J.P. Morgan Warns Long-Term Investment Outlook Is Muted

“Saving more is the most obvious and effective way to improve retirement outcomes," J.P. Morgan experts say.

J.P. Morgan Asset Management has published its updated global market growth assumptions for 2018, offering up a forecast that is broadly unchanged from 2017 estimates.

The 2018 outlook analysis was penned by Anne Lester, head of U.S. retirement solutions for global asset management solutions, and Dan Oldroyd, portfolio manager and head of target-date strategies. The pair pins forward-looking annual developed market growth at 1.5% and emerging markets at 4.5%, translating to “constrained, generally modest return expectations across most major asset classes, further impacted by the late stage of the current business cycle.”

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

As Lester and Oldroyd have warned heading into prior years, many market participants are likely pleased with year-to-date results from their retirement accounts, but the outlook for market returns over the next 10 to 15 years “remains less than inspiring.”

“In an overall portfolio context, the expected return for a simple 60% world equity and 40% U.S. aggregate bond portfolio—in our view, a reasonable proxy for the average asset allocation over a typical participant’s life span—has declined to 5.25%, down from 5.50% last year,” Lester and Oldroyd note. “The stock-bond frontier has shifted in a clock-wise direction—as bonds improve, given an anticipated slow road to normalization, and elevated valuations, typical of the later stage of the business cycle, constrain equity returns.”

Both experts leave some room for ongoing short-term optimism, however: “Our analysis of the interplay between near-term cyclical factors and more enduring secular trends offers reason for cautious optimism. We see potential for technology-induced productivity improvements to help end a prolonged series of downgrades to trend growth. Nevertheless, investors can still expect to face a historically low return environment over the next decade.”

Offering some broad suggestions for retirement plan professionals, the J.P. Morgan analysis suggests individuals need to be given the ability to save more and start earlier.

“Our latest long-term economic growth and market return assumptions, combined with longer life expectancy, validate participants’ concerns about the possibility of outliving their retirement savings,” Lester and Oldroyd say. “Saving more is the most obvious and effective way to improve retirement outcomes.”

Making portfolio diversification easier—which in most cases means making it automatic—is the second suggestion from J.P. Morgan: “The goal, of course, is not simply to offer a broader range of investment options within the core menu; that would leave the complex task of asset allocation to plan participants. In fact, our research suggests that only about one-third of participants are confident in their ability to choose the right investment options from their plan lineups.…In our view, the best way to ensure participants realize the true advantages of diversification all along the road to retirement is through professionally managed portfolio strategies, such as target date funds (TDFs). Of course, that assumes the TDF itself is well-diversified, constructed by skilled asset allocation professionals who understand how participant behavior and investment needs vary over the life cycle and rely on a consistently derived set of long-term asset class return, risk and correlation estimates to inform portfolio construction and management.”

Finally, the analysis suggests retirement investors may want to consider using active management where appropriate.

“With a lower outlook for beta returns across most asset classes, alpha becomes an even more critical component for achieving required returns. Skilled professional investors can generate alpha through adept security selection and/or tactical asset allocation—opportunistically shifting assets across sectors, asset classes and regions as attractive opportunities present themselves,” Lester and Oldroyd conclude. “For example, insights into tangible investment opportunities associated with technological change and the ability to tactically position portfolios through the late-cycle challenges ahead present opportunities for alpha generation. And given the low correlation between the alpha and beta components of return, the active component can also help to diversify portfolio risk.”

Mercer Offers Focus Tips for E&F Investment Committees

Among tips Mercer suggests is evaluating litigation vulnerability at a time when lawsuits against higher education 403(b) plan sponsors are higher than ever.

As the new year settles in, Mercer has released 10 key tips for endowment and foundation (E&F) investment committees, from how to revisit economic, social and governance (ESG) investing to reframing the tone behind active and passive investing.

 

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“E&F portfolios continue to benefit from strong equity markets, with overseas investments contributing at a greater rate than in most periods since the 2008 financial crisis. Record high equity markets, however, may lull investors into a false sense of comfort. Market dynamics make the persistence of this bull run more fragile,” says Ken Shimberg, U.S. Endowment & Foundations chief investment officer, Mercer. “Concurrently, greater reliance on endowments makes institutions more vulnerable to adverse events. Staff and committees should apply a strategic perspective to governance processes and implementation considerations to ensure they provide the checks and balances necessary to support successful investment execution.”

 

Other areas of focus suggested for E&F investment committees, included in the Top Ideas for Endowment and Foundation Investment Committees whitepaper, are implementing a “do nothing” strategy, where committees embrace smaller benefits and maintain assets at current weights for future opportunities; evaluating litigation vulnerability at a time when lawsuits against higher education 403(b) plan sponsors are higher than ever—having skyrocketed in the past two years—; and increasing awareness of tax changes, including the latest modifications in tax reform.

 

Mercer also suggests that to take full advantage of market dislocations, E&F investment committees should review ways that portfolio structure and policy can promote agility in investing to accommodate attractive investment opportunities as they arise. In addition, investment committee and staff processes for reacting to an extraordinary event could be rusty, as the credit crisis was nearly a decade ago, Mercer says. Processes should be reviewed to ensure that they are best suited to current committee dynamics and preferred means of communication. Specific and rules-based protocols should help inform timely decision-making during an adverse event and lessen the behavioral impact that inevitably influence decisions in stressed conditions. Guidelines should reflect the most accurate snapshot of the institution’s risk tolerance.


Mercer says that according to NACUBO data, in the year ending June 2016, endowments with $500 million or less reduced both equities and fixed income in favor of less-liquid strategies. The firm says committees should identify likely demand for capital in the event of a market correction. Institutions may want to establish lines of credit or similar on-demand borrowing, relying on existing banking relationships to negotiate preferential fees and ensure that contracts will be stable through an adverse event.

The full list of Mercer’s tips can be downloaded from here.

«