Break from the Grind January 31, 2017

Is the NFL Pension Plan Ready for Retirees?

Reported by

At the start of April 2015, the National Football League Players’ Pension Plan was 74% funded—up from 55% at April 2014, according to an analysis by the Society of Actuaries (SOA).

However, the SOA notes this is largely because benefit changes reduced liabilities by $0.5 billion, leaving $1.8 billion in assets against liabilities of $2.5 billion. In the context of the red-yellow-green zone system commonly used with this type of pension plan, the plan is in the yellow zone.

For more stories like this, sign up for the PLANSPONSOR NEWSDash daily newsletter.

During 2015, NFL clubs collectively contributed $266 million, compared to $306 million for 2014. Of the $266 million contributed for 2015, $36 million covered the cost of benefits that active players earned during 2015, leaving $230 million to be applied toward the funding shortfall of $700 million.

According to the SOA, the average approximate annual pension benefit is $34,000, and $146 million in benefits was paid out in 2015. There are 2,169 active players, 6,017 inactive players and 4,403 retirees receiving benefits.

NFL players have been covered by this pension plan since 1962. The plan considers age 55 to be the standard retirement age. If a player waits until later to start his benefit, his benefit is actuarially increased accordingly. Players are fully vested after 3 credited seasons or 5 years of service in other capacities (for example, as a coach), but the amount of retirement benefits is based on the number of credited seasons.
Data and Research January 31, 2017

Retirees Have Limited Control Over Health Care Inflation

In 2013, Medicare covered 62% of the cost of health care services for Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older, while out-of-pocket spending accounted for 13%, and private insurance covered 13%.
Reported by

A new analysis out from the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) suggests projected savings targets needed to cover health care in retirement went up last year, after several years of decline.

Health care cost projections for retirees indicate major challenges ahead, EBRI explains, but they are actually generally lower than they were five years ago.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

“While there are various factors at play, the main reason for the increase in needed savings is related to the yearly adjustment for out-of-pocket spending for prescription drug use,” observes Paul Fronstin, director of EBRI’s Health Research and Education Program and co-author of the annual health savings analysis. “Because actual out-of-pocket spending for prescription drugs in the most recent data turned out to be higher, future estimates have gone up.”

EBRI warns that its analysis does not factor in the savings needed to cover such things as long-term care expenses, retirement earlier than becoming eligible for Medicare, and higher Medicare premiums related to higher income. Thus, “many individuals will need more than the amounts cited in this report,” Fronstin suggests.

“Some workers will actually need to save less than what is reported if they choose to work past age 65, thereby postponing enrollment in Medicare if they receive health benefits as active workers,” he adds. “The range of increases depends on how much health expenses a person is likely to have and how high a probability they want to have enough money on hand … Specifically, EBRI found, in 2016, a 65-year-old man would need $72,000 in savings and a 65 year-old woman would need $93,000 if each had a goal of having a 50% chance of having enough savings to cover health care expenses in retirement.”

NEXT: More from the EBRI analysis 

EBRI finds that to have a 90% chance of having enough savings, the man would need $127,000 and the woman would need $143,000.

“Not surprisingly, those with high prescription drug costs would need to save substantially more,” Fronstin says. “For a married couple both with drug expenses at the 90th percentile throughout retirement who want a 90% chance of having enough money saved for health care expenses in retirement by age 65, targeted savings would be $349,000 in 2016.”

As Fronstin explains, the EBRI analysis updates previous estimates on savings needed to cover health insurance premiums and health care expenses in retirement: “As before, it points out that projections of savings needed to cover out-of-pocket expenses for prescription drugs are highly dependent on the assumptions used for drug utilization, which is why the analysis provides [a range of estimates].”

Fronstin further observes that “Medicare was never designed to cover health care expenses in full … In 2013, Medicare covered 62% of the cost of health care services for Medicare beneficiaries ages 65 and older, while out-of-pocket spending accounted for 13%, and private insurance covered 13%.”

The full report, “Savings Medicare Beneficiaries Need for Health Expenses: Some Couples Could Need as Much as $350,000,” is published in the Feb. 1, 2017 EBRI Notes, online at www.ebri.org. 

«