To Keep Pension Plan Liabilities Accurate, Get to Know Participants’ Marital Status

Mindy Zatto and Mary Shah, with Strategic Benefits Advisors, discuss how keeping up with pension plan participants’ marital status can reduce instances of ‘lost’ participants and misstated liabilities.

In recent months, sternly worded communications from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) have put pressure on plan administrators to improve their processes for locating lost pension plan participants. But what about finding surviving spouses?

The vast majority of pension plans are designed to pay benefits to a spouse upon the participant’s death, even if that death occurs pre-retirement. Confirming marital status when a participant dies is an important part of a plan administrator’s responsibilities under the 1984 Retirement Equity Act—and one that’s not always easy to fulfill.

Never miss a story — sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters to keep up on the latest retirement plan benefits news.

When a plan participant who is no longer an active employee dies, a family member or estate executor may inform the plan administrator directly, making it easy to determine if there is a surviving spouse. But, more commonly, administrators become aware of a participant’s passing during a routine audit of the plan population by a third-party search provider.

When a plan administrator has good reason to believe that a participant is deceased, the next step is to send an “evidence of existence” letter to the participant’s last known address. If the participant is, in fact, still living, the letter implores him to contact the plan administrator to straighten out the situation. If he is deceased, the letter invites surviving kin to contact the plan administrator to find out if a benefit is due.

Where Things Fall Apart

But what happens when the “evidence of existence” letter goes unanswered — as happens more often than not, in our experience? When plan administrators cannot verify a deceased participant’s marital status, things generally unfold one of two ways: (a) the administrator decides there must not be a spouse and writes off the participant and associated plan liability, claiming no benefit is due; or (b) the administrator recognizes that marital status cannot be determined and keeps the liability on the books indefinitely.

Both approaches are problematic. The first may result in plan sponsors understating their liabilities, whereas the second may result in overstating plan liabilities. And plan sponsors should bear in mind that there is no regulatory framework for “writing off” benefits just because a deceased participant’s marital status cannot be determined. The DOL already requires that plan administrators extend their efforts to locate lost participants beyond a basic third-party address search; similarly, determination of marital status for deceased participants could eventually become an area of focus for DOL plan auditors.

Applying Elbow Grease

Determining marital status—particularly in the event of a participant’s pre-retirement death—takes legwork and personalized attention. Here are some tactics we have used with great success:

  • Check funeral homes and local obituaries for death announcements that may not appear in state data and use them to identify the deceased’s next of kin;
  • Mine employee data, such as old health and welfare or life insurance plan records, for the name of the participant’s spouse or a family member who could verify the participant’s marital status; and
  • When available, source death certificates that identify the deceased’s marital status from state agencies.

We apply advanced search tactics that take into account a nuanced understanding of the search protocols of various systems of record. For instance, sometimes a search for the obituary of “John L. Doe” is too limiting, causing death records for “John Doe,” no middle initial, to be overlooked. We also expand the area of our searches beyond the participant’s last known city or state of residence.

Foresight Pays Dividends

Plan sponsors not only have a fiduciary obligation to identify spouses who may be owed a benefit, they also have a responsibility to company stakeholders to ensure plan liabilities are reported as accurately as possible. Whether or not the DOL makes marital status determination a focus of pension plan audits—as we suspect will eventually happen—plan sponsors can save money in the long term by identifying marital status early on and keeping track of surviving spouses until benefits are due.

Mary Shah, FSA [ Fellow, Society of Actuaries], EA [Enrolled Actuary], and Mindy Zatto, FSA, EA, MAAA [Member, American Academy of Actuaries] and FCA [Fellow, Conference of Consulting Actuaries], are principals of Strategic Benefits Advisors, an independent, full-service employee benefits consulting firm focused on solving complex benefits issues for clients ranging from 500 to over 300,000 employees. Shah and Zatto have almost 60 years’ combined experience in benefit plan administration and consulting. They can be reached at info@sba-inc.com.

This feature is to provide general information only, does not constitute legal or tax advice, and cannot be used or substituted for legal or tax advice. Any opinions of the author do not necessarily reflect the stance of Institutional Shareholder Services or its affiliates.

Edward Jones and Age Wave Introduce the New Four Pillars of Retirement

The ideas explain what retirees are focusing on after the workforce and as they enter the next chapter.

A new study by Edward Jones and Age Wave, “The Four Pillars of the New Retirement,” focuses on overall well-being among retirees and those nearing retirement. According to study findings, 55% of retirees surveyed said they viewed retirement as “a new chapter in life,” while 22% said they believe it is a “time for rest and relaxation.”

Ken Dychtwald, a psychologist/gerontologist and founder and CEO of Age Wave, attributed these positive viewpoints to the growing life expectancy seen around the globe. “Life expectancy is rising, and people are taking notice of that,” he said during a roundtable held by the two groups on July 29, that discussed the new era of retirement post-COVID-19, one that’s focused on the four pillars of health, family, purpose and finances.   

One of the more surprising results of the study was the pandemic’s impact on retirees. According to the findings, 61% of workers say COVID-19 has not impacted their retirement timing. Older age groups are also facing much less financial and emotional disruption than younger workers—39% of those in the Silent Generation say they are coping very well with COVID-19’s impacts, and 33% of Baby Boomers say the same, compared with 26% for Millennials and 21% for Generation Zers. But older adults have experienced multiple life challenges throughout their livelihoods and are now afforded Social Security and Medicare, the report says, which likely contributes to these retirees not feeling as stressed as younger workers, who are likely battling several challenges.

Get more!  Sign up for PLANSPONSOR newsletters.

“If you’re over 65 in this country, you’ve got some safety nets,” Dychtwald said. “The combination of this and being more resilient gives support to the older people.”

Health span—the length of time an individual feels well before a health decline—and health care costs were also examined in the study. Dychtwald noted that American workers experienced, on average, 10 years of decline in illness and health, all while paying high health care costs. “Not only is this very expensive for the country, but it could break the bank for families,” he said.

In fact, in survey findings, Age Wave found the greatest financial worries for retirees and pre-retirees are health care and long-term care costs. Fifty-two percent of retirees have these concerns, while 66% of pre-retirees do. The survey also found that two-thirds of workers who plan on retiring in the next 10 years say they have no idea what their health and long-term costs will be in retirement.

These individuals aren’t looking to their families for financial support either, as 72% say their biggest fear is becoming a burden on their families. However, one in four Americans over the age of 64 have not discussed their end-of-life care preferences with anyone at all.

While the survey found overwhelmingly optimistic opinions on retirement, 31% of new retirees are struggling to find a sense of purpose. Additionally, 89% believe there should be more ways for retirees to use their talents and knowledge for the benefit of communities and society at large.

“People really spend their time in retirement starting to think about purpose,” added Ken Cella, Edward Jones Client Strategies Group principal. “Not just purpose in the sense of understanding it, but, ‘How do I take a few steps to start to do those things that I’m most passionate about that will allow me to leave my legacy?’ It’s a whole personal approach that goes past finances.”

«