December 20, 2006 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - The Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) has devoted a Web page to information
relating to the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA),
including links to a chart of PPA provisions, published
guidance on certain provisions, and newsletter
articles.
Notice 2006-105 – providing procedures for
electing an alternative deficit reduction
contribution for airline employers given an extension
of the election by the Pension Protection Act of 2006
(See
IRS Provides Details for Airline
Relief
),
Notice 2006-89 – providing transition relief
for plans of Indian tribal governments to comply with
changes made under section 906 of the PPA,
Notice 2006-75 – extending the use of the
corporate bond weighted average interest rate under
section 301 of the PPA, and
Announcement 2006-70 – describing an
alternative funding schedule and providing a form to
make an election under section 402 of the Pension
Protection Act of 2006.
Users of the Web page can also use links to
information on the PPA posted on the White House and
Department of Labor Web sites.
A few years back—when my kids still believed in the
reality of Santa Claus—we discovered an ingenious Web site
that purported to offer a real-time assessment of their
"naughty or nice" status.
Now, as Christmas approached, it was not uncommon for
us to caution our occasionally misbehaving brood that they
had best be attentive to how those actions might be viewed
by the big guy at the North Pole.
But nothing ever had the impact of that Web site –
if not on their behaviors (they’re kids, after all),
then certainly on the level of their concern about the
consequences.
In fact, in one of his final years as a
“believer,” my son (who, it must be acknowledged,
had been PARTICULARLY naughty) was on the verge of tears,
worried that he’d find nothing under the Christmas tree
but the coal and bundle of switches he surely deserved.
One might plausibly argue that many participants act
as though some kind of benevolent elf will drop down their
chimney with a bag full of cold cash from the North
Pole.
They behave as though, somehow, their bad savings
behaviors throughout the year(s) notwithstanding,
they’ll be able to pull the wool over the eyes of a
myopic, portly gentleman in a red snow suit.
Not that they actually believe in a retirement version of
St. Nick, but that’s essentially how they behave, even
though, like my son, a growing number evidence concern
about the consequences of their “naughty”
behaviors.
Also, like my son, they tend to worry about it too late to
influence the outcome—and don’t change their behaviors in
any meaningful way.
Ultimately, the volume of presents under our
Christmas tree never really had anything to do with our
kids’ behavior, of course.
As parents, we nurtured their belief in Santa Claus
as long as we thought we could (without subjecting them to
the ridicule of their classmates), not because we expected
it to modify their behavior (though we hoped, from time to
time), but because, IMHO, kids should have a chance to
believe, if only for a little while, in those kinds of
possibilities.
We all live in a world of possibilities, of
course.
But as adults we realize—or should realize—that
those possibilities are frequently bounded in by the
reality of our behaviors.
This is a season of giving, of coming together, of sharing
with others.
However, it is also a time of year when we should all be
making a list and checking it twice—taking note, and making
changes to what is naughty and nice about our savings
behaviors.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus—but he looks
a lot like you, assisted by “helpers” like the
employer match, your financial adviser, investment
markets, and tax incentives.
Happy Holidays!
P.S. 2007 Update:
The Naughty or Nice site is still online (though
they’re undergoing some construction, and some things
don’t always work as they should) at
http://www.claus.com/naughtyornice/index.php.htm