Lockton Adds Health Benefits Experts to Chicago Staff
August 4, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – Lockton, a provider of risk management, insurance and employee benefits consulting services, will add two employee benefits experts to its Chicago office.
Joining Lockton in vice president, producer roles will be David
Cooke and Mark Haye. Both will be responsible for business development and
client strategy at Lockton.
“We are so pleased to add the impressive credentials of
David Cooke and Mark Haye to our practice. Lockton’s prospects and clients will
benefit greatly from their expertise in group medical benefits strategy,
design, funding and administration. Mark and David have both developed effective
benefits strategies for employers of every shape and size during their
careers,” says Tom Schaffler, president of Lockton’s Chicago office.
Cooke brings more than 25 years of experience in health and
welfare benefits, with a financial analysis and underwriting background. Most
recently, he was a producer and senior consultant in Aon Hewitt’s health and benefits
practice in Chicago. He specializes in helping employers formulate long-term
benefits strategies to mitigate their rising benefits expenses.
Before joining Aon Hewitt, Cooke worked as a health and
welfare consultant for another national employee benefits firm, consulting on
both U.S. and global health and benefits programs for employers. He holds his
CEBS designation from the International Foundation of Employee Benefits, is
a frequent presenter at national benefit conferences and webcasts and serves on
the Corporate Board of the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans.
He is a graduate of Colgate University.
Haye brings more than 20 years of experience in the employee
benefits financial management space. Most recently, he worked at Mercer Health
& Benefits, gaining expertise in organizational design and
effectiveness, strategic planning and new business development.
Prior to his time at Mercer, Haye worked for Aon for three
years and Hewitt for five years. He holds a CEBS designation from the
International Foundation of Employee Benefits and frequently hosts seminars and
roundtable discussions on topics relevant to senior human resource and finance
leaders. He is a graduate of New York University’s Stern School of Business.
More Plan Sponsors Considering Re-Enrollment into TDFs
August 4, 2014 (PLANSPONSOR.com) – In an effort to combat participant inertia, more plan sponsors are considering the process of re-enrollment, says a recent brief from J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
The brief, “Understanding Re-Enrollment: Benefits for
Participants and Plan Sponsors,” defines the term re-enrollment as a process by
which retirement plan participants are notified that their existing assets and future
contributions will be invested in the plan’s qualified default investment
alternative (QDIA), which is usually a target-date fund (TDF), based on the
participant’s date of birth. Participants are automatically moved into the QDIA
on a certain date unless they make a new investment election during a specified
time period.
“There are three types of QDIAs that plan sponsors can
choose from—a managed accounted service, a balanced (risk-based) portfolio, or
a suite of target-date funds,” Catherine Peterson, head of Retirement Insights
at J. P Morgan Asset Management, tells PLANSPONSOR. She explains that based on
industry data, the majority of plan sponsors select the suite of TDFs as their
QDIA. In this case, each defaulted participant is mapped to the most
appropriate target-date fund based on their age. For example, if a participant
was born between 1959 and 1963, they would be mapped to a 2025 fund, assuming a
retirement age of 65.
Plan sponsors that use re-enrollment usually see an
increased adoption of TDFs, according to the J.P. Morgan paper. With
re-enrollment, the adoption rate can be between 55% and 85%, while plan sponsors that just add TDFs as a new option in their investment lineups see adoption rates of 5% or less, even after the passage of several
years.
The Benefits of Re-Enrollment
Peterson says re-enrollment has benefits for both plan
participants and plan sponsors. “There are a number of reasons why plan sponsors would want
to do a re-enrollment, chief among them is the opportunity to help improve the
outcomes of their plan participants,” she explains. “For participants that are
re-enrolled into a target-date fund, benefits include professional management
of their assets, which incorporates age-appropriate asset allocation decisions
and provides diversification. Another valuable benefit is the potential for
improving participant confidence and engagement in how they are saving for
retirement.”
Carrying out a re-enrollment not only helps get participants
into a diversified portfolio, according to the brief, but also helps to ensure
their asset allocation changes with them over time.
Plan sponsors that conduct a re-enrollment may benefit in a
number of ways, the New York-based Peterson says, including the improved
confidence that their participant base is appropriately invested within the
plan and an increase in overall participant satisfaction with the plan.
Another key re-enrollment benefit for plan sponsors is the
fiduciary protection that plan sponsors receive from conducting a re-enrollment
that redeploys participant assets into the chosen QDIA. The fact that many plan
sponsors are unaware of this benefit may help explain why re-enrollment is an
underutilized strategy, she says.
Executing a Re-Enrollment
According to Peterson, the first step in doing a
re-enrollment is clear communication. “Plan sponsors might begin by sending
employees an e-mail or flyer that announces the re-enrollment and provides
information on what to expect and important dates.”
This initial communication should take place 60 days prior to
the default date, she says. That would be followed by more detailed information
describing the investment options and process for opting out, which would be
sent out 30 days prior. Other required notices would also be sent out at this
time.
Sending out a reminder at least one week prior to the
default date is recommended to reinforce
key messages about saving and investment, Peterson says, as well as to ensure
that participants are aware of important deadlines.
“Plan sponsors should work closely with their
service provider on all aspects of the process, which will enable them to
capitalize on best practices,” Peterson says. While the timeline for
re-enrollment varies by plan and recordkeeper, it is typically a 60- to 90-day
process.
Reactions from Participants
According to Peterson, many plan sponsors have received
positive feedback about the re-enrollment process from their participants,
since it simplifies investing decisions for these employees.
She recommends that to prevent participant misunderstanding
or dissatisfaction, “It is critical for plan sponsors to invest the time to
think about, and put in place, an effective participant communications plan and
to work with their service provider.”
The communication process should explain what is happening,
what actions participants need to take and what will happen if they do not take
action, says Peterson.
“Communication materials should also address different types
of investors,” she says. “For those who lack the time or desire to make
investment decisions, a target-date fund may be appropriate for them. Those
participants will not have to take any action, and can allow their assets and
future contributions to default into the age-appropriate target-date fund.”
For those participants who prefer to actively manage their
investments, they can either choose to opt out of the re-enrollment process or
make a new investment election, Peterson says.
A copy of the J.P. Morgan brief on re-enrollment can be found
here.