition Include Housing Allowance?

“I work for a denominational church entity where ministers can exclude a portion of their compensation from taxable income as parsonage (housing) allowance.

“We sponsor a 403(b) plan that provides employer contributions to these ministers. Can our plan’s definition of compensation include housing allowance, even though it is not taxable income to the minister? If so, are there any other restrictions/limitations that would affect our ability to make an employer contribution on compensation designated as housing allowance? We live in an area where the cost of housing is high, so some of these amounts designated as housing allowance are quite large.”

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

David Powell, with Groom Law Group, answers:

 

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has taken the position for a number of years that amounts nontaxable as housing allowance are not compensation for purposes of the 415 definition of compensation. Thus, they cannot be counted as compensation for purposes of the 100% of compensation limit. See Private Letter Ruling (PLR) 200135045. However, for purposes of making employer contributions, a different definition of compensation could be used that includes nontaxable housing allowance. Contributions must still satisfy the 415 limit based on the narrow definition excluding them, though. And the plan documents must so provide.

 

Note, too, that church plans often include a designation of plan distributions as eligible for housing allowance. As with the housing allowance in general, there must be a proper designation by the employing church. Old rulings address how this is done for denominational plans. See, for example, Rev. Rulings 75-22 and 63-156. Mere designation does not make the distribution per se nontaxable—it only makes it eligible. It is nontaxable only to the extent used to pay housing expenses, as to which there is a long history of what expenses qualify and what do not. Also, frequently, the full distribution will still be reported as taxable on the 1099-R for the distribution. If part of it is nontaxable because it is used for housing, the minister will typically deduct that above-the-line on line 16a and b of the minister’s Form 1040. Some denominational plans follow different reporting practices, however.

 

Keep in mind, too, though, that the subject of pension distributions as eligible for housing allowance has been a “no-ruling” area for the IRS, indicating they are re-thinking the old rulings where they said it applies to pensions, and there is ongoing litigation trying to hold the housing allowance in its entirety to be unconstitutional. So stay tuned.

 

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

 

 

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Rebecca.Moore@strategic-i.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.

«