IRS Updates Procedures for Determination Letter Requests

Procedures for requesting determination letters were modified to reflect the elimination of the five-year remedial amendment cycles for individually designed plans.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued Revenue Procedure 2017-4 explaining how the IRS provides advice to taxpayers on issues under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements Office. It also details the types of advice available to taxpayers, and the manner in which such advice is requested and provided.

Procedures for requesting determination letters were modified to reflect the elimination of the five-year remedial amendment cycles for individually designed plans and other changes as described in section 4 of Rev. Proc. 2016–37. To the extent that employers that maintain individually designed plans may still request a determination letter under the third Cycle A, the procedures described in sections 6 and 7 of Rev. Proc. 2016–6 continue to apply.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

Rev. Proc. 2016-37 says a plan can request a determination letter only if any of these apply:

  • It has never received a letter before;
  • The plan is terminating; or
  • The IRS makes a special exception. IRS anticipates making exceptions based on program capacity to work on additional applications, and the need for rulings in certain areas. The agency said it will measure need in a variety of ways including annual input from the Employee Plans (EP) community.

In Rev. Proc. 2017-4 the IRS says procedures for requesting determination letters were modified to reflect that employers may request determination letters on whether covered employees are leased employees only to the extent the employer is otherwise eligible to apply for a determination letter under Rev. Proc. 2016–37.

Procedures for requesting determination letters were modified to reflect that employers that maintain individually designed plans may no longer request determination letters on whether a plan sponsor is part of an affiliated service group.

Procedures for requesting a minimum funding waiver, as described in section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15, 2004–1 C.B. 490, have been modified to eliminate the alternative of requesting a determination letter in conjunction with a minimum funding waiver request. Requests for minimum funding waivers may still be submitted to the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) as requests for private letter rulings. See section 5.15(2) of Rev. Proc. 2017–1.

NEXT: More changes

Procedures for requesting determination letters were modified to reflect that determination letters on partial terminations issued to individually designed plans will be limited in scope to whether a partial termination has occurred, unless the employer is otherwise eligible to apply for a determination letter under Rev. Proc. 2016–37.

The IRS says a favorable determination letter does not constitute a determination with respect to the federal tax consequences of a lump sum risk-transferring program as described in Notice 2015–49, 2015–30 I.R.B. 79. 

Procedures for describing the types of advice provided by Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements were revised to reflect that revenue rulings, information letters, and waivers of the minimum funding standard are no longer issued by Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements, but instead are issued by the Office of Associate Chief Counsel.

Procedures for requesting § 7805(b) relief were modified to reflect delegation of authority to Division Counsel (TEGEDC) to limit retroactive revocation or modification of a determination letter or letter ruling issued by Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements.

Procedures for user fees were modified to reflect the elimination of the five-year remedial amendment period, as well as changes in the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) as described in Rev. Proc. 2016–51

Text of the Revenue Procedure may be found in the Internal Revenue Bulletin 2017-1.

In the Age of HDHPs, Employees Need Education

Employees are assuming more responsibility for health care savings and spending decisions, yet they are unprepared and, in some cases, unwilling to take accountability, says a survey from Alegeus.

Despite year-over-year increases between 2014 and 2016 in the number of U.S. workers enrolled in a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) with a savings component, 63% of employees don’t know the benefits of a health savings account (HSA), and nearly one in three feel no better today about managing their health care finances than when they first became responsible to seek out their own health care, a survey from consumer-directed health care solutions provider Alegeus finds.

More than 50% of employees fear being hit with a big and unexpected health care expense they cannot afford. Sixty-eight percent of employees enrolled in a health care savings account (HSA/flexible spending account [FSA]/health reimbursement account [HRA]) consider themselves to be savers; yet, only 23% save beyond the current year and the majority underfund their health care savings each year.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

Thirty-nine percent of employees enrolled in health care savings accounts rated their understanding of the offerings as competent, yet only three in 10 HSA account holders can pass a basic proficiency test. Twenty-six percent are unaware they can use HSA funds beyond the immediate plan year, and 41% are unaware they can invest HSA funds.

Seven out of 10 employees say they want to take a more active role in their health care overall, but only half intend to do more diligence this year when making their health care purchase decisions. Forty-three percent of employees have never visited their health account portal, called the toll-free number, subscribed to receive communications or downloaded the mobile app. Furthermore, only 36% of savings account participants have visited their provider’s online site, and just one in 10 participants have downloaded the mobile app.

Fifty percent of employees think health care providers can improve their experience through human interaction that answers their questions, makes recommendations or validates their thinking, but they expressed significant distrust of the health system, doctors, employers, benefit providers and employer human resource (HR) representatives when determining how much to save for health care costs and which plan to select during open enrollment.

Alegeus says the survey signals the need for significant education, tools and support that engages and empowers consumers to take ownership and make savvier health care decisions.

Download the full research report.

«