IRS Proposes Allowing HRA Reimbursement for Direct Primary Care Arrangements

The IRS also identifies limited circumstances for which an employee with a DPC arrangement could contribute to an HSA.

The IRS released proposed regulations relating to Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) regarding the treatment of amounts paid for certain medical care arrangements, including direct primary care (DCP) arrangements, health care sharing ministries (HCSM) and certain government-sponsored health care programs. The proposed regulations affect individuals who pay for these arrangements or programs and want to deduct the amounts paid as medical expenses under Section 213.

In the proposal, the IRS states that payments for DPC arrangements and for membership in an HCSM are expenses for medical care under Section 213 of the Code. Because these payments are for medical care, a health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) provided by an employer generally may reimburse an employee for DPC arrangement and HCSM membership payments.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Addressing health savings accounts (HSAs), the IRS notes that Section 223 permits eligible individuals to establish and contribute to HSAs. The legislative history to Section 223 states that “eligible individuals for HSAs are individuals who are covered by a high-deductible health plan [HDHP] and no other health plan that is not [an HDHP].” The legislative history also states that, “an individual with other coverage in addition to a high-deductible health plan is still eligible for an HSA if such other coverage is certain permitted insurance or permitted coverage.” The IRS explains that if an individual has coverage that is not disregarded coverage or preventive care, and that provides benefits before the minimum annual deductible is met, the individual is not an eligible individual.

The IRS says it understands that DPC arrangements typically provide for an array of primary care services and items, such as physical examinations, vaccinations, urgent care, laboratory testing and the diagnosis and treatment of sickness or injuries. This type of DPC arrangement would constitute a health plan or insurance that provides coverage before the minimum annual deductible is met, and provides coverage that is not disregarded coverage or preventive care. Therefore, an individual generally is not eligible to contribute to an HSA if that individual is covered by a DPC arrangement.

However, in the limited circumstances in which an individual is covered by a DPC arrangement that does not provide coverage under a health plan or insurance (for example, the arrangement solely provides for an anticipated course of specified treatments of an identified condition) or solely provides for disregarded coverage or preventive care—for example, it solely provides for an annual physical examination—the individual would not be precluded from contributing to an HSA solely due to participation in the DPC arrangement.

If the DPC arrangement fee is paid by an employer, that payment arrangement would be a group health plan and it would disqualify the individual from contributing to an HSA.

The proposed regulations will be published in the Federal Register on June 10.

Loan Repayments for Employees Furloughed Before CARES Act Relief Period

Experts from Groom Law Group and Cammack Retirement Group answer questions concerning retirement plan administration and regulations.

“I understand that loan repayments with due dates between March 27 and December 31 can be delayed for one year under the CARES Act. But what about payments that were due on or before March 27? We had some people that we furloughed prior to that date, and some of them have not made those payments.”

Stacey Bradford, Kimberly Boberg, David Levine and David Powell, with Groom Law Group, and Michael A. Webb, vice president, Retirement Plan Services, Cammack Retirement Group, answer:

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Unfortunately, loan repayments due on or prior to March 27 are not clearly delayed by one year. Pending additional guidance, they would likely be subject to the rules of your plan/loan policy as to when such payments would be considered to be in default and treated as a deemed distribution. See our prior Ask the Experts column as to when a loan is considered to be in default for details on these provisions. Note that IRS Notice 2020-23 would provide limited relief for those payments where the cure period falls between April 1 and July 14. In such case, the end of the cure period could be delayed to July 15.

There is some relief under the CARES Act for the participants in your situation. Since your employees have been furloughed, they would appear to be “qualified individuals” for purposes of the CARES Act favorable tax treatment for COVID-19 related distributions. Thus, if they are younger than 59 1/2, the 10% premature distribution penalty would be waived for any deemed distribution that occurs prior to December 31, the tax liability could be spread out evenly over three tax years, and taxes could be avoided entirely if the participants repay the deemed distribution to the plan within three years (if the plan permits). Note that a participant could claim this relief even if the plan does not adopt the CARES Act provisions regarding distributions and/or loans. Finally, as with all CARES Act questions, keep in mind that the IRS is continuing to issue more guidance, so stay tuned.

 

NOTE: This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice.

Do YOU have a question for the Experts? If so, we would love to hear from you! Simply forward your question to Rebecca.Moore@issgovernance.com with Subject: Ask the Experts, and the Experts will do their best to answer your question in a future Ask the Experts column.

«