June Transfers Favor Equity Investments – But Not Company Stock

July 8, 2003 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - As US equity markets closed out a strong second quarter, participants continued a slow, but steady shift to equity investments, according to the Hewitt 401(k) Index.

In June, participants tracked by the Hewitt Index favored equity investments on a net basis on all but four trading days during the month, a trend already evidenced in May (see    Participant Transfers Still Muted in May ) and April (see  April Transfers Slow, But Equity-Oriented ), but in sharp contrast to the prior quarter, where participants favored fixed income investments (see  Transfers Head For Cover Amidst War News ).  

Quiet Pace

Trading volumes during the month continued their quiet pace, however, averaging just 0.07% of balances per day in the second quarter, compared with the trailing 12-month average daily net transfer activity of approximately 0.08%.    For the quarter, there has been only one above-average transfer activity day (June 3, when trading volumes were about 1.65 times normal), compared to more than a dozen in the same quarter a year ago.  

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Even in the first quarter, there were just five above-average trading volume days registered by the 1.5 million participants tracked by the index.   A “normal” level of relative transfer activity is when the net daily movement of participants’ balances as a percent of total 401(k) balances within the Hewitt 401(k) Index equals between 0.3 times and 1.5 times the average daily net activity of the preceding 12 months.

Most of the transferred balances came from GIC/Stable Value options, some 49.62% of the total, while nearly 25% came from bond options.   It was all coming from fixed income options, however - nearly 22% was pulled from company stock investments.   Large cap US equity funds were the primary beneficiaries, pulling in nearly 44% of the month's net transfers, while small cap US equities drew 24%.

In all, for the second quarter, close to a billion dollars, some 1.4% of balances, was transferred from fixed income funds such as GIC/stable value, bond, and money market into stock funds.

When the dust settled, GIC/Stable Value offerings still represented the largest holding in the $70 billion tracked by Hewitt, some 27%.   Company stock was the second largest holding, 25.7%, while large US equity was close behind with 21%.   Balanced funds represented 7.6%, bond funds were nearly 5%, and lifestyle/premixed offerings comprised nearly 4.2% of the total index.   The stock allocation of the Index stood at nearly 61% of total balances as of the end of June. Still, overall stock investment exposure remains well below its 2000 high of 74% of balances.

Stock Slip

Company stock, which had dominated new contribution investment in May, was just 15% of those monies in June.   GIC/Stable Value funds were the most popular target for new contributions last month, pulling nearly 27.5% of the total, followed by the more than 23% directed to large US equity fund options.   Lifestyle/premixed funds drew 7.5%, bond funds got 8.1% and balanced funds drew 4.33%.   Year to date, the average daily allocation to stock investments as a percent of total contributions stands at 63%, compared to a high of 77% in 2000, according to Hewitt.

For the month, the Dow gained 1.53%, the Russell 2000 was 1.64% higher, the NASDAQ ahead 1.69%, and the S&P 500 up 1.13%.   For the quarter, the Dow was 12.43% higher, while the S&P 500 rose 14.89%, the NASDAQ gained 21%, and the Russell 2000 up 22.96%.

Sexual Harassment Claim Thrown Out

June 19, 2002 (PLANSPONSOR.com) - A former employee of a suburban Philadelphia company who received a fake note about erectile dysfunction may have been abused by coworkers, but the maltreatment wasn't bad enough for a sexual harassment lawsuit, a federal judge ruled.

According to a Legal Intelligencer report, sexually explicit materials given to plaintiff Thomas Keown by co-workers, were not enough to make out a hostile work environment claim because they “did not place Mr Keown into a sexually threatening or humiliating position,” US District Judge Berle Schiller wrote.

Keown’s lawyer, Harold Goodman, argued that a pamphlet and Post-It note about erectile dysfunction were particularly offensive to Keown because he had a penile implant.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

Schiller disagreed, saying, “There is no reason it should have interfered with his work performance or had a significant impact on his psychological well-being.”

Schiller also found that the pamphlets “were sent too infrequently – eight or nine pamphlets over a four-month period – to constitute harassment.”

At the same time, Schiller, of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, ruled that the 50-something Keown could move forward with claims he was discriminated against because of his age, as well as charges that he was fired after complaining about the co-worker abuse.

Background

According to court papers, Keown worked in the Norristown, Pennsylvania office of Richfood Holdings, where he was in charge of transportation and oversaw management information systems.

Beginning in October 1998, Keown said he found pamphlets containing sexual content in his work mailbox. One pamphlet was titled “Testosterone Levels: the Key to Great Sex for Men Over Fifty,” and discussed the possible benefits of the hormone androstenedione for sexual potency.

Keown said he confronted Penny Mitchell, Richfood’s accounting vice president, who admitted sending the pamphlet.

Mitchell allegedly told Keown: “You’re an older man. You’ve got gray hair. I thought they would be of interest to you.”

Between October 1998 and January 1999, Keown claimed he received up to 10 more sexually suggestive pamphlets.

All of the pamphlets were small booklets of about eight to 10 pages, he said, and some were more sexually explicit than others.

Age Discrimination

But the harassment was also age-based, Keown claimed, citing a December 1998 telephone conversation in which his direct supervisor, Charlotte Edwards, remarked: “Tom Keown, you’re getting senile on me” and slammed down the telephone.

In the final alleged incident of sexual harassment, Keown claimed he received a pamphlet that discussed erectile dysfunction in older men. Attached to the cover of the pamphlet was a Post-It note signed in the name of Keown’s wife.

Mitchell has admitted sending both the pamphlet and the note.

Meeting

Keown claimed he was called to a meeting with the company’s chief operating officer and the head of human resources, that he believed was to discuss his complaints against Mitchell.

Instead, Keown claimed that his complaint was only touched on at the meeting, and he was denounced for his use of profanity at work and his performance and work ethics were criticized, despite consistently received high performance reviews and pay increases.

Keown also claims his boss recommended that he resign and that he did so several weeks later.

The case is Keown v. Richfood Holdings.

«