IRS Clarifies SECURE Act Birth and Adoption Distribution Rules

Qualified birth or adoption distributions have been permissible since January under the SECURE Act, but more specific guidance on how they should be treated has only just been published by the IRS.

The IRS last week published a detailed Q&A style guidance document meant to help retirement plan industry practitioners understand and effectively implement key provisions in the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act. 

The guidance covers topics related to the legislation, such as allowing plan participation for long-term, part-time employees in 401(k) plans; the expansion of qualified birth or adoption distributions; and the timing of related plan amendments, among other areas.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

In response to the Q&A document, Barry Salkin and Livia Quan Aber, both ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act] specialist attorneys with the Wagner Law Group, drafted a client alert that dives into the little-discussed topic of qualified birth or adoption distributions, which are referred to as “QBOADs.” The pair explain that QBOADs have been permissible since January, but many employers have been waiting for specific IRS guidance on how these distributions would be implemented before making a decision as to whether to include them as a plan feature.

“A QBOAD is defined under the Internal Revenue Code [IRC] as any distribution of up to $5,000 from an applicable eligible retirement plan to an individual if made during the one-year period beginning on the date on which a child of the individual is born or the legal adoption of an eligible adoptee is finalized,” the attorneys say. “Each parent is entitled to receive a $5,000 distribution (not indexed for inflation) for the same child; if there are multiple births, each parent is entitled to receive a $5,000 distribution for each child.”

As is the case for other types of distributions enabled by the SECURE Act and other pieces of recent legislation, a plan administrator may rely on a “reasonable representation” from an individual that he or she is eligible for a QBOAD.

“This is the case unless the plan administrator has actual knowledge to the contrary,” the attorneys explain. “However, a plan administrator could request a copy of the birth or adoption certificate.”

According to the Wagner attorneys, an “eligible adoptee” in this context is “an individual who has not attained age 18 or is physically or mentally incapable of self-support, but excludes a child of the taxpayer’s spouse.”

“The [new IRS guidance] clarifies that the determination as to whether an individual is physically or mentally incapable of self-support is made in the same way as a determination whether an individual is disabled under Internal Revenue Code Section 72(m)(7),” the attorneys say. “Under that section, an individual is considered disabled if he or she is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determined physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinite duration.”

Similar to coronavirus-related distributions (CRDs), hardship withdrawals that were established more recently in response to the pandemic, an individual receiving a QBOAD may recontribute the money to an eligible retirement plan of which the individual is a beneficiary and to which a rollover can be made. To this end, the IRS guidance further indicates that the Treasury Department will issue regulations relating to these recontribution rules, including an issue not addressed in the SECURE Act, namely, the timing of recontributions. 

As the Wagner attorneys explain, a QBOAD is includible in an individual’s gross income but is not subject to the excise tax on premature distributions, and is also not treated as an eligible rollover distribution for purposes of the IRC’s direct rollover rules, the Section 402(f) notice or the mandatory 20% withholding requirement. It is, however, subject to voluntary withholding.

“An eligible plan is not required to permit QBOADS,” the attorneys add. “If it does, the plan must be amended by the last day of the 2022 plan year; if QBOADs are added after 2022, the plan must be amended by the last day of the plan year in which the QBOAD is implemented. … If an eligible retirement plan permits QBOADs, the plan must accept a recontribution from an individual if: (i) the individual received a QBOAD from that plan, and (ii) the individual is eligible to make a rollover contribution at the time he or she wishes to recontribute the QBOAD.”

According to the Wagner attorneys’ analysis, these facts suggest that an individual who has separated from service with the employer from whose plan he or she received a QBOAD will not be able to recontribute the QBOAD to that plan. However, they will presumably be able to recontribute it to an individual retirement account (IRA). Also of note, the attorneys say, is that even if an eligible plan does not include a QBOAD feature, an individual nevertheless can elect to treat a plan distribution as a QBOAD—which an individual will likely wish to do to avoid the 10% excise tax on premature distributions.

Options to Help Participants Avoid Tapping Into Retirement Savings

Plan sponsors can share with participants other options to consider before taking a DC plan loan or withdrawal.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act allows qualified individuals to take a loan or withdrawal of up to $100,000 from their defined contribution (DC) account, yet experts say DC plan participants should view this as a last resort.

Those affected by COVID-19—meaning those who have been diagnosed with COVID-19, have had a spouse or dependent fall ill as a result of the coronavirus or experienced adverse financial effects for a number of reasons—are eligible to take a coronavirus-related distribution (CRD) from their DC plan. The idea behind the enhanced distribution option was to provide a financial safety net to individuals with few options.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

However, retirement industry experts encourage individuals to weigh the pros and cons of taking CRDs from retirement savings accounts. Many experts say cons include the three-year time window participants have to pay back the distributions to avoid incurring taxes and any taxation should an individual fail to pay back the distribution.

It’s best to tap into other networks before applying for a loan or withdrawal, says Ben Lewis, head of institutional sales and consultant relations at TIAA. “We say, ‘Let’s go back to basics.’ Are there ways to reduce credit card debt, utility bills, mortgages or rent?” he asks. Making a temporary lifestyle change, such as selling a car or unneeded furniture, can help with day-to-day cash flow troubles, he adds.

Lewis says taking a retirement plan loan should be a last-case scenario. Participants who take a large loan can risk not meeting the payback period, and many participants are already underfunded in their retirement programs, he says.

Individuals can instead source cash through a home equity loan, adds Mark Charnet, founder and CEO of American Prosperity Group. With such a loan, homeowners can borrow up to $100,000—the same as the CARES Act limit—and pay it back within 15 to 20 years with no major tax hit. Charnet recommends individuals look into lending from their local bank, as a bank in an individual’s state and region could be more likely to lend the money and it could result in a better value.

Similarly to using a home equity loan, homeowners can also refinance their home, Charnet says. Individuals who choose to refinance their loan can pay it back within 30 years at a lower interest rate than the one on the current mortgage. Homeowners can also choose a 15- to 20-year mortgage if they’re looking for a shorter payback period.

If an individual is not a homeowner but is still working, he may be able to get a loan from his employer or take a loan against his life insurance. Taking a loan from an employer often requires an employee to have good standing and other requirements, and individuals should check with their employer about specifics. In this scenario, employees could likely pay back the loan via a salary reduction, Charnet says.

Borrowing against a life insurance policy also may be a good alternative for those in urgent need of cash, Charnet says. Individuals can repay their life insurance loan on their own schedule and these loans will typically have low interest rates. However, an individual will need to have enough cash value in their policy for them to borrow. This may not be available for some participants, depending on how long they’ve had the policy.

Lewis and Charnet say these resources may not be realistic for some, depending on their employment status. Obtaining a home equity loan, for example, may prove more difficult for those who have lost their job, Charnet says. “It’s not an easy spot if you don’t have something to sell or equity to tap into,” he says.

Aside from selling unused items, individuals can free up some cash by reducing student loan debt payments and/or credit card debt payments. “It’s looking around and seeing where those opportunities are to pause, stop or defer debt payments, or take withdrawals separate and distinct from the retirement program,” Lewis says.

Through the CARES Act, individuals are allowed to suspend monthly student loan payments without penalty. Acting on President Donald Trump’s presidential memorandum signed August 8, U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos directed Federal Student Aid (FSA) to extend this student loan relief to borrowers through December 31. However, as Congress has reached a standstill on a new relief program, individuals who use this feature will need to go back to paying their loans after December 31.

Charnet also says that before taking a DC plan withdrawal, depending on how much money they need, individuals can look into possibly working a part-time job. This is more of a long-term plan, as it won’t generate a large sum of money instantly, and employers may be more reluctant to hire right now amid the pandemic and soaring unemployment numbers. But, if time isn’t critical, it can mean extra cash for those who need it for a medical bill or loan, Charnet says. “While it may not solve their immediate need, for something with a long time frame, they can certainly pay it back by earning a small income,” he says.

«